For efficient and accurate unsteady flow analysis of blade row interactions, a space–time gradient (STG) method has been proposed. The development is aimed at maintaining as many modeling fidelities (the interface treatment in particular) of a direct unsteady time-domain method as possible while still having a significant speed-up. The basic modeling considerations, main method ingredients and some preliminary verification have been presented in Part I of the paper. Here in Part II, further case studies are presented to examine the capability and applicability of the method. Having tested a turbine stage in Part I, here we first consider the applicability and robustness of the method for a three-dimensional (3D) transonic compressor stage under a highly loaded condition with separating boundary layers. The results of the STG solution compare well with the direct unsteady solution while showing a speed up of 25 times. The method is also used to analyze rotor–rotor/stator–stator interferences in a two-stage turbine configuration. Remarkably, for stator–stator and rotor–rotor clocking analyses, the STG method demonstrates a significant further speed-up. Also interestingly, the two-stage case studies suggest clearly measurable clocking dependence of blade surface time-mean temperatures for both stator–stator clocking and rotor–rotor clocking, though only small efficiency variations are shown. Also validated and illustrated is the capacity of the STG method to efficiently evaluate unsteady blade forcing due to the rotor–rotor clocking. Considerable efforts are directed to extending the method to more complex situations with multiple disturbances. Several techniques are adopted to decouple the disturbances in the temporal terms. The developed capabilities have been examined for turbine stage configurations with inlet temperature distortions (hot streaks), and for three blade-row turbine configurations with nonequal blade counts. The results compare well with the corresponding direct unsteady solutions.

References

References
1.
Denton
,
J. J.
,
1992
, “
The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
18
26
.
2.
He
,
L.
,
2010
, “
Fourier Method for Turbomachinery Application
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
46
(
8
), pp.
329
341
.
3.
He
,
L.
,
1992
, “
Method of Simulating Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows With Multiple Perturbations
,”
AIAA J.
,
30
(
11
), pp.
2730
27350
.
4.
Ning
,
W.
, and
He
,
L.
,
1998
, “
Computation of Unsteady Flows Around Oscillating Blades Using Linear and Non–Linear Harmonic Euler Methods
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
508
514
.
5.
Hall
,
K. C.
,
Thomas
,
J. P.
, and
Clark
,
W. S.
,
2002
, “
Computation of Unsteady Nonlinear Flows in Cascade Using a Harmonic Balance Technique
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
(
5
), pp.
879
886
.
6.
Gerolymos
,
G. A.
,
Michon
,
G. J.
, and
Neubauer
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Analysis and Application of Chorochronic Periodicity in Turbomachinery Rotor/Stator Interaction Computations
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
6
), pp.
1139
1152
.
7.
Li
,
H. D.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2005
, “
Toward Intra-Row Gap Optimization for One and Half Stage Transonic Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
127
(
3
), pp.
589
598
.
8.
Vilmin
,
S.
,
Lorrain
,
E.
,
Hirsch
,
C. H.
, and
Swoboda
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Unsteady Flow Modeling Across the Rotor/Stator Interface Using the Nonlinear Harmonic Method
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90210.
9.
Ekici
,
K.
, and
Hall
,
K. C.
,
2007
, “
Nonlinear Analysis of Unsteady Flows in Multistage Turbomachines Using Harmonic Balance
,”
AIAA J.
,
45
(
5
), pp.
1047
1057
.
10.
Sicot
,
F.
,
Dufour
,
G.
, and
Gourdain
,
N.
,
2011
, “
A Time-Domain Harmonic Balance Method for Rotor/Stator Interactions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
1
), p.
011001
.
11.
Frey
,
C.
,
Ashcroft
,
G.
,
Kersken
,
H.-P.
, and
Volgt
,
C.
,
2014
, “
A Harmonic Balance Technique for Multistage Turbomachinery Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25230.
12.
Yi
,
J.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Space-Time Gradient Method for Unsteady Bladerow Interaction—Part I: Basic Methodology and Verification
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
137
(
11
), p.
111008
.
13.
Dorney
,
D. J.
, and
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
1997
, “
Evaluation of Flow Field Approximations for Transonic Compressor Stages
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
(
3
), pp.
445
451
.
14.
Höhn
,
W.
,
Gombert
,
R.
, and
Kraus
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamical Blade Row Interaction in a New Multistage Research Turbine: Part 2—Numerical Investigation
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-0307.
15.
Billiard
,
N.
,
Fidalgo
,
V. J.
,
Dénos
,
R.
, and
Paniagua
,
G.
,
2007
, “
Analysis of Stator-Stator Clocking in a Transonic Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27323.
16.
Billiard
,
N.
,
Paniagua
,
G.
, and
Dénos
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Impact of Clocking on the Aero-Thermodynamics of a Second Stator Tested in a One and a Half Stage HP Turbine
,”
J. Therm. Sci.
,
17
(
2
), pp.
97
110
.
17.
He
,
L.
,
Chen
,
T.
,
Wells
,
R. G.
,
Li
,
Y. S.
, and
Ning
,
W.
,
2002
, “
Analysis of Rotor-Rotor and Stator-Stator Interferences in Multi-Stage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
4
), pp.
564
571
.
18.
Reid
,
L.
, and
Moore
,
R. D.
,
1978
, “
Design and Overall Performance of Four Highly Loaded, High-Speed Inlet Stages for an Advanced High-Pressure-Ratio Core Compressor
,”
NASA
Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. NASA-TP-1337.
19.
He
,
L.
,
Menshikova
,
V.
, and
Haller
,
B. R.
,
2007
, “
Effect of Hot-Streak Counts on Turbine Blade Heat Load and Forcing
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
23
(
6
), pp.
1235
1241
.
You do not currently have access to this content.