Dither control is a method of introducing high-frequency control efforts into a system to suppress a lower-frequency disturbance. One application of dither control is the suppression of automotive brake squeal. Brake squeal is a problem that has plagued the automotive industry for years. Placing a piezoceramic stack actuator in the piston of a floating caliper brake creates an experimental normal dither system. Many theoretical models indicate a reduction in the braking torque due to the normal dither signal. Using a Hertzian contact stiffness model, the loss in friction is due to lowering the average normal force. There are also theories that the dither signal eliminates the “stick-slip” oscillation causing an effective decrease in the friction force. Yet another theory indicates that the effective contact area is reduced, lowering the mean coefficient of friction. A particular approach considering a single-degree-of-freedom friction oscillator predicts a maximum friction reduction of 10%, occurring at the primary resonance of the system. This paper will concentrate on validating this claim by experimentally determining braking torque reduction for a variety of dither control signals. Several dither control frequencies were chosen at system resonances, while others were chosen at frequencies most likely to provide control of the system. These frequencies were chosen based on previous squeal suppression research. The results indicate that dither control frequencies at system resonances have a greater impact on the braking system’s performance. In general, dither control reduces braking torque by no more than 2%.

1.
Graf
A.
, 2001, “
Active Control of Automotive Disc Brake Rotor Squeal Using Dither
,” Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
2.
Cunefare
K. A.
, and
Graf
A. J.
, 2002, “
Experimental Active Control of Automotive Disc Brake Rotor Squeal Using Dither
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
250
, pp.
579
590
.
3.
ASME
, 1994, “
Research Needs and Opportunities in the Area of Interaction of Friction and System Dynamics
,” ASME Research Report CRTD-Vol. 42, based on an NSF-sponsored workshop on the Interaction of Friction and System Dynamics held in Pittsburgh, PA, August 8–9.
4.
Ferri
A. A.
, 1995, “
Friction Damping and Isolation Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
117B
, pp.
196
206
.
5.
Hess
D. P.
, and
Soom
A.
, 1991, “
Normal Vibrations and Friction Under Harmonic Loads: Part I—Hertzian Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
113
, pp.
80
86
.
6.
Hess
D. P.
,
Soom
A.
, and
Kim
C. H.
, 1991, “
Normal Vibrations and Friction at a Hertzian Contact Under Random Excitation: Theory and Experiment
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
153
, pp.
491
508
.
7.
Lin
J.-W.
, and
Bryant
M. D.
, 1995, “
Reductions in Wear Rate of Carbon Samples Sliding Against Wavy Copper Surfaces
,” in
Joint ASME/STLE Tribology Conference
, ASME Paper No. 95-TRIB-3.
Orlando
,
FL
.
8.
Oden
J. T.
, and
Martins
J. A. C.
, 1985, “
Models and Computational Methods for Dynamic Friction Phenomena
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
52
, pp.
527
634
.
9.
Tolstoi
D. M.
,
Borisova
G. A.
, and
Grigorova
S. R.
, 1973, “
Friction Reduction by Perpendicular Oscillation
,”
Sov. Phys. Dokl.
0038-5689,
17
, pp.
907
909
.
10.
Badertscher
J. W.
, and
Cunefare
K. A.
, 2005, “
Braking Impact of Normal Dither Signals for Squeal Suppression
,” presented at
International Symposium on Active Control of Sound and Vibration
, Williamsburg, VA.
11.
Kinkaid
N. M.
,
O’Reilly
,
O. M.
, and
Papadopoulos
P.
, 2002, “
Automotive Disc Brake Squeal
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
267
, pp.
105
166
.
12.
Ouyang
H.
,
Mottershead
J. E.
,
Cartmell
M. P.
, and
Friswell
M. I.
, 1998, “
Friction-Induced Parametric Resonances in Discs: Effect of a Negative Friction-Velocity Relationship
,”
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
209
, pp.
251
264
.
13.
Spurr
T. R.
, 1961, “
A Theory of Brake Squeal
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.)
0954-4070,
1
, pp.
33
52
.
14.
Spurr
R. T.
, 1972, “
Brake Squeal
,”
The Institute of Mechanical Engineers-Vibration and Noise in Motor Vehicles
,
C95/71
, pp.
13
16
.
15.
Godfrey
D.
, 1967, “
Vibration Reduces Metal to Metal Contact and Causes an Apparent Reduction in Friction
,”
ASLE Trans.
0569-8197,
10
.
16.
Hess
D. P.
, and
Soom
A.
, 1991, “
Normal Vibrations and Friction Under Harmonic Loads: Part II—Rough Planar Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
113
, pp.
87
92
.
17.
Sakamoto
T.
, 1985, “
Normal Displacement of the Sliding Body in a Stick-Slip Friction Process
,”
Proceedings of JSLE International Tribology Conference
,
Tokyo
,
Japan
.
18.
Sakamoto
T.
, 1987, “
Normal Displacement and Dynamic Friction Characteristics in A Stick-Slip Process
,”
Tribol. Int.
0301-679X,
20
, pp.
25
31
.
19.
Tolstoi
D. M.
, 1967, “
Significance of the Normal Degree of Freedom and Natural Normal Vibrations in Contact Friction
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
10
, pp.
199
213
.
20.
Ibrahim
R. A.
, 1994, “
Friction-Induced Vibration, Chatter, Squeal, and Chaos—Part I: Mechanics of Contact and Friction; Part II: Dynamics and Modeling
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
0003-6900,
47
, pp.
209
253
.
21.
Bindemann
A. C.
, and
Ferri
A. A.
, 1995, “
The Influence of Alternative Friction Models on the Passive Damping and Dynamic Response of a Flexible Structure
,” presented at
36th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
,
New Orleans
,
LA
.
22.
Fieldhouse
J. D.
, and
Rennison
M.
, 1998, “
The Value of Noise Fix Shims, A Case Study
,” presented at
Second International Seminar on Automitive Braking
.
23.
Sherif
H. A.
, 1991, “
On the Design of Anti-Squeal Friction Pads for Disc Brakes
,” SAE Paper No. 910575.
24.
Matsuzaki
M.
, and
Izumihara
T.
, 1993, “
Brake Noise Caused by Longitudinal Vibration of the Disc Rotor
,” SAE Paper No. 930804.
25.
Nishizawa
Y.
,
Saka
H.
, and
Nakajima
S.
, 1998, “
Development of an Electronically Controlled Disc Brake Noise Canceling System
,”
SEI Tekunikaru Rebyu
, pp.
145
151
.
26.
Lee
S.
, and
Meerkov
S. M.
, 1991, “
Generalized Dither
,”
Int. J. Control
0020-7179,
53
, pp.
741
747
.
You do not currently have access to this content.