This article discusses numerical errors in unsteady flow simulations, which may include round-off, statistical, iterative, and time and space discretization errors. The estimation of iterative and discretization errors and the influence of the initial condition on unsteady flows that become periodic are discussed. In this latter case, the goal is to determine the simulation time required to reduce the influence of the initial condition to negligible levels. Two one-dimensional, unsteady manufactured solutions are used to illustrate the interference between the different types of numerical errors. One solution is periodic and the other includes a transient region before it reaches a steady-state. The results show that for a selected grid and time-step, statistical convergence of the periodic solution may be achieved at significant lower error levels than those of iterative and discretization errors. However, statistical convergence deteriorates when iterative convergence criteria become less demanding, grids are refined, and Courant number increased.For statistically converged solutions of the periodic flow and for the transient solution, iterative convergence criteria required to obtain a negligible influence of the iterative error when compared to the discretization error are more strict than typical values found in the open literature. More demanding criteria are required when the grid is refined and/or the Courant number is increased. When the numerical error is dominated by the iterative error, it is pointless to refine the grid and/or reduce the time-step. For solutions with a numerical error dominated by the discretization error, three different techniques are applied to illustrate how the discretization uncertainty can be estimated, using grid/time refinement studies: three data points at a fixed Courant number; five data points involving three time steps for the same grid and three grids for the same time-step; five data points including at least two grids and two time steps. The latter two techniques distinguish between space and time convergence, whereas the first one combines the effect of the two discretization errors.

References

References
1.
EU
,
2019
, “
The European Project TILDA
,” accessed June 20, 2019, www.hifiled-symposium.eu
2.
Roache
,
P. J.
,
1998
,
Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering
,
Hermosa Publishers
,
Albuquerque, NM
.
3.
Roache
,
P. J.
,
2009
,
Fundamentals of Verification and Validation
,
Hermosa Publishers
,
Albuquerque, NM
.
4.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Roy
,
C. J.
,
2010
,
Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
5.
ASME
,
2007
, “
Guide for the Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. V V10.
6.
ASME
,
2009
, “
Standard for Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. V V20.
7.
AIAA
,
1998
, “
Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations
,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, Standard No. AIAA-G077-1998.
8.
ITTC
,
2017
, “ITTC Quality Manual, Uncertainty Analysis in CFD, 22nd ITTC [C], 1999,” ITTC.
9.
Roache
,
P. J.
,
2002
, “
Code Verification by the Method of the Manufactured Solutions
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
124
(
1
), pp.
4
10
.
10.
Eça
,
L.
, and
Hoekstra
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Evaluation of Numerical Error Estimation Based on Grid Refinement Studies With the Method of the Manufactured Solutions
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
38
(
8
), pp.
1580
1591
.
11.
Eça
,
L.
,
Vaz
,
G.
, and
Hoekstra
,
M.
,
2018
, “
On the Role of Iterative Errors in Unsteady Flow Simulations
,”
Numerical Towing Tank Symposium
(
NuTTS
),
Cortona, Italy
,
Sept. 30–Oct. 2
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328064499_On_the_Role_of_Iterative_Errors_in_Unsteady_Flow_Simulations
12.
Eça
,
L.
, and
Hoekstra
,
M.
,
2014
, “
A Procedure for the Estimation of the Numerical Uncertainty of CFD Calculations Based on Grid Refinement Studies
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
262
, pp.
104
130
.
13.
Eça
,
L.
,
Klaij
,
C. M.
,
Vaz
,
G.
,
Hoekstra
,
M.
, and
Pereira
,
F. S.
,
2016
, “
On Code Verification of RANS Solvers
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
310
(
C
), pp.
418
439
.
You do not currently have access to this content.