Modern low pressure turbines (LPT) feature high pressure ratios and moderate Mach and Reynolds numbers, increasing the possibility of laminar boundary-layer separation on the blades. Upstream disturbances including background turbulence and incoming wakes have a profound effect on the behavior of separation bubbles and the type/location of laminar-turbulent transition and therefore need to be considered in LPT design. Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) are often found inadequate to resolve the complex wake dynamics and impact of these environmental parameters on the boundary layers and may not drive the design to the best aerodynamic efficiency. LES can partly improve the accuracy, but has difficulties in predicting boundary layer transition and capturing the delay of laminar separation with varying inlet turbulence levels. Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is able to overcome these limitations but has to date been considered too computationally expensive. Here, a novel compressible DNS code is presented and validated, promising to make DNS practical for LPT studies. Also, the sensitivity of wake loss coefficient with respect to freestream turbulence levels below 1% is discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
May 2015
Research-Article
Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part I: Methodology
Richard D. Sandberg,
Richard D. Sandberg
1
Professor
Mem. ASME
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
e-mail: R.D.Sandberg@soton.ac.uk
Mem. ASME
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
e-mail: R.D.Sandberg@soton.ac.uk
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Vittorio Michelassi,
Vittorio Michelassi
Professor
Mem. ASME
Aero-Thermal Systems,
e-mail: vittorio.michelassi@ge.com
Mem. ASME
Aero-Thermal Systems,
GE Global Research
,Munich D-85748
, Germany
e-mail: vittorio.michelassi@ge.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard Pichler,
Richard Pichler
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Liwei Chen,
Liwei Chen
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Roderick Johnstone
Roderick Johnstone
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard D. Sandberg
Professor
Mem. ASME
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
e-mail: R.D.Sandberg@soton.ac.uk
Mem. ASME
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
e-mail: R.D.Sandberg@soton.ac.uk
Vittorio Michelassi
Professor
Mem. ASME
Aero-Thermal Systems,
e-mail: vittorio.michelassi@ge.com
Mem. ASME
Aero-Thermal Systems,
GE Global Research
,Munich D-85748
, Germany
e-mail: vittorio.michelassi@ge.com
Richard Pichler
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
Liwei Chen
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
Roderick Johnstone
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
Research Group,
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment,
University of Southampton
,Southampton SO17 1BJ
, UK
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received September 10, 2014; final manuscript received September 16, 2014; published online November 26, 2014. Editor: Ronald Bunker.
J. Turbomach. May 2015, 137(5): 051011 (10 pages)
Published Online: May 1, 2015
Article history
Received:
September 10, 2014
Revision Received:
September 16, 2014
Online:
November 26, 2014
Citation
Sandberg, R. D., Michelassi, V., Pichler, R., Chen, L., and Johnstone, R. (May 1, 2015). "Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part I: Methodology." ASME. J. Turbomach. May 2015; 137(5): 051011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028731
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Guideline for Large-Scale Analysis of Centrifugal Blower Using Wall-Resolved Large Eddy Simulation
J. Turbomach (February 2025)
Related Articles
Effect of Roughness and Unsteadiness on the Performance of a New Low Pressure Turbine Blade at Low Reynolds Numbers
J. Turbomach (July,2010)
Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part II: Effect of Inflow Disturbances
J. Turbomach (July,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Design and Analysis of Centrifugal Compressors
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Introduction
Turbine Aerodynamics: Axial-Flow and Radial-Flow Turbine Design and Analysis