Experimental, numerical and analytical methods were used to investigate the effects of the blade trailing edge thickness on the profile loss of ultrahigh-lift low-pressure turbine blades. Two cascades, the T106C and the T2, were studied. The loss obtained based on the data at the blade trailing edge plane and the plane 0.3 Chord downstream of the trailing edge agree with each other for T106C blade with and without upstream wakes at different Reynolds numbers. The blade profile losses were broken down as the suction surface boundary loss, the pressure side boundary loss and the mixing loss downstream of the trailing edge for six Reynolds numbers. Trailing edge thicknesses varying from 1.4% to 4.7% pitch were investigated at a Reynolds number of 210,000. It was found that the flow distributions across the passage at the trailing edge planes were highly nonuniform. In particular, and as a result, the trailing edge base pressure was higher than the mixed-out static pressure, so the contribution of the base pressure to the mixing loss downstream of the trailing edge plane was to reduce the loss. When the trailing edge thickness increases, there are three main effects: (1) the area with high base pressure region increases, which tends to reduce the downstream mixing loss; (2) the base pressure reduces, which tends to increase the loss; and (3) the flow diffusion downstream of the trailing edge, which tends to increase the loss. The overall result is the combined effect. For the T106C cascade, increasing the trailing edge thickness from 1.9% pitch to 2.8% pitch has a small effect on the loss. Further increasing the trailing edge thickness increases the loss. The T2 blade has a higher lift than the T106C blade, so the effects of the base pressure in reducing the mixing loss downstream of the trailing edge is more evident. The experimental results show that the profile loss first decreases and then increases as the trailing edge thickness increases. CFD, using the transition k-ω SST model and the k-ω SST model, provides good predictions of the aerodynamic performance. It was used to study the cases with trailing edge thicknesses of 1.4% pitch and 2.9% pitch. The profile loss is almost the same for these two trailing edge thickness. The results show that it is possible to use thicker blade trailing edges in low pressure turbines without aerodynamic penalty. This can lead to benefits in terms of mechanical integrity and manufacturing cost reductions.

References

References
1.
Zhang
,
X. F.
, and
Hodson
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Effects of Reynolds Number and Freestream Turbulence Intensity on the Unsteady Boundary Layer Development on an Ultra-High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(1), p.
011016
.10.1115/1.3106031
2.
Stieger
,
R. D.
, and
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
2004
, “
The Transition Mechanism of Highly Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(4), pp.
536
543
.10.1115/1.1773850
3.
Hodson
,
H.
, and
Howell
,
R.
,
2005
, “
Bladerow Interactions, Transition, and High-Lift Aerofoils in Low Pressure Turbines
,”
Ann. Rev.
,
37
, pp.
71
98
.10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175511
4.
Xu.
,
L.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1988
, “
The Base Pressure and Loss of a Family of Four Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
110
(1), pp.
9
17
.10.1115/1.3262174
5.
Zhou
C.
,
Chang
,
H.
,
Cui
,
D.
, and
Mao
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Cooling Flow Downstream of a Turbine Guide Vane Trailing Edge Slot
,”
J. Aerosp. Power
,
21
(2), pp.
268
274
.
6.
Roberts
,
Q.
,
1997
, “
The Trailing Edge Loss of Subsonic Turbine Blades
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
7.
Curtis
,
E. M.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
,
Banieghbal
,
M. R.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
,
Howell
,
R. J.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
,
1997
, “
Development of Blade Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbine Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
(3), pp.
531
539
.10.1115/1.2841154
8.
Denton
,
J.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(4), pp.
621
657
.10.1115/1.2929299
9.
Hart
,
M.
,
Hall
,
D. M.
, and
Singh
,
G.
,
1991
, “
Computational Methods for the Aerodynamic Development of Large Steam Turbines
,” IMechE Paper No. C432/009.
10.
Coull
, J., and
Hodson
, H.,
2012
, “
Predicting the Profile Loss of High-Lift Low Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(2), p.
021002
.10.1115/1.4002961
11.
Prust
, H. W., Jr.
, and
Helon
,
R. M.
,
1972
, “
Effect of Trailing-Edge Geometry and Thickness on the Performance of Certain Turbine Stator Blading
,” NASA Paper No. TN D-6637.
12.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
, and
Graf
,
M. B.
,
2005
,
Internal Flow Concepts and Applications
,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, UK
.
13.
Schlichting
,
H.
,
1979
,
Boundary-Layer Theory
,
7th ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
14.
Mahallati
,
A.
, and
Sjolander
,
S. A.
,
2007
, “
Aerodynