The aeroelastic prediction of blade forcing is still a very important topic in turbomachinery design. Usually, the wake from an upstream airfoil and the potential field from a downstream airfoil are considered as the main disturbances. In recent years, it became evident that in addition to those two mechanisms, Tyler–Sofrin modes, also called scattered or spinning modes, may have a significant impact on blade forcing. It was recently shown in literature that in multirow configurations, not only the next but also the next but one blade row is very important as it may create a large circumferential forcing variation, which is fixed in the rotating frame of reference. In the present paper, a study of these effects is performed on the basis of a quasi three-dimensional (3D) multirow and multipassage compressor configuration. For the analysis, a harmonic balancing code, which was developed by DLR Cologne, is used for various setups and the results are compared to full-annulus unsteady calculations. It is shown that the effect of the circumferentially different blade excitation is mainly contributed by the Tyler–Sofrin modes and not to blade-to-blade variation in the steady flow field. The influence of various clocking positions, coupling schemes and number of harmonics onto the forcing is investigated. It is also shown that along a speed-line in the compressor map, the blade-to-blade forcing variation may change significantly. In addition, multirow flutter calculations are performed, showing the influence of the upstream and downstream blade row onto aerodynamic damping. The effect of these forcing variations onto random mistuning effects is investigated in the second part of the paper.

References

References
1.
Silkowski
,
P. D.
, and
Hall
,
K. C.
,
1998
, “
A Coupled Mode Analysis of Unsteady Multistage Flows in Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(3), pp.
410
421
.
2.
Li
,
H. D.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2005
, “
Blade Aerodynamic Damping Variation With Rotor-Stator Gap—A Computational Approach Using Single-Passage Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
127
(3), pp.
573
579
.
3.
Hall
,
K. C.
, and
Ekici
,
K.
,
2005
, “
Multistage Coupling for Unsteady Flows in Turbomachinery
,”
AIAA J.
,
43
(
3
), pp.
624
632
.
4.
Namba
,
M.
, and
Kubo
,
A.
,
2008
, “Aerodynamically Coupled Flutter of Multiple Blade Rows,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50315.
5.
Rahmati
,
M. T.
,
He
,
L.
, and
Li
,
Y. S.
,
2014
, “
Multi-Row Interference Effects on Blade Aeromechanics in Compressor and Turbine Stages
,”
13th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT)
, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 11–14, Paper No. S9-5.
6.
Vahdati
,
M.
,
Smith
,
N.
, and
Zhao
,
F.
,
2015
, “
Influence of Intake on Fan Blade Flutter
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
8
), p.
081002
.
7.
Smith
,
N. R.
,
Murray
,
W. L.
, III
, and
Key
,
N. L.
,
2015
, “
Considerations for Measuring Compressor Aerodynamic Excitations Including Rotor Wakes and Tip Leakage Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
3
), p.
031008
.
8.
Besem
,
F.
,
Kielb
,
R. E.
,
Key
,
N. L.
,
Galpin
,
P.
, and
Zori
,
L.
,
2016
, “
Mistuned Forced Response Predictions of an Embedded Rotor in a Multistage Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
6
), p.
061003
.
9.
Schrape
,
S.
,
Giersch
,
T.
,
Nipkau
,
J.
,
Stapelfeldt
,
S.
, and
Mück
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Tyler-Sofrin Modes in Axial High Pressure Compressor Forced Response Analyses
,”
14th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT)
, Stockholm, Sweden, Sept. 8–11, Paper No. S2-3.
10.
Stummann
,
S.
,
Jeschke
,
P.
, and
Metzler
,
T.
,
2015
, “Circumferentially Non-Uniform Flow in the Rear Stage of a Multistage Compressor,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42935.
11.
Junge
,
L.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Jeschke
,
P.
, and
Frey
,
C.
,
2015
, “On the Application of Frequency-Domain Methods to Multistage Turbomachinery,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42936.
12.
Li
,
H.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2003
, “
Blade Count and Clocking Effects on Three-Blade row Interactions in a Transonic Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
4
), pp.
632
640
.
13.
Vilmin
,
S.
,
Lorrain
,
E.
,
Debrabandere
,
F.
,
Tartinville
,
B.
,
Capron
,
A.
, and
Hirsch
,
C.
,
2013
, “The Nonlinear Harmonic Method Applied to the Combined Effects of Multi-Row Unsteady Flows,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94847.
14.
Subramanian
,
V.
,
Custer
,
C. H.
,
Weiss
,
J. M.
, and
Hall
,
K. C.
,
2013
, “Unsteady Simulation of a Two-Stage Cooled High Pressure Turbine Using an Efficient Non-Linear Harmonic Balance Method,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2013-94574.
15.
Porter
,
C.
,
Orkwis
,
P. D.
,
Goerig
,
T.
,
Wood
,
T.
, and
Wojno
,
J.
,
2016
, “In-Duct Assessment of a Linearized Unsteady Navier-Stokes Scheme for Compressor Tone Noise,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2016-2843.
16.
Miyazawa
,
H.
,
Furusawa
,
T.
,
Yamamoto
,
S.
,
Sasao
,
Y.
, and
Ooyama
,
H.
,
2016
, “Unsteady Force on Multi-Stage and Multi-Passage Turbine Long Blade Rows Induced by Wet-Steam Flows,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56360.
17.
Gross
,
J.
,
Krack
,
M.
, and
Schoenenborn
,
H.
,
2017
, “Analysis of the Effect of Multi-Row and Multipassage Aerodynamic Interaction on the Forced Response Variation in a Compressor Configuration—Part II: Effects of Additional Structural Mistuning,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63019.
18.
Eulitz
,
F.
,
Engel
,
K.
,
Nuernberger
,
D.
,
Schmitt
,
S.
, and
Yamamoto
,
K.
,
1998
, “
On Recent Advances of a Parallel Time-Accurate Navier–Stokes Solver for Unsteady Turbomachinery Flow
,”
Fourth ECCOMAS
, Athens, Greece, Sept. 7–11, pp.
252
258
.
19.
Nuernberger
,
D.
,
Eulitz
,
F.
,
Schmitt
,
S.
, and
Zachcial
,
A.
,
2001
, “Recent Progress in the Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Viscous Multistage Turbomachinery Flow,” International Society of Air Breathing Engines (ISABE), Gothenburg, Sweden, Sept. 12–16, Paper No. ISABE-2001-1081.
20.
Engel
,
K.
,
Zscherp
,
C.
,
Wolfrum
,
N.
,
Nuernberger
,
D.
, and
Kuegeler
,
E.
,
2009
, “CFD Simulations of the TP400 IPC in Off-Design Operating Conditions,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-60324.
21.
Frey
,
C.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Kersken
,
H.-P.
, and
Voigt
,
C.
,
2014
, “A Harmonic Balancing Technique for Multistage Turbomachinery Applications,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25230.
22.
Frey
,
C.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
, and
Kersken
,
H.-P.
,
2015
, “Simulations of Unsteady Blade Row Interactions Using Linear and Non-Linear Frequency Domain Methods,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-43453.
23.
Tyler
,
J. M.
, and
Sofrin
,
T. G.
,
1962
, “
Axial Flow Compressor Noise Studies
,”
SAE
Paper No. 620532.
24.
Schoenenborn
,
H.
, and
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
2014
, “Comparison of Non-Linear and Linearized CFD Analysis of the Stator-Rotor Interaction of a Compressor Stage,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25256.
25.
Morfey
,
C. L.
,
1971
, “
Sound Transmission and Generation in Ducts With Flow
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
14
(
1
), pp.
37
55
.
You do not currently have access to this content.