Slot film cooling is a popular choice for trailing edge (TE) cooling in high pressure (HP) turbine blades because it can provide more uniform film coverage compared to discrete film cooling holes. The slot geometry consists of a cutback in the blade pressure side connected through rectangular openings to the internal coolant feed passage. The numerical simulation of this kind of film cooling flows is challenging due to the presence of flow interactions such as step flow separation, coolant-mainstream mixing, and heat transfer. The geometry under consideration is a cutback surface at the trailing edge of a constant cross-section aerofoil. The cutback surface is divided into three sections separated by narrow lands. The experiments are conducted in a high-speed cascade in Oxford Osney Thermo-Fluids Laboratory at Reynolds and Mach number distributions representative of engine conditions. The capability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods to capture these flow phenomena is investigated in this paper. The isentropic Mach number and film effectiveness are compared between CFD and pressure sensitive paint (PSP) data. When compared with the steady k − ω shear stress transport (SST) method, scale adaptive simulation (SAS) can agree better with the measurement. Furthermore, the profiles of kinetic energy, production, and shear stress obtained by the steady and SAS methods are compared to identify the main source of inaccuracy in RANS simulations. The SAS method is better to capture the unsteady coolant–hot gas mixing and vortex shedding at the slot lip. The cross flow is found to affect the film significantly as it triggers flow separation near the lands and reduces the effectiveness. The film is nonsymmetric with respect to the half-span plane, and different flow features are present in each slot. The effect of mass flow ratio (MFR) on flow pattern and coolant distribution is also studied. The profiles of velocity, kinetic energy, and production of turbulent energy are compared among the slots in detail. The MFR not only affects the magnitude but also changes the sign of production.

References

References
1.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
Arts
,
T.
,
Denos
,
R.
, and
Martelli
,
R.
,
1996
, “
Investigation of the Flow Field Downstream of a Turbine Trailing Edge Cooled Nozzle Guide Vane
,”
J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
291
300
.
2.
Schobeiri
,
M. T.
, and
Pappu
,
K. R.
,
1999
, “
Optimization of Trailing Edge Ejection Mixing Losses a Theoretical and Experimental Study
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
,
121
, pp.
118
125
.
3.
Chen
,
Y.
,
Matalanis
,
C. G.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2008
, “
High Resolution PIV Measurements Around a Model Turbine Blade Trailing Edge Film-Cooling Breakout
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
44
, pp.
199
209
.
4.
Benson
,
M. J.
,
Elkins
,
C. J.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2011
, “
Measurements of 3D Velocity and Scalar Field for a Film-Cooled Airfoil Trailing Edge
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
51
, pp.
443
455
.
5.
Ling
,
J.
,
Yapa
,
S. D.
,
Benson
,
M. J.
,
Elkins
,
C. J.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2013
, “
3D Velocity and Scalar Field Measurements of an Airfoil Trailing Edge With Slot Film Cooling: The Effect of an Internal Structure in the Slot
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
,
031018
.
6.
Holloway
,
D. S.
,
Leylek
,
J. H.
, and
Buck
,
F. A.
,
2002
, “
Pressure-Side Bleed Film Cooling Part I—Steady Framework for Experimental and Computational Results
,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30471.
7.
Holloway
,
D. S.
,
Leylek
,
J. H.
, and
Buck
,
F. A.
,
2002
, “
Pressure-Side Bleed Film Cooling Part II-Unsteady Framework for Experimental and Computational Results
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
June 3–6
, ASME Paper No. GT2002-30472.
8.
Ravelli
,
S.
, and
Barigozzi
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Application of Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods to Trailing Edge Cutback Film Cooling
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
,
121006
.
9.
Schneider
,
H.
,
von Terzi
,
D.
, and
Bauer
,
H. J.
,
2010
, “
Large-Eddy Simulations of Trailing-Edge Cutback Film Cooling at Low Blowing Ratio
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
31
, pp.
767
775
.
10.
Irwin
,
H. P. A. H.
,
1973
, “
Measurements in a Self-Preserving Plane Wall Jet in a Positive Pressure Gradient
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
61
, pp.
33
63
.
11.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
,
1983
, “
The Turbulent Wall Jet-Measurements and Modeling
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
15
, pp.
429
459
.
12.
Gurram
,
N.
,
Ireland
,
P. T.
,
Wong
,
T. H.
, and
Self
,
K. P.
,
2016
, “
Study of Film Cooling in the Trailing Edge Region of a Turbine Rotor Blade in High Speed Flow Using Pressure Sensitive Paint
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Seoul, South Korea
,
June 13–17
, ASME Paper No. GT2016-57356.
13.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
Kuntz
,
M.
, and
Bender
,
R.
,
2003
, “
A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model for Turbulent Flow Predictions
,”
41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, Nevada
,
Jan.
AIAA Paper No. 2003-0767.
14.
Menter
,
F. R.
, and
Egorov
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model Using Two-Equation Models
,”
43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, Nevada
,
Jan. 10–13
, AIAA Paper No. 2005-1095.
15.
Moinier
,
P.
,
Muller
,
J.
, and
Giles
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Edge-Based Multigrid and Preconditioning for Hybrid Grids
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
, pp.
1954
1960
.
16.
Moinier
,
P.
, and
Giles
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Stability Analysis of Preconditioned Approximations of the Euler Equations on Unstructured Meshes
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
178
, pp.
498
519
.
17.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
, pp.
1598
1605
.
18.
Menter
,
F. R.
, and
Egorov
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
SAS Turbulence Modelling of Technical Flows
,”
Proceedings of the DLES-6 Conference
,
Poitiers, France
,
Sept. 12–14
.
19.
Ivanova
,
E.
, and
Laskowski
,
G. M.
,
2014
, “
LES and Hybrid RANS/LES of a Fundamental Trailing Edge
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Düsseldorf, Germany
,
June 16–20
, ASME Paper No. GT2014-25906.
You do not currently have access to this content.