This paper presents two alternative implementations of skyhook control, named “skyhook function” and “no-jerk skyhook,” for reducing the dynamic jerk that is often experienced with conventional skyhook control in semiactive suspension systems. An analysis of the relationship between the absolute velocity of the sprung mass and the relative velocity across the suspension are used to show the damping-force discontinuities that result from the conventional implementation of skyhook control. This analysis shows that at zero crossings of the relative velocity, conventional skyhook introduces a sharp increase (jump) in damping force, which, in turn, causes a jump in sprung-mass acceleration. This acceleration jump, or jerk, causes a significant reduction in isolation benefits that can be offered by skyhook suspensions. The alternative implementations of skyhook control included in this study offer modifications to the formulation of conventional skyhook control such that the damping force jumps are eliminated. The alternative policies are compared to the conventional skyhook control in the laboratory, using a base-excited semiactive system that includes a heavy-truck seat suspension. An evaluation of the damping force, seat acceleration, and the electrical currents supplied to a magnetorheological damper, which is used for this study, shows that the alternative implementations of skyhook control can entirely eliminate the damping-force discontinuities and the resulting dynamic jerks caused by conventional skyhook control.

Issue Section:
Technical Briefs
Keywords:
vibration control, vibrations, road vehicles, damping, magnetorheology, vehicle dynamics
Topics:
Dampers, Damping, Trucks, Suspension systems, Electric current
1.
Karnopp, D. C., and Cosby, M. J., 1974, “System for Controlling the Transmission of Energy Between Spaced Members,” U.S. Patent 3,807,678.
2.
Crosby, M. J., and Karnopp, D. C., 1973, “The Active Damper,” Shock Vib. Bull., 43.
3.
Carlson, J. D., Catanzarite, D. M., and Clair, K. A. St., 1995, “Commercial Magneto Rheological Fluid Devices,” International Conference On Electro-Rheological, Magneto rheological Suspensions and Associated Technology, Sheffield.
4.
Carlson, J. D., and Chrzan, M. J., 1994, “Magneto Rheological Fluid Dampers,” Patent No. 5,277,281.
5.
Ahmadian
,
M.
, and
Marjoram
,
R. H.
,
1989
, “
Effects of Passive and Semiactive Suspensions on Body and Wheelhop Control
,”
J. Commercial Veh.
,
98
, pp.
596
–
604
.
6.
Ahmadian, M., and Marjoram, R. H., 1989, “On the Development of a Simulation Model for Tractor Semitrailer Systems With Semiactive Suspensions,” Proc. of the Special Joint Symposium on Advanced Technologies, 1989 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, San Francisco, DSC13, ASME, New York.
7.
Chalasani, R. M., 1986, “Ride Performance Potential of Active Suspension Systems—Part II: Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Full-Car Model,” Proceedings of the 1986 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, ASME, New York.
8.
Chalasani, R. M., 1986, “Ride Performance Potential of Active Suspension Systems—Part I: Simplified Analysis Based on a Quarter-Car Model,” Proceedings of the 1986 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, ASME, New York.
9.
Ahmadian
,
M.
,
1999
, “
On the Isolation Properties of Semiactive Dampers
,”
J. Vib. Control
,
5
(
2
), pp.
217
–
232
.
10.
Krasnicki, E. J., 1980, “Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Results for a Semiactive Vibration Isolator,” Shock Vib. Bull., 50.
11.
Miller, L. R., 1988, “An approach to Semiactive Control of Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
12.
Ivers, D. E., and Miller, L. R., 1991, “Semiactive Suspension Technology: An Evolutionary View,” ASME Advanced Automotive Technologies, DE-40, Book No. H00719-1991, ASME, New York, pp. 327–346.
13.
Song, X., 1999, “Design of Adaptive Vibration Control Systems With Application to Magneto-Rheological Dampers,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
14.
Reichert, B. A., 1997, “Application of Magneto Rheological Dampers for Vehicle Seat Suspensions,” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
15.
International Standards Organization, 1994, “Earth-Moving Machinery—Laboratory Evaluation of Operator Seat Vibration,” Standard 7096, ISO.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.