Validation assesses the accuracy of a mathematical model by comparing simulation results to experimentally measured quantities of interest. Model validation experiments emphasize obtaining detailed information on all input data needed by the mathematical model, in addition to measuring the system response quantities (SRQs) so that the predictive accuracy of the model can be critically determined. This article proposes a framework for assessing model validation experiments for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) regarding information content, data completeness, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). This framework combines two previously published concepts: the strong-sense model validation experiments and the modeling maturity assessment procedure referred to as the predictive capability maturity method (PCMM). The model validation experiment assessment requirements are captured in a table of six attributes: experimental facility, analog instrumentation and signal processing, boundary and initial conditions, fluid and material properties, test conditions, and measurement of system responses, with four levels of information completeness for each attribute. The specifics of this table are constructed for a generic wind tunnel experiment. Each attribute’s completeness is measured from the perspective of the level of detail needed for input data using direct numerical simulation of the Navier–Stokes equations. While this is an extraordinary and unprecedented requirement for level of detail in a model validation experiment, it is appropriate for critical assessment of modern CFD simulations.
Assessment Criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validation Experiments
An earlier version of this article was presented at the AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, National Harbor, MD, Jan. 13–17, 2014, as Paper No. AIAA-2014-0205.
Manuscript received March 12, 2017; final manuscript received August 31, 2017; published online October 11, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Yassin A. Hassan.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Oberkampf, W. L., and Smith, B. L. (October 11, 2017). "Assessment Criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validation Experiments." ASME. J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. September 2017; 2(3): 031002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037887
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager