Transient convection has been investigated experimentally for the purpose of providing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation benchmark data. A specialized facility for validation benchmark experiments called the rotatable buoyancy tunnel (RoBuT) was used to acquire thermal and velocity measurements of flow over a smooth, vertical heated plate in air. The initial condition was forced convection downward with subsequent transition to mixed convection, ending with natural convection upward after a flow reversal. Data acquisition through the transient was repeated for ensemble-averaged results. With simple flow geometry, validation data were acquired at the benchmark level. All boundary conditions (BCs) were measured and their uncertainties quantified. Temperature profiles on all the four walls and the inlet were measured, as well as as-built test section geometry. Inlet velocity profiles and turbulence levels were quantified using particle image velocimetry (PIV). System response quantities (SRQs) were measured for comparison with CFD outputs and include velocity profiles, wall heat flux, and wall shear stress. Extra effort was invested in documenting and preserving the validation data. Details about the experimental facility, instrumentation, experimental procedure, materials, BCs, and SRQs are made available through this paper. The latter two are available for download while other details are included in this work.

References

References
1.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2014
, “
Assessment Criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation Benchmark Experiments
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2014-0205.
2.
Harris
,
J. R.
,
Lance
,
B. W.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Validation Data for CFD of Forced Convection on a Vertical Flat Plate
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
138
(
1
), p.
011401
.
3.
Lance
,
B. W.
,
Harris
,
J. R.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Validation Benchmark Data for CFD of Mixed Convection on a Vertical Flat Plate
,”
ASME J. Verif., Valid. Uncert. Quantif.
,
1
(
2
), p.
021005
.
4.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Roy
,
C. J.
,
2010
,
Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
5.
ASME
,
2009
, “
Standard for Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME V&V 20-2009.
6.
AIAA
,
1998
, “
Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations
,” American Institute or Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, Report No. AIAA G-077-1998.
7.
He
,
S.
, and
Jackson
,
J. D.
,
2000
, “
A Study of Turbulence Under Conditions of Transient Flow in a Pipe
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
408
, pp.
1
38
.
8.
Hino
,
M.
,
Kashiwayanagi
,
M.
,
Nakayama
,
A.
, and
Hara
,
T.
,
1983
, “
Experiments on the Turbulence Statistics and the Structure of a Reciprocating Oscillatory Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
131
, pp.
363
400
.
9.
Koshkin
,
V.
,
Kalinin
,
E.
,
Dreitser
,
G.
,
Galitseisky
,
B.
, and
Izosimov
,
V.
,
1970
, “
Experimental Study of Nonsteady Convective Heat Transfer in Tubes
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
13
(
8
), pp.
1271
1281
.
10.
Kataoka
,
K.
,
Kawabata
,
T.
, and
Miki
,
K.
,
1975
, “
The Start-Up Response of Pipe Flow to a Step Change in Flow Rate
,”
J. Chem. Eng. Jpn.
,
8
(
4
), pp.
266
271
.
11.
Maruyama
,
T.
,
Kuribayashi
,
T.
, and
Mizushina
,
T.
,
1976
, “
The Structure of the Turbulence in Transient Pipe Flows
,”
J. Chem. Eng. Jpn.
,
9
(
6
), pp.
431
439
.
12.
Rouai
,
N. M.
,
1987
, “
Influence of Buoyancy and Flow Transients on Turbulent Convective Heat Transfer in a Tube
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
13.
Jackson
,
J. D.
,
Büyükalaca
,
O.
, and
He
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Heat Transfer in a Pipe Under Conditions of Transient Turbulent Flow
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
20
(
2
), pp.
115
127
.
14.
Barker
,
A. R.
, and
Williams
,
J. E. F.
,
2000
, “
Transient Measurements of the Heat Transfer Coefficient in Unsteady, Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
43
(
17
), pp.
3197
3207
.
15.
Kays
,
W. M.
,
Crawford
,
M. E.
, and
Weigand
,
B.
,
2012
,
Convective Heat and Mass Transfer
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
16.
Kähler
,
C. J.
,
Sammler
,
B.
, and
Kompenhans
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Generation and Control of Tracer Particles for Optical Flow Investigations in Air
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
33
(
6
), pp.
736
742
.
17.
Touloukian
,
Y. S.
, and
Ho
,
C. Y.
,
1977
, “
Thermophysical Properties of Selected Aerospace Materials Part II: Thermophysical Properties of Seven Materials
,”
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN.
18.
Warner
,
S. O.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2014
, “
Autocorrelation-Based Estimate of Particle Image Density for Diffraction Limited Particle Images
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
,
25
(
6
), p.
065201
.
19.
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Steele
,
W. G.
,
2009
,
Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
20.
Timmins
,
B. H.
,
Wilson
,
B. W.
,
Smith
,
B. L.
, and
Vlachos
,
P. P.
,
2012
, “
A Method for Automatic Estimation of Instantaneous Local Uncertainty in Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
53
(
4
), pp.
1133
1147
.
21.
Wilson
,
B. M.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2013
, “
Taylor-Series and Monte Carlo-Method Uncertainty Estimation of the Width of a Probability Distribution Based on Varying Bias and Random Error
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
,
24
(
3
), p.
035301
.
22.
Wilson
,
B. M.
, and
Smith
,
B. L.
,
2013
, “
Uncertainty on PIV Mean and Fluctuating Velocity Due to Bias and Random Errors
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
,
24
(
3
), p.
035302
.
23.
Kendall
,
A.
, and
Koochesfahani
,
M.
,
2007
, “
A Method for Estimating Wall Friction in Turbulent Wall-bounded Flows
,”
Exp Fluids
,
44
(
5
), pp.
773
780
.
24.
Bevington
,
P. R.
, and
Robinson
,
D. K.
,
2003
,
Data Reduction and Error Analysis
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.