Abstract

Trailing edge loss typically accounts for a third of the profile loss of a transonic turbine blade. In this paper, two dominant influencing factors—boundary layer state and trailing edge wedge angle—are quantified using a combined experimental (single airfoil transonic tests) and computational (wall-resolved LES) approach. Three key findings are reported. First, the switch between two flow regimes—detached vortex shedding and transonic vortex shedding—as the Reynolds number is increased, is identified and explained. It is shown that the transition of the pressure surface boundary layer drives the switch from the former to the latter; this change is associated with a jump in loss of close to 100%. The switch is also shown to affect the base pressure distribution around the trailing edge, changing it from uniform, with an isobaric dead-air region, to non-uniform. Second, the influence of the trailing edge wedge angle is explored. It is found that higher wedge angles can offer performance benefits in both loss and base pressure—with a change from 8 deg to 14 deg geometry providing up to a 29% reduction in an overall loss for the geometry tested. Finally, as these findings are the result of changes to the unsteady flow phenomena around the trailing edge, they would not be picked up by current low-fidelity, steady design tools. A method is proposed to use data, such as that presented in this paper, to improve low-fidelity modeling.

References

1.
Nash
,
J. F.
,
Quincey
,
V. G.
, and
Callinan
,
J.
,
1963
,
Experiments of Two-Dimensional Base Flow at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
. Technical Report 3427, Aeronautical Research Council.
2.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
Richard
,
H.
, and
Desse
,
J. -M.
,
2003
, “
Turbine Blade Trailing Edge Flow Characteristics at High Subsonic Outlet Mach Number
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
298
309
.
3.
Melzer
,
A. P.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2019
, “
The Role of Vortex Shedding in the Trailing Edge Loss of Transonic Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
4
), p.
041001
.
4.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture: Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(
4
), pp.
621
656
.
5.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, and
Heinemann
,
H.
,
1990
, “
The Influence of Boundary Layer State on Vortex Shedding From Flat Plates and Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
(
2
), pp.
181
187
.
6.
Prust
,
H. W.
, and
Helon
,
R. M.
,
1972
,
Effect of Trailing Edge Geometry and Thickness on The Performance of Certain Turbine Stator Blading
. Technical Report D-6637, NASA.
7.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
Stanislas
,
M.
, and
Snoeck
,
J.
,
1980
, “
The Base Pressure Problem in Transonic Turbine Cascades
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
102
(
3
), pp.
711
718
.
8.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
1983
, “
The Influence of Trailing Edge Ejection on the Base Pressure in Transonic Turbine Cascades
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
105
(
2
), pp.
215
222
.
9.
Kapteijn
,
C.
,
Amecke
,
J.
, and
Michelassi
,
V.
,
1996
, “
Aerodynamic Performance of a Transonic Turbine Guide Vane With Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection: Part I–Experimental Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
(
3
), pp.
519
528
.
10.
Deckers
,
M.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1997
, “
The Aerodynamics of Trailing-Edge–Cooled Transonic Turbine Blades: Part 1–Experimental Approach
”.
Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Marine; Turbomachinery; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air.
11.
Xu
,
L.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1988
, “
The Base Pressure and Loss of a Family of Four Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
110
(
1
), pp.
9
17
.
12.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
, and
Watson
,
P. J.
,
1976
, “
A Closed Circuit Variable Density Air Supply for Turbomachinery Research
”.
Volume 1A: General of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air.
13.
Brandvik
,
T.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2010
, “
An Accelerated 3D Navier–Stokes Solver for Flows in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
2
), p.
021025
.
14.
Jameson
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid, With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings
,”
AIAA 10th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Honolulu, HI
,
June 24–26
.
15.
Brind
,
J.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2021
, “
Modelling Turbine Acoustic Impedance
,”
Int. J. Turbomach. Propul. Power
,
6
(
2
), p.
18
.
16.
Tucker
,
P. G.
,
2016
,
Advanced Computational Fluid and Aerodynamics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
17.
Wheeler
,
A. P. S.
,
Sandberg
,
R. D.
,
Sandham
,
N. D.
,
Pichler
,
R.
,
Michelassi
,
V.
, and
Laskowski
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Direct Numerical Simulations of a High-Pressure Turbine Vane
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
7
), p.
071003
.
18.
Jarrin
,
N.
,
Benhamadouche
,
S.
,
Laurence
,
D.
, and
Prosser
,
R.
,
2006
, “
A Synthetic-Eddy-Method for Generating Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulations
,”
Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow
,
27
(
4
), pp.
585
593
.
19.
Schlichting (Deceased)
,
H.
, and
Gersten
,
K.
,
2016
,
Boundary-Layer Theory
, 9th ed.,
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
.
20.
Lin
,
D.
,
Su
,
X.
, and
Yuan
,
X.
,
2016
, “
Delayed Detached-Eddy Simulations of a High Pressure Turbine Vane
”.
Volume 2D: Turbomachinery of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air.
V02DT44A018.
21.
Youngren
,
H.
, and
Drela
,
M.
,
1991
, “
Viscous/Inviscid Method for Preliminary Design of Transonic Cascades
,”
27th Joint Propulsion Conference
,
Sacramento, CA
,
June 24–26
.
You do not currently have access to this content.