This paper investigates the effects of adjusting the system matrices of a Finite Element (FE) model on the eigen-properties of the model for the purposes of dynamic model updating. It is shown that minor modifications to the connectivity of the model can cause unexpectedly significant eigenvalue perturbations of the lower modes, especially if the physical location of the modification is near an antinode of vibration of a lower mode. These modifications can be introduced either by non-parametric updating techniques or unwittingly by truncation of the FE structural matrices. It is proposed that model updating techniques specifically avoid introducing such changes to the model either directly or indirectly. A mathematical bound has been established which gives a limit on eigenvalue perturbations. From this bound it has been deduced that a definable degree of computational precision is necessary for FE analysis for the purposes of model updating.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Dynamic models, Eigenvalues, Finite element analysis, Finite element model, Vibration
1.
Lieven
N. A. J.
, and
Ewins
D. J.
, “
Notation for Modal Testing & Analysis
,”
International Journal of Applied and Experimental Modal Analysis
, Vol.
7
, No.
2
, April 1992, pp.
151
–
156
.
2.
Baruch
M.
, “
Optimization Procedure to Correct Stiffness and Flexibility Matrices Using Vibration Tests
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
16
, No.
11
, 1978, pp.
1208
–
1210
.
3.
Berman
A.
, and
Nagy
E. J.
, “
Improvement of a Large Analytical Model Using Test Data
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
21
, 1983, pp.
1168
–
1173
.
4.
Sidhu, J., and Ewins, D. J., Correlation of Finite Element and Modal Test Studies of a Practical Structure, IMAC II, 1984, pp. 756–762.
5.
Dubbaka, K. R., and Houghton, R., Correction of Experimental Mode Shapes, IMAC XIV, 1996, pp. 755–760.
6.
Kabe
A. M.
, “
Stiffness Matrix Adjustment Using Mode Data
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
23
, No.
9
, 1985, pp.
1431
–
1436
.
7.
Friswell, M. I., and Mottershead, J. E., Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, ISBN 0-7923-3431-0.
8.
Visser, W. J., Imregun, M., and Ewins, D. J., “Direct Use of Measured FRF Data to Update Finite Element Models,” Proceedings of 17th International Seminar on Modal Analysis, 1992, pp. 33–49.
9.
Fritzen, C., and Kiefer, T., “Localization and Correction of Errors in Finite Element Models Based on Experimental Data,” Proceedings of 17th International Seminar on Modal Analysis, 1992, pp. 1581–1596.
10.
Soma, A., and Gola, M., “Model Updating Through Receptance Sensitivity,” Proceedings of 17th International Seminar on Modal Analysis, 1992, pp. 17–31.
11.
Gladwell
G. M. L.
, and
Ahmadian
H.
, “
Generic Element Matrices Suitable for Finite Element Model Updating
,”
MSSP
, 1995, Vol.
9
, No.
6
, pp.
601
–
614
.
12.
Wilkinson, J. H., The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem, Oxford University Press, 1965, ISBN 19-853418-3.
13.
Przemieniecki, J. S., Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill, 1968, ISBN 0-07-050904-2.
14.
Sutter
T. R.
,
Carmarda
C. J.
,
Walsh
J. L.
, and
Adelman
H. M.
, “
Comparison of Several Methods for Calculating Vibration Mode Shape Derivatives
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
26
, No.
12
, 1988, pp.
1506
–
1511
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.