In order to achieve high aerodynamic efficiency of a turbine stage, it is crucial to identify the source of aerodynamic losses and understand the associated loss generation mechanisms. This helps a turbine designer to maximize the performance of the turbine stage. It is well known that aerodynamic losses include profile, endwall, cooling/mixing loss, leakage, and trailing edge loss components. However, it is not a trivial task to separate one from the others because different loss sources occur concurrently and they interact with each other in a machine. Consequently, designers tend to rely on various empirical correlations to get an approximate estimate of each aerodynamic loss contribution. In this study, a systematic loss audit of an uncooled turbine stage has been undertaken by conducting a series of numerical experiments. By comparing entropy growth across the turbine stage, aerodynamic losses are broken down within the stator, rotor, and interblade row gap. Furthermore, losses across each blade row are broken down into profile, leakage, endwall, and trailing edge losses. The effect of unsteady interaction due to the relative motion of the stator and the rotor was also identified. For the examined turbine stage, trailing edge losses of the rotor were dominated, contributing to more than a third of the total aerodynamic loss. The profile loss across the stator and the rotor, unsteady loss between the stator and the rotor, and the stator endwall loss were also identified to be the significant loss sources for this turbine stage. The design implications of the findings are discussed.

References

1.
Ainley
,
D. G.
, and
Mathieson
,
G. C. R.
,
1951
, “
A Method of Performance Estimation for Axial-Flow Turbines
,” A.R.C. Reports and
Memoranda No. 2974
.
2.
Benner
,
M. W.
,
Sjolander
,
S. A.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
,
2005
, “
An Empirical Prediction Method for Secondary Losses in Turbines: Part 2—A New Secondary Loss Correlation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT 2005-68639.
3.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(
4
), pp.
621
656
.
4.
Zlatinov
,
M. B.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
,
Montgomerty
,
M.
,
Islam
,
T.
, and
Harris
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Turbine Hub and Shroud Sealing Flow Loss Mechanisms
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061027
.
5.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G. P.
,
2012
, “
A Numerical Investigation into the Sources of Endwall Loss in Axial Flow Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT 2012-69173.
6.
Pullan
,
G. P.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Curtis
,
E.
,
2006
, “
Improving the Performance of a Turbine With Low Aspect Ratio Stators by Aft-Loading
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
492
499
.
7.
Newton
,
P.
,
Copeland
,
C.
,
Martinez-Botas
,
R.
, and
Seller
,
M.
,
2012
, “
An Audit of Aerodynamic Loss in a Double Entry Turbine Under Full and Partial Admission
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
33
(
1
), pp.
70
80
.
8.
Dawes
,
W. N.
,
1987
, “
Application of a Three-Dimensional Viscous Compressible Flow Solver to a High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor Rotor—Secondary Flow and Loss Generation
,” IMechE, Paper No. C261/87.
9.
Yao
,
J.
,
Cargill
,
P. L.
,
Holmes
,
D. G.
, and
Gorrell
,
S. E.
,
2010
, “
Aspects of Numerical Analysis for Unsteady Flows in Aircraft Engines
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-1603.
10.
Jameson
,
A.
,
Schmidt
,
W.
, and
Turkel
,
E.
,
1981
, “
Numerical Solution of the Euler Equations Using Finite Volume Time-Stepping Schemes
,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA Paper No. 1981-1259.
11.
Holmes
,
D. G.
,
2008
, “
Mixing Planes Revisited: A Steady State Mixing Plane Approach Designed to Combine High Levels of Conservation and Robustness
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51296.
12.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Re-Assessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
1310
.
13.
Jameson
,
A.
,
1991
, “
Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 1991-1596.
You do not currently have access to this content.