Abstract

The flow distortion at core engine entry for a variable pitch fan (VPF) in reverse thrust mode is described from a realistic flow field obtained using an integrated airframe-engine model. The model includes the VPF, core entry splitter, complete bypass nozzle flow path wrapped in a nacelle, and installed to an airframe in landing configuration through a pylon. A moving ground plane to mimic the rolling runway is included. 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solutions are generated at two combinations of VPF stagger angle and rotational speed settings for the entire aircraft landing run from 140 to 20 knots. The internal reverse thrust flow field is characterized by bypass nozzle lip separation, pylon wake, and recirculation of flow turned back from the VPF. A portion of the reverse stream flow turns 180 deg with separation at the splitter leading edge to feed the core engine. The core engine feed flow exhibits circumferential and radial nonuniformities that depend on the reverse flow development at different landing speeds. The temporal dependence of the distorted flow features is also explored by an unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) analysis. Total pressure and swirl angle distortion descriptors, as defined by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) S-16 committee, and, total pressure loss into the core engine are described for the core feed flow at different operating conditions and landing speeds. It is observed that the radial intensity of total pressure distortion is critical to core engine operation, while the circumferential intensity is within acceptable limits. Therefore, the baseline sharp splitter edge is replaced by two larger rounded splitter edges of radii, ∼0.1x and ∼0.2x times the core duct height. This was found to reduce the radial intensity of total pressure distortion to acceptable levels. The description of the installed core feed flow distortion, as described in this study, is necessary to ascertain stable core engine operation, which powers the VPF in reverse thrust mode.

References

1.
Samanich
,
N. E.
,
Reemsnyder
,
D. C.
, and
Bloomer
,
H. E.
,
1980
, “
Reverse Thrust Performance of the QCSEE Variable Pitch Turbofan Engine
,”
SAE Trans.
,
89
(
Section 4: 801147–801431
), pp.
3623
3650
. 10.4271/801196
2.
Schaefer
,
J. W.
,
Sagerser
,
D. R.
, and
Stakolich
,
E. G.
,
1977
,
“Dynamics of High-Bypass-Engine Thrust Reversal Using a Variable-Pitch Fan”
,
NASA
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NASA TM X-3524.
3.
Hobbs
,
D. E.
,
Neubert
,
R. J.
,
Malmborg
,
E. W.
,
Philbrick
,
D. H.
, and
Spear
,
D. A.
,
1995
,
“Low Noise Research Fan Stage Design”
,
NASA
,
Washington, DC
,
Report No. NASA-CR-195382
.
4.
Tweedt
,
D. L.
,
2014
,
Computational Aerodynamic Simulations of an 840ft/sec Tip Speed Advanced Ducted Propulsor Fan System Model for Acoustic Methods Assessment and Development
,
NASA
,
Washington, DC
,
Report No. NASA/CR-2014-218129
.
5.
Williams
,
T. S.
, and
Hall
,
C. A.
,
2019
, “
Reverse Thrust Aerodynamics of Variable Pitch Fans
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
141
(
8
), p.
081008
. 10.1115/1.4043139
6.
Rajendran
,
D. J.
, and
Pachidis
,
V.
,
2019
, “
Fan Flow Field in an Installed Variable Pitch Fan Operating in Reverse Thrust for a Range of Aircraft Landing Speeds
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
10
), p.
101018
. 10.1115/1.4044686
7.
Rajendran
,
D. J.
,
Bentley
,
D.
,
Aguirre
,
H. A.
,
Tunstall
,
R.
, and
Pachidis
,
V.
,
2020
, “
Development of a Research Model to Study the Operability of a Variable Pitch Fan Aero Engine in Reverse Thrust
,”
Global Power & Propulsion Society Chania 2020 Proceedings
,
GPPS
,
Chania
, 10.33737/gpps20-tc-43
8.
SAE S-16 Technical Committee
,
1978
,
Gas Turbine Engine Inlet Flow Distortion Guidelines
,
Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.
,
Warrendale, PA
.
9.
SAE S-16 Technical Committee
,
1983
, “
Inlet Total-Pressure Distortion Considerations for Gas Turbine Engines
,”
SAE. Report-AIR1419
.
10.
Davis
,
M. W.
, Jr.
,
Hale
,
A. A.
, and
Klepper
,
J.
,
2010
, “
40 Years of AEDC Development, Evolution and Application of Numerical Simulations for Integrated Test and Evaluation of Turbine Engine Turbomachinery Operability Issues
,”
Aerospace Testing Alliance, Arnold AFB TN, No. AEDC-TR-09-T-19
.
11.
Beale
,
D.
,
Davis
,
M.
, and
Sirbaugh
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Requirements and Advances in Simulating Aircraft Inlet Total Pressure Distortion in Turbine Engine Ground Tests
,
ASME Paper No. GT2006-90038
.
12.
Davis
,
M.
, Jr.
,
1991
, “
Parametric Investigation Into the Combined Effects of Pressure and Temperature Distortion on Compression System Stability
,
AIAA Paper No. AIAA-91-1895-CP
.
13.
Hercock
,
R. G.
, and
Williams
,
D. D.
,
1974
, “
Distortion-Induced Engine Instability Aerodynamic Response
,”
AGARD, LS72-Paper, 3
.
14.
Milner
,
E. J.
,
1977
,
Analytical Prediction of the Performance and Stability of a J85-13 Compressor With Distorted Inlet Flow
,
NASA
,
Washington, DC
,
Report No. NASA-TM-X-3515
.
15.
Hah
,
C.
,
Rabe
,
D. C.
,
Sullivan
,
T. J.
, and
Wadia
,
A. R.
,
1998
, “
Effects of Inlet Distortion on the Flow Field in a Transonic Compressor Rotor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
2
), pp.
233
246
. 10.1115/1.2841398
16.
Soeder
,
R. H.
, and
Mehalic
,
C. M.
,
1984
,
Effect of Combined Pressure and Temperature Distortion Orientation on High-Bypass-Ratio Turbofan Engine Stability
,
NASA
,
Washington, DC
,
Report No. NASA TM 83771
.
17.
Cousins
,
W. T.
, and
Davis
,
M. W.
,
2011
, “
Evaluating Complex Inlet Distortion With a Parallel Compressor Model: Part 1—Concepts, Theory, Extensions, and Limitations
,”
ASME Paper No. GT2011-45067
.
18.
Davis
,
M. W.
, and
Cousins
,
W. T.
,
2011
, “
Evaluating Complex Inlet Distortion With a Parallel Compressor Model: Part 2—Applications to Complex Patterns
,”
ASME Paper No. GT2011-45068
.
You do not currently have access to this content.