Developments in simulation technology that enable a qualitatively new virtual prototyping approach to design of mechanical systems are summarized and their integration into an engineering design environment is illustrated. Simulation tools and their enabling technologies are presented in the context of vehicle design, with references to the literature provided. Their implementation for design representation, real-time driver-in-the-loop simulation, dynamic performance simulation, dynamic stress and life prediction, maintainability analysis, design sensitivity analysis, and design optimization is outlined. A testbed comprised of computer aided engineering tools and a design level of fidelity driving simulator that has been developed to demonstrate the feasibility of virtual prototyping simulation for mechanical system design is presented. Two 1994 demonstrations of this capability for vehicle design are presented, to illustrate the state of the technology and to identify challenges that remain in making virtual prototyping simulation an integral part of mechanical system design in US industry.

1.
Anon, 1993, Engineering in the Manufacturing Process, Defense Science Board Task Force Report. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition. Washington, DC 20301-3140.
2.
Chang, K. H., and Choi, K. K., 1993, “Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis and What-If Tool for 3-D Design Applications,” Concurrent Engineering: Tools and Technologies for Mechanical System Design, pp. 737–766, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
3.
Chang, K. H., Choi, K. K., and Perng, J. H., 1992, “Design Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization Tool for Sizing Design Applications,” Fourth AIAA/AIR Force/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Paper No. 92-4789, Cleveland, OH.
4.
Choi, K. K., Wu, J. K., Chang, K. H., Tang, J., and Haug, E. J., 1994, “Large Scale Tracked Vehicle Concurrent Engineering Environment,” Structural Optimization 93, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
5.
Chung
S.
, and
Haug
E. J.
,
1993
, “
Real-Time Simulation of Multibody Dynamics on Shared Memory Multiprocessors
,”
ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
, Vol.
115
, pp.
627
637
.
6.
Ciarelli, K. J., 1990, “Integrated CAE System for Military Vehicle Applications,” Concurrent Engineering of Mechanical Systems, DE-Vol. 22, pp. 15–24 American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
7.
Clark and Fujimoto, 1991, Product Development Performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
8.
Haug, E. J., Kuhl, J. G., and Stoner, J., 1993, “Virtual Prototyping for Military Vehicle Acquisition,” SAE Paper 930848, Journal of Commercial Vehicles.
9.
Haug, E. J., Choi, K. K., and Komkov, V., 1986, Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press, New York.
10.
IEEE Std 1278–1993, IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Protocols for Distributed Interactive Simulation Applications, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York.
11.
Shin
S. H.
,
Yoo
W. S.
, and
Tang
J.
,
1993
, “
Effects of Mode Selection, Scaling, and Orthogonalization in the Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Multibody Systems
,”
Mechanics of Structures and Machines
, Vol.
21
, No.
4
, pp.
507
528
.
12.
Vujosevic, R., 1994, “Development of a Maintainability Analysis Workstation,” 10th ISPE/IFAC International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future (CARS & FOF), 711–716, Ottawa, Canada.
13.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D., 1990, The Machine that Changed the World, Harper Perennial, New York.
14.
Wu
J. K.
,
Choong
F. N.
,
Choi
K. K.
, and
Haug
E. J.
,
1991
, “
Data Model for Simulation-based Design of Mechanical Systems
,”
Int. Journal of System Integration Research and Application
, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, pp.
67
88
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.