The flow field in axial gas turbines is driven by strong unsteady interactions between stationary and moving components. While time-averaged measurements can highlight many important flow features, developing a deeper understanding of the complicated flows present in high-speed turbomachinery requires time-accurate measurements that capture this unsteady behavior. Toward this end, time-accurate measurements are presented for a fully cooled transonic high-pressure turbine stage operating at design-corrected conditions. The turbine is run in a short-duration blowdown facility with uniform, radial, and hot streak vane-inlet temperature profiles as well as various amounts of cooling flow. High-frequency response surface pressure and heat-flux instrumentation installed in the rotating blade row, stator vane row, and stationary outer shroud provide detailed measurements of the flow behavior for this stage. Previous papers have reported the time-averaged results from this experiment, but this paper focuses on the strong unsteady phenomena that are observed. Heat-flux measurements from double-sided heat-flux gauges (HFGs) cover three spanwise locations on the blade pressure and suction surfaces. In addition, there are two instrumented blades with the cooling holes blocked to isolate the effect of just blade cooling. The stage can be run with the vane and blade cooling flow either on or off. High-frequency pressure measurements provide a picture of the unsteady aerodynamics on the vane and blade airfoil surfaces, as well as inside the serpentine coolant supply passages of the blade. A time-accurate computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation is also run to predict the blade surface pressure and heat-flux, and comparisons between prediction and measurement are given. It is found that unsteady variations in heat-flux and pressure are stronger at low to midspan and weaker at high span, likely due to the impact of secondary flows such as the tip leakage flow. Away from the tip, it is seen that the unsteady fluctuations in pressure and heat-flux are mostly in phase with each other on the suction side, but there is some deviation on the pressure side. The flow field is ultimately shown to be highly three-dimensional, as the movement of high heat transfer regions can be traced in both the chord and spanwise directions. These measurements provide a unique picture of the unsteady flow physics of a rotating turbine, and efforts to better understand and model these time-varying flows have the potential to change the way we think about even the time-averaged flow characteristics.

References

References
1.
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2006
, “
Gas Turbine Film Cooling
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
22
(
2
), pp.
249
270
.10.2514/1.18034
2.
Bunker
,
R. S.
,
2005
, “
A Review of Shaped Hole Turbine Film-Cooling Technology
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
127
(
4
), pp.
441
453
.10.1115/1.1860562
3.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
2012
, “
Fully Cooled Single Stage HP Transonic Turbine—Part I: Influence of Cooling Mass Flow Variations and Inlet Temperature Profiles on Blade Internal and External Aerodynamics
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
3
), p.
031010
.10.1115/1.4002967
4.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
2012
, “
Fully Cooled Single Stage HP Transonic Turbine—Part II: Influence of Cooling Mass Flow Changes and Inlet Temperature Profiles on Blade and Shroud Heat-Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
3
), p.
031011
.10.1115/1.4002968
5.
Rao
,
K. V.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
1994
, “
Vane–Blade Interaction in a Transonic Turbine: Part II—Heat Transfer
,”
AIAA J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
3
), pp.
312
317
.10.2514/3.23758
6.
Allan
,
W. D.
,
Ainsworth
,
R.
, and
Thorpe
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Unsteady Heat Transfer Measurements From Transonic Turbine Blades at Engine Representative Conditions in a Transient Facility
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
130
(
4
), p.
041901
.10.1115/1.2898836
7.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Rao
,
K. V.
,
1992
, “
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage: Data/Prediction Comparison for Time-Averaged and Phase-Resolved Pressure Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
91
99
.10.1115/2928003
8.
Dring
,
R. P.
,
Blair
,
M. F.
, and
Joslyn
,
H. D.
,
1980
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Film Cooling on a Turbine Rotor Blade
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
102
(
1
), pp.
81
87
.10.1115/1.3230238
9.
Dring
,
R. P.
, and
Joslyn
,
H. D.
,
1981
, “
Measurements of Turbine Rotor Blade Flows
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
103
(
2
), pp.
