Shroud leakage flow undergoes little change in the tangential velocity as it passes over the shroud. Mixing due to the difference in tangential velocity between the main stream flow and the leakage flow creates a significant proportion of the total loss associated with shroud leakage flow. The unturned leakage flow also causes negative incidence and intensifies the secondary flows in the downstream blade row. This paper describes the experimental results of a concept to turn the rotor shroud leakage flow in the direction of the main blade passage flow in order to reduce the aerodynamic mixing losses. A three-stage air model turbine with low aspect ratio blading was used in this study. A series of different stationary turning vane geometries placed into the rotor shroud exit cavity downstream of each rotor blade row was tested. A significant improvement in flow angle and loss in the downstream stator blade rows was measured together with an increase in turbine brake efficiency of 0.4 %.

1.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, 2000, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-475.
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Johnson
,
C. G.
, 1976, “
An Experimental Study of the Tip Leakage Flow Around Shrouded Turbine Blades
,” CEGB Report No. R/M/N848, Marchwood Engineering Laboratories, UK.
3.
Giboni
,
A.
,
Wolter
,
K.
,
Menter
,
J. R. P.
, and
Pfost
,
H.
, 2004, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into the Unsteady Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53024.
4.
Peters
,
P.
,
Menter
,
J. R.
,
Pfost
,
H.
,
Giboni
,
A.
, and
Wolter
,
K.
, 2005, “
Unsteady Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Downstream Stator Flow in a Shrouded 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68065.
5.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2004, “
Making Use of Labyrinth Interaction Flow
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53797.
6.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Brouillet
,
B.
, and
de Vito
,
L.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38025.
7.
Lewis
,
K. L.
, 1993, “
The Aerodynamics of Shrouded Multistage Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Engineering Department.
8.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
, 2005, “
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modeling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68459.
9.
Bindon
,
J. P.
, 1979, “
The Effect of Hub Inlet Boundary Layer Skewing on the Endwall Shear Flow in an Annular Turbine Cascade
,” ASME Paper No. 79-GT-13.
10.
Boletis
,
E.
,
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, and
Van Hove
,
W.
, 1983, “
Effects of a Skewed Inlet End Wall Boundary Layer on the 3-D Flow Field in and Annular Turbine Cascade
,” AGARD Conference Viscous Effects in Turbomachines, Copenhagen.
11.
Walsh
,
J. A.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
, 1990, “
Inlet Skew and the Growth of Secondary Losses and Vorticity in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
110
, pp.
633
642
.
You do not currently have access to this content.