This paper demonstrates a new method of conducting a noncontacting vibration measurement on light structures. Although laser vibrometry provides a routine method of acquiring response data, the method of achieving noncontacting point excitation of structures remains problematic. This is the primary concern of the paper. There is understandable motivation to develop a viable noncontacting excitation method as exciting methods involve contact thereby altering the structure’s in-situ properties. The method demonstrated in the paper explores the use of focused acoustic excitation. An ellipsoid cavity has been constructed which is designed to emit focused plane wave excitation over an area of 1 in. diameter, thus approximating to point excitation. The paper outlines the design and construction of the ellipsoid shell and discusses the design parameters in relation to the frequency response and footprint of the excitation. The results presented compare measurements acquired via this new method and the corresponding Frequency Response Functions obtained by the electrodynamic excitation. Significant differences are observable, largely arising from the mass loading effects associated with the standard modal testing procedures.

1.
Weaver, H. J., and Dodell, J. K., 1984, “Modal Parameter Estimation via Shaker vs. Speaker Excitation,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 887–893.
2.
Musson
,
B. G.
, and
Stevens
,
J. R.
,
1985
, “
Acoustic Excitation for Modal Response Measurement
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
19
(
4
), pp.
24
27
.
3.
Wu, J., and Moslehy, F. A., 1995, “On Modal Testing Using Speaker for Excitation,” Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 24–29.
4.
Moslehy, F. A., and Wu, J., 1997, “Modal Testing Using two Speakers and Application to the Space Shuttle Tiles Bond Assessment,” Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 7–12.
5.
Castellini, P., Esposito, E., Paone, N., and Tomasini, E. P., 1999, “Non-invasive Measurements of Damage of Frescoes Paintings and Icon by Laser Scanning Vibrometer: Experimental Results on Artificial Samples Using Different Types of Structural Exciters,” 6th World Conference on NDT and Microanalysis in Diagnostics and Conservation of Cultural and Environmental Heritage, 4, 12, http://www.ndt.net/article/v04n12/tomasini/tomasini.htm
6.
Castellini, P., Esposito, Miandro, F. E., Paone, N., Santolini, C., and Tomasini, E. P., 1999, “Non-invasive Measurements of Structural Damage by Laser Scanning Vibrometer: An Experimental Comparison Among Different Exciters,” Proceedings of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 692–698.
7.
Patton, M., and Trethawey, M., 1986, “A Technique for Non-contacting Modal Analysis of Ultra-light-weight Structure,” Proceedings of the 5th International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 1425–1431.
8.
Saldner
,
H. O.
,
1994
, “
Calibrated Non-contact Exciters for Optical Modal Analysis
,”
Vibration Measurements, SPIE
,
2358
, pp.
227
237
.
9.
Clark
,
R. L.
,
Fuller
,
C. R.
, and
Wicks
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Characterization of Multiple Piezoelectric Actuators for Structural Excitation
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
90
(
1
), pp.
346
357
.
10.
Gibbs
,
G. P.
, and
Fuller
,
C. R.
,
1992
, “
Excitation of Thin Beams Using Asymmetric Piezoelectric Actuators
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
,
92
(
6
), pp.
3221
3227
.
11.
Castellini, P., Revel, G. M., and Scalise L., 1999, “Laser Pulse Excitation for Modal Analysis,” Proceedings of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, pp. 999–1004.
12.
Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., and Sanders, J. V., 1982, Fundamentals of Acoustics, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, USA.
13.
Broch, J. T., 1971, Acoustic Noise Measurements, 2nd Edition, Bru¨el & Kjær, Denmark.
You do not currently have access to this content.