Details are presented of an analysis and computer code for the calculation of complex multi-span rotor-bearing-pedestal-foundation systems. This multi-level system analysis is based on the Prohl-Myklestad transfer matrix method. The rotor model used is similar to that given by Lund and Orcutt [1]. Eight-coefficient bearings are also used, to permit elliptical orbit rotor motions. The bearings are mounted in massive, damped flexible pedestals, which are themselves mounted upon a foundation structure with distributed mass and stiffness properties. The foundation in turn, is supported on a number of flexible-damped supports. Different foundation properties in the horizontal and vertical directions are included. The analysis is described in detail, along with the computer code, and the results obtained with it are compared with data published previously by other investigators. It is shown that transfer matrix methods can be successfully used for multi-level systems, and that the additional computational ejfort involved is moderate. Three applications of the code are described which validate various aspects of the analysis and the computer program.

1.
Lund, J. W., and Orcutt, F. K., “Calculations and Experiments on the Unbalance Response of a Flexible Rotor,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, Paper 67-Vibr-27, pp. 785–792. November 1967.
2.
Lund, J. W., “Rotor-Bearing Dynamics Design Technology. Part V: Computer Program Manual for Rotor Response and Stability,” Technical Report TR-65-45 Part V, U.S. Air Force Systems Command. WPAFB, Dayton, OH, May 1965.
3.
Prohl
M. A.
, “
A General Method for Calculating Critical Speeds of Flexible Rotors
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
12
, p.
A-142
A-142
,
1945
.
4.
Koenig
E. C.
, “
Analysis for Calculating Lateral Vibration Characteristics of Rotating Systems with any Number of Flexible Supports
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
28
, p.
585
585
,
1961
.
5.
Gunter, E. J., and Choy, K. C, “Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Rotor-Bearing Systems Using a Model Approach,” University of Virginia Research Laboratories Report UVA/464761-/MAE 78/148, March 1978.
6.
Nicholas, J. C., Gunter, E. J., and Allaire, P. E., “Effect of Residual Shaft Bow on Unbalance Response and Balancing of a Single-Mass Rotor. Part 1: Unbalance Response,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, April 1976.
7.
Ruhl
R. L.
, and
Booker
J. F.
, “
A Finite Element Model for Distributed Parameter Turborotor Systems
,”
Trans. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
94
, No.
1
, pp.
126
132
, February 1972.
8.
Zorzi
E.
, and
Nelson
H.
, “
Finite Element Simulation of Rotor-Bearing Systems with Internal Damping
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
99
, Series A, No.
1
, pp.
71
76
, January
1977
.
9.
Rieger, N. F., “Unbalance Response and Balancing of Flexible Rotors in Bearings,” ASME Monograph, Design Engineering Division, Flexible Rotor Systems Sub-Committee, 1973.
10.
Rieger, N. F., Rotor-Bearing Systems—Structural Mechanics Computer Programs, University of Virginia Press, Chapter 6, pp. 473–498, 1974.
11.
Rieger, N. F., Vibrations of Rotating Machinery, Part I: Rotor-Bearing Systems, The Vibration Institute, Clarendon Hills, IL, 1982.
12.
Rieger, N. F., Balancing of Rigid and Flexible Rotors, Shock and Vibration Monograph, No. 11, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 1985.
13.
Rao, J. S., Rotor Dynamics, Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, 1983.
14.
Bhat
R. B.
,
Subbiah
R.
, and
Sankar
T. S.
, “
Dynamic Behavior of Simple Rotor With Dissimilar Hydrodynamic Bearings by Modal Analysis
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF VIBRATION, ACOUSTICS, STRESS AND RELIABILITY IN DESIGN
, Vol.
107
, No.
2
, pp.
267
2
, April 1989.
15.
Crook, A. W., and Grantham, F., “An Approach to the Prediction of Vibrations of Turbine-Generators on UnderTuned Foundations,” First ASME Vibration Conference, Boston, MA, 1967.
16.
Pizzigoni, B., Diana, G., and Bachschmidt, E., “Influence of Foundation Supports on Response of an Elastic Rotor in Bearings,” 6th ASME Biennial Vibration Conference, Chicago, IL, 1977.
17.
Major, A., Vibration Analysis and Design of Foundations for Machines and Turbines, Academi Kiado, Budapest, 1962.
18.
Rouch, K. E., and Rao, J. S., “Dynamic Reduction of Rotor Dynamics by the Finite Element Method,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 102, 360, 1980.
19.
Boyce, L., Kozik, T. J., and Parzen, E., “Probabilistic Design and Analysis of Foundation Forces for a Class of Unbalanced Rotating Machines,” ASME JOURNAL OF VIBRATION, ACOUSTICS, STRESS AND RELIABILITY IN DESIGN, Paper No. 83-DET-26.
20.
Armentrout, R. W., Gunter, J. E., and Humphries, R. R., “Dynamic Characteristics of a Jeffcott Rotor Including Foundation Effects,” ASME Paper No. 83-DET-98, ASME Vibration Conference, Dearborn, MI, September 1983.
21.
Subbiah
R.
,
Bhat
R. B.
, and
Sankar
T. S.
, “
Response of Rotors Subjected to Random Support Excitations
,”
ASME, JOURNAL OF VIBRATION, ACOUSTICS, STRESS AND RELIABILITY IN DESIGN
, Vol.
107
, pp.
453
459
, October 1985.
22.
Subbiah
R.
,
Zhou
S.
, and
Rieger
N. F.
, “
The Transient Response of a Three-Level Rotor System Subjected to a Seismic Environment
,”
IMechE Proceedings, Vibrations in Rotating Machinery
, Paper C280/88, Vol.
7
, pp.
635
640
,
1988
.
23.
Ruhl
R. L.
,
Conry
T. F.
, and
Steger
R. L.
, “
Unbalance Response of a Large Rotor-Pedestal-Foundation System Using an Elastic Half-Space Soil Model
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
102
, pp.
311
319
, April 1980.
24.
Glienicke, J., “Experimental Investigation of the Stiffness and Damping Coefficients of Turbine Bearings and Their Application to Instability Prediction,” Jnl. Bearings for Reciprocating and Turbomachinery, IMechE, London, Vol. 181, part 3B, 1966.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.