The primary contribution of this research is to clarify the aerodynamic performance of a novel lightweight turbine blade with internal cooling passage and external film cooling, which is invented aiming at drastic weight reduction of a cooled blade. With a considerably thinner airfoil, a significant separation region is formed along the pressure side, and therefore, aerodynamic performance with such a flow field should be investigated. First, the lightweight-cooled airfoil is designed. In the design process, a conventional thick airfoil is first defined as a baseline. With the baseline airfoil, only the mid and rear parts of pressure side profile are redesigned to thin the airfoil without any change in the suction side geometry. The airfoil geometry is optimized so as not to bring significant aerodynamic loss increase. In this numerical optimization, the airfoil shape is gradually changed and evaluated step-by-step. In every step, an adjoint variable method is used to seek better airfoil shape, and then, the generated new shape is evaluated with full Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) calculation. This iteration is repeated until any further recognizable weight reduction cannot be obtained without sensitive pressure loss increase and/or the airfoil shape reaches some geometrical constraints. The resultant optimized airfoil is approximately 20% lighter than the baseline hollow airfoil without any noticeable change in aerodynamic loss in the numerical solution. Next, the optimized airfoil is tested in a high-speed linear cascade rig to verify its aerodynamic performance. The baseline airfoil is also tested for comparison. The rig is composed of six airfoil passages. The compressed air is supplied to the cascade and discharges to the atmospheric exhaust chamber. The air is also heated up to about 540 K upstream of the cascade. The cascade exit Mach number at the design point is 1.25, while in the experiment other several off-design conditions are also tested to check if there is any Mach number sensitivity. At the design point, the optimized lightweight airfoil shows less total pressure loss compared to the baseline airfoil. Also, at any other off-design Mach number conditions tested, the magnitude of the pressure loss is less with the lightweight airfoil. These results verify that the proposed airfoil does not only bring a considerable weight advantage but also compares favorably with the conventional airfoil in aerodynamic performance.

References

References
1.
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Howell
,
R. J.
,
2005
, “
The Role of Transition in High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbines for Aeroengines
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
41
(
6
), pp.
419
454
.
2.
Haselbach
,
F.
,
Schiffer
,
H.-P.
,
Horsman
,
M.
,
Dressen
,
S.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
Read
,
S.
,
2002
, “
The Application of Ultra High Lift Blading in the BR715 LP Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
1
), pp.
45
51
.
3.
Howell
,
R. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Schulte
,
V.
,
Stieger
,
R. D.
,
Schiffer
,
H.-P.
,
Haselbach
,
F.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
2002
, “
Boundary Layer Development in the BR710 and BR715 LP Turbines—The Implementation of High-Lift and Ultra-High-Lift Concepts
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
3
), pp.
385
392
.
4.
Corral
,
R.
,
Gallardo
,
J. M.
, and
Martel
,
C.
,
2009
, “
A Conceptual Flutter Analysis of a Packet of Vanes Using a Mass-Spring Model
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
2
), p.
021016
.
5.
Calzada
,
P.
, and
Alonso
,
A.
,
2003
, “
Numerical Investigation of Heat Transfer in Turbine Cascades With Separated Flows
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
260
266
.
6.
Wang
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Integrated Aerodynamics Design and Analysis of Turbine Blades
,”
Adv. Eng. Software
,
68
, pp.
9
18
.
7.
Klinger
,
H.
,
Lazik
,
W.
, and
Wunderlich
,
T.
, “
The Engine 3E Core Engine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50679.
8.
Yamawaki
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Thin-Walled, Lightweight Cooled Turbine Blade
,”
U.S. Patent No. 6926499
.
9.
Okita
,
Y.
,
Nakamata
,
C.
,
Kamiya
,
H.
, and
Kumada
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Film Cooling for Slot Injection in Separated Flows
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68119.
10.
Okita
,
Y.
,
Nakamata
,
C.
,
Kumada
,
M.
, and
Ikeda
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Film Cooling in a Separated Flow Field on a Novel Lightweight Turbine Blade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
3
), p.
031003
.
11.
Fluent
,
2013
, “
Fluent Manual Version 14.5
,” Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH.
12.
ASME
,
1998
, “
Test Uncertainty: Instruments and Apparatus
,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. PTC 19.1-1998.
You do not currently have access to this content.