Abstract

Blade envelopes offer a set of data-driven tolerance guidelines for manufactured components based on aerodynamic analysis. In Part I of this two-part paper, a workflow for the formulation of blade envelopes is described and demonstrated. In Part II, this workflow is extended to accommodate multiple objectives. This allows engineers to prescribe manufacturing guidelines that take into account multiple performance criteria. The quality of a manufactured blade can be correlated with features derived from the distribution of primal flow quantities over the surface. We show that these distributions can be accounted for in the blade envelope using vector-valued models derived from discrete surface flow measurements. Our methods result in a set of variables that allows flexible and independent control over multiple flow characteristics and performance metrics, similar in spirit to inverse design methods. The augmentations to the blade envelope workflow presented in this paper are demonstrated on the LS89 turbine blade, focusing on the control of loss, mass flow, and the isentropic Mach number distribution. Finally, we demonstrate how blade envelopes can be used to visualize invariant designs by producing a 3D render of the envelope using 3D modeling software.

References

1.
Wong
,
C. Y.
,
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Scillitoe
,
A.
,
Duncan
,
A.
, and
Parks
,
G. T.
,
2020
, “
Blade Envelopes Part I: Concept and Methodology
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
2.
Arts
,
T.
, and
Lambert de Rouvroit
,
M.
,
1992
, “
Aero-Thermal Performance of a Two-Dimensional Highly Loaded Transonic Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane: A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
147
154
.
3.
Torreguitart
,
S.
,
Verstraete
,
T.
, and
Mueller
,
L.
,
2018
, “
Optimization of the LS89 Axial Turbine Profile Using a CAD and Adjoint Based Approach
,”
Int. J. Turbomach., Propul. Power
,
3
(
3
), p.
20
.
4.
Montanelli
,
H.
,
Montagnac
,
M.
, and
Gallard
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Gradient Span Analysis Method: Application to the Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
9
), p.
091006
.
5.
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Yuchi
,
S.
,
Parks
,
G.
, and
Shahpar
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Supporting Multi-Point Fan Design With Dimension Reduction
,”
Aeronaut. J.
,
124
(
1279
), pp.
1371
1398
.
6.
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Shahpar
,
S.
,
Constantine
,
P. G.
,
Parks
,
G. T.
, and
Adams
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Turbomachinery Active Subspace Performance Maps
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
4
), p.
041003
.
7.
Clark
,
C. J.
,
2019
, “
A Step Towards An Intelligent Aerodynamic Design Process
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
June
.
8.
Golub
,
G. H.
, and
van Loan
,
C. F.
,
2013
,
Matrix Computations
, 4th ed.,
Johns Hopkins University Press
, Baltimore, MD.
9.
Wong
,
C. Y.
,
Seshadri
,
P.
,
Parks
,
G. T.
, and
Girolami
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Embedded Ridge Approximations
,”
Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
372
, p.
113383
.
10.
Zahm
,
O.
,
Constantine
,
P. G.
,
Prieur
,
C.
, and
Marzouk
,
Y. M.
,
2020
, “
Gradient-Based Dimension Reduction of Multivariate Vector-Valued Functions
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
,
42
(
1
), pp.
A534
A558
. Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
11.
Seshadri
,
P.
, and
Parks
,
G.
,
2017
, “
Effective-Quadratures (EQ): Polynomials for Computational Engineering Studies
,”
J. Open Source Soft.
,
2
(
11
), pp.
166
166
.
12.
Blender Online Community
,
2018
,
Blender – A 3D Modelling and Rendering Package
,
Blender Foundation, Stichting Blender Foundation
,
Amsterdam
.
You do not currently have access to this content.