Current criteria used to determine whether rough surfaces affect skin friction typically rely on a single amplitude parameter to characterize the roughness. The most commonly used criteria relate the centerline averaged roughness, Ra, to an equivalent sandgrain roughness size, ks. This paper shows that such criteria are oversimplified and that Ra/ks is dependent on the roughness topography, namely, the roughness slope defined as the roughness amplitude normalized by the distance between roughness peaks, Ra/λ. To demonstrate the relationship, wake traverses were undertaken downstream of an aerofoil with various polished surfaces. The admissible roughness Reynolds number (ρ1u1Ra/μ1) at which the drag rose above the smooth blade case was determined. The results were used to demonstrate a 400% variation in Ra/ks over the roughness topographies tested. The relationship found held for all cases tested, except those where the roughness first initiated premature transition at the leading edge. In these cases, where the roughness was more typical of eroded aerofoils, the drag was found to rise earlier.
The Limitations of Using “Ra” to Describe Surface Roughness
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received September 26, 2015; final manuscript received October 31, 2015; published online April 26, 2016. Editor: Kenneth C. Hall.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Goodhand, M. N., Walton, K., Blunt, L., Lung, H. W., Miller, R. J., and Marsden, R. (April 26, 2016). "The Limitations of Using “Ra” to Describe Surface Roughness." ASME. J. Turbomach. October 2016; 138(10): 101003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032280
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager