In operating the air-cleaner for a long time, people in a quiet enclosed space expect low sound at low operational levels for a routine cleaning of air. However, in the condition of high operational levels of the cleaner, a powerful yet nonannoying sound is desired, which is connected to a feeling of an immediate cleaning of pollutants. In this context, it is important to evaluate and design the air-cleaner noise to satisfy such contradictory expectations from the customers. In this study, a model for evaluating the sound quality of air-cleaners of mechanical type was developed based on objective and subjective analyses. Sound signals from various air-cleaners were recorded and they were edited by increasing or decreasing the loudness at three wide specific-loudness bands: 20–400 Hz (0–3.8 barks), 400–1250 Hz (3.8–10 barks), and 1.25–12.5 kHz bands (10–22.8 barks). Subjective tests using the edited sounds were conducted by the semantic differential method (SDM) and the method of successive intervals (MSI). SDM tests for seven adjective pairs were conducted to find the relation between subjective feeling and frequency bands. Two major feelings, performance and annoyance, were factored out from the principal component analysis. We found that the performance feeling was related to both low and high frequency bands, whereas the annoyance feeling was related to high frequency bands. MSI tests using the seven scales were conducted to derive the sound quality index to express the severity of each perceptive descriptor. Annoyance and performance indices of air-cleaners were modeled from the subjective responses of the juries and the measured sound quality metrics: loudness, sharpness, roughness, and fluctuation strength. The multiple regression method was employed to generate sound quality evaluation models. Using the developed indices, sound quality of the measured data was evaluated and compared with the subjective data. The difference between predicted and tested scores was less than 0.5 points.

1.
Engen
,
T.
, 1971,
Psychophysics: Scaling Methods
, 3rd ed.,
Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
,
New York
.
2.
Ih
,
J. -G.
,
Lim
,
D. -H.
,
Shin
,
S. -H.
, and
Park
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Experimental Design and Assessment of Product Sound Quality: Application to a Vacuum Cleaner
,”
Noise Control Eng. J.
,
51
, pp.
244
252
. 0736-2501
3.
Bodden
,
M.
,
Heinrichs
,
R.
, and
Linow
,
A.
, 1998, “
Sound Quality Evaluation of Interior Vehicle Noise Using an Efficient Psychoacoustic Method
,”
Proceedings of the Euro Noise 98
,
H.
Fastl
and
J.
Scheuren
, eds.,
DEGA
,
Oldenberg
, pp.
609
614
.
4.
David
,
H. A.
, 1988,
The Method of Paired Comparisons
, 2nd ed.,
Oxford University
,
New York
.
5.
2002, KS C 9314: Air Cleaner, Korean Standards Associations.
6.
Beranek
,
L.
, and
Ver
,
I.
, 1992,
Noise and Vibration Control Engineering: Principles and Applications
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
7.
2003, ISO 3745: Acoustics-Determination of Sound Power Levels of Noise Sources Using Sound Pressure Precision Methods for Anechoic and Hemi-anechoic Rooms, International Organization for Standardization.
8.
Zwicker
,
E.
, and
Fastl
,
H.
, 1990,
Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
, pp.
181
236
.
9.
Shin
,
S. -H.
, and
Ih
,
J. -G.
, 2004, “
A Comparison of Commercial Software for the Sound Quality Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the Autumn Meeting of the Acoustical Society of Korea
,
Acoustical Society of Korea
,
Seoul
, pp.
215
218
.
10.
Devore
,
J. L.
, 1995,
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Science
, 4th ed.,
Duxbury
,
Singapore
.
11.
Shin
,
S. -H.
,
Ih
,
J. -G.
, and
Jeong
,
H.
, 2003, “
Statistical Processing of Subjective Listening Test Data for PSQ
,”
Noise Control Eng. J.
,
51
, pp.
232
238
. 0736-2501
You do not currently have access to this content.