Highly loaded impellers, typically used in turbocharger and gas turbine applications, exhaust an unsteady, transonic flow that is nonuniform across the span and pitch and swirling at angles approaching tangential. With the exception of the flow angle, conflicting data exist regarding whether these attributes have substantial influence on the performance of the downstream diffuser. This paper quantifies the relative importance of the flow angle, Mach number, nonuniformity, and unsteadiness on diffuser performance, through diffuser experiments in a compressor stage and in a rotating swirling flow test rig. This is combined with steady and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) computations. The test article is a pressure ratio 5 turbocharger compressor with an airfoil vaned diffuser. The swirling flow rig is able to generate rotor outflow conditions representative of the compressor except for the periodic pitchwise unsteadiness and fits a 0.86 scale diffuser and volute. In both rigs, the time-mean impeller outflow is mapped across a diffuser pitch using miniaturized traversing probes developed for the purpose. Across approximately two-thirds of the stage operating range, diffuser performance is well correlated to the average impeller outflow angle when the metric used is effectiveness, which describes the pressure recovery obtained relative to the maximum possible given the average inflow angle and Mach number and the vane exit metal angle. Utilizing effectiveness captures density changes through the diffuser at higher Mach numbers; a 10% increase in pressure recovery is observed as the inlet Mach number is increased from 0.5 to 1. Further, effectiveness is shown to be largely independent of the time-averaged spanwise and unsteady pitchwise nonuniformity from the rotor; this independence is reflective of the strong mixing processes that occur in the diffuser inlet region. The observed exception is for operating points with high time-averaged vane incidence. Here, it is hypothesized that temporary excursions into high-loss flow regimes cause a nonlinear increase in loss as large unsteady angle variations pass by from the rotor. Given that straight-channel diffuser design charts typically used in preliminary radial vaned diffuser design capture neither streamtube area changes from impeller exit to the diffuser throat nor vane incidence effects, their utility is limited. An alternative approach, utilizing effectiveness and vane leading edge incidence, is proposed.

References

References
1.
Reneau
,
L.
,
Johnston
,
J.
, and
Kline
,
S.
,
1967
, “
Performance and Design of Straight, Two-Dimensional Diffusers
,”
J. Basic Eng.
,
89
(
1
), pp.
141
150
.
2.
Japikse
,
D.
,
1996
,
Centrifugal Compressor Design and Performance
,
Concepts ETI
, Wilder, VT.
3.
Filipenco
,
V. G.
,
Deniz
,
S.
,
Johnston
,
J. M.
,
Greitzer
,
E. M.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
2000
, “
Effects of Inlet Flow Field Conditions on the Performance of Centrifugal Compressor Diffusers—Part 1: Discrete-Passage Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
1
), pp.
1
10
.
4.
Deniz
,
S.
,
Greitzer
,
E. M.
, and
Cumpsty
,
N. A.
,
2000
, “
Effects of Inlet Flow Field Conditions on the Performance of Centrifugal Compressor Diffusers—Part 2: Straight-Channel Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
1
), pp.
11
21
.
5.
Cumpsty
,
N.
, and
Horlock
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Averaging Non-Uniform Flow for a Purpose
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
1
), pp.
120
129
.
6.
Spakovszky
,
Z. S.
, and
Roduner
,
C. H.
,
2009
, “
Spike and Modal Stall Inception in an Advanced Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
3
), p.
031012
.
7.
Marconcini
,
M.
,
Rubechini
,
F.
,
Arnone
,
A.
, and
Ibaraki
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Analysis of the Vaned Diffuser of a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041012
.
8.
Cukurel
,
B.
,
Lawless
,
P. B.
, and
Fleeter
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Particle Image Velocity Investigation of a High Speed Centrifugal Compressor Diffuser: Spanwise and Loading Variations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
2
), p.
021010
.
9.
Wilkosz
,
B.
,
Zimmermann
,
M.
,
Schwarz
,
P.
,
Jeschke
,
P.
, and
Smythe
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Unsteady Interaction Within a Close-Coupled Centrifugal Compressor Used in an Aero Engine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
4
), p.
041006
.
10.
Trébinjac
,
I.
,
Rochuon
,
N.
,
Kulisa
,
P.
, and
Bulot
,
N.
,
2009
, “
Effect of Unsteadiness on the Performance of a Transonic Centrifugal Compressor Stage
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
4
), p.
041011
.
11.
Baghdadi
,
S.
,
1977
, “
The Effect of Rotor Blade Wakes on Centrifugal Compressor Diffuser Performance—A Comparative Experiment
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
99
(
1
), pp.
45
52
.
12.
Cumpsty
,
N.
,
2004
,
Compressor Aerodynamics
, Reprint ed.,
Kreiger Publishing Company
,
Malabar, FL
.
13.
Casey
,
M.
, and
Rusch
,
D.
,
2014
, “
The Matching of a Vaned Diffuser With a Radial Compressor Impeller and Its Effect on the Stage Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
12
), p.
121004
.
14.
Filipenco
,
V.
,
1991
, “
Experimental Investigation of Flow Distortion Effects on the Performance of Radial Discrete-Passage Diffusers
,” Gas Turbine Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,
GTL Report No. 206
.
15.
Everitt
,
J. N.
,
2014
, “
The Role of Impeller Outflow Conditions on the Performance and Stability of Airfoil Vaned Radial Diffusers
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16.
Arts
,
T.
,
1994
, “
Measurement Techniques in Fluid Dynamics: An Introduction
,” Course Notes Prepared by Members of VKI Faculty, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genése, Belgium.
17.
Numeca International
,
2013
, “
Fine Turbo v9.0 User Manual
,” Numeca International, Brussels, Belgium.
18.
Numeca International
,
2013
, “
Fine Turbo v9.0 Theoretical Manual
,” Numeca International, Brussels, Belgium.
19.
Everitt
,
J. N.
, and
Spakovszky
,
Z. S.
,
2012
, “
An Investigation of Stall Inception in Centrifugal Compressor Vaned Diffuser
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011025
.
20.
Denton
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Some Limitations of Turbomachinery CFD
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22540.
21.
Sovran
,
G.
, and
Klomp
,
E.
,
1967
, “
Experimentally Determined Optimum Geometries for Rectilinear Diffusers With Rectangular, Conical or Annular Cross-Section
,”
Symposium on the Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flow
, Warren, MI, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NY.
22.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Graf
,
M.
,
2004
,
Internal Flow: Concepts and Applications
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
23.
Gao
,
R.
, and
Spakovszky
,
Z. S.
,
2016
, “
Area-Schedule Based Design of High Pressure Recovery Radial Diffusion Systems
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57044.
24.
Strub
,
R. A.
,
Bonciani
,
L.
,
Borer
,
C. J.
,
Casey
,
M. V.
,
Cole
,
S. L.
,
Cook
,
B. B.
,
Kotzur
,
J.
,
Simon
,
H.
, and
Strite
,
M. A.
,
1987
, “
Influence of the Reynolds Number on the Performance of Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
109
(
4
), pp.
541
544
.
25.
Anish
,
S.
,
Sitaram
,
N.
, and
Kim
,
H.
,
2014
, “
A Numerical Study of the Unsteady Interaction Effects on Diffuser Performance in a Centrifugal Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
1
), p.
011012
.
You do not currently have access to this content.