400
405
.10.1115/1.3230734
10.
Dring
,
R. P.
,
Joslyn
,
H. D.
,
Hardin
,
L. W.
, and
Wagner
,
J. H.
,
1982
, “
Turbine Rotor–Stator Interaction
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
104
(
4
), pp.
729
742
.10.1115/1.3227339
11.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Seymour
,
P. J.
,
Woodward
,
S. H.
,
George
,
W. K.
, and
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
1989
, “
Phase-Resolved Heat-Flux Measurements on the Blade of a Full-Scale Rotating Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
111
(
1
), pp.
8
19
.10.1115/1.3262242
12.
Abhari
,
R. S.
, and
Epstein
,
A. H.
,
1994
, “
An Experimental Study of Film Cooling in a Rotating Transonic Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
(
1
), pp.
63
70
.10.1115/1.2928279
13.
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
Pickett
,
G. F.
, and
Ni
,
R. H.
,
1992
, “
Assessment of Unsteady Flows in Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
79
90
.10.1115/1.2928001
14.
Chana
,
K. S.
,
Singh
,
U. K.
, and
Povey
,
T.
,
2004
, “
Turbine Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Measurements and Predictions for a 1.5 Stage Configuration
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53951.10.1115/GT2004-53951
15.
Erdos
,
J. I.
,
Alzner
,
E.
, and
McNally
,
W.
,
1977
, “
Numerical Solution of Periodic Transonic Flow Through a Fan Stage
,”
AIAA J.
,
15
(
11
), pp.
1559
1568
.10.2514/3.60823
16.
He
,
L.
, and
Oldfield
,
M. L. G.
,
2011
, “
Unsteady Conjugate Heat Transfer Modeling
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
3
), p.
031022
.10.1115/1.4001245
17.
Paniagua
,
G.
,
Yasa
,
T.
,
Loma
,
A.
,
Castillon
,
L.
, and
Coton
,
T.
,
2008
, “
Unsteady Strong Shock Interactions in a Transonic Turbine: Experimental and Numerical Analysis
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
24
(
4
), pp.
722
731
.10.2514/1.34774
18.
Polanka
,
M. D.
,
Clark
,
J. P.
,
White
,
A. L.
,
Meininger
,
M.
, and
Praisner
,
T. J.
,
2003
, “
Turbine Tip and Shroud Heat Transfer and Loading: Part B—Comparisons Between Predictions and Experiment Including Unsteady Effects
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38916.10.1115/GT2003-38916
19.
Southworth
,
S. A.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Chen
,
J. P.
,
Heitland
,
G.
, and
Liu
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Time-Accurate Predictions for a Fully Cooled High-Pressure Turbine Stage—Part I: Comparison of Predictions With Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
3
), p.
031003
.10.1115/1.2985075
20.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Southworth
,
S.
,
Harral
,
J. W.
, and
Heitland
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Aerodynamic and Heat Flux Measurements in a Single Stage Fully Cooled Turbine—Part I: Experimental Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
130
(
2
), p.
021015
.10.1115/1.2750676
21.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Southworth
,
S.
,
Harral
,
J. W.
, and
Heitland
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Aerodynamic and Heat Flux Measurements in a Single Stage Fully Cooled Turbine—Part II: Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
130
(
2
), p.
021015
.10.1115/1.2750676
22.
ANSYS, 2011, “
ANSYS Reference Guide, Release 14.0
,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
23.
Weaver
,
M. M.
,
Moselle
,
J. R.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Guenette
,
G. R.
,
1994
, “
Reduction of Data From Heat-Flux Gauges—A Documentation of the MIT ACQ Code and an Adaptation to Single-Sided Gauges
,”
Calspan Report No. 7733-4
.
24.
Murphy
,
J. S.
,
2004
, “
Control of the “Heat-Island” Effect on the Measurement of Pyrex Thin-Film Button Gauges Through Gauge Design
,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
25.
Bunker
,
R. S.
,
2009
, “
The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
131
(
4
), p.
041018
.10.1115/1.3072494
You do not currently have access to this content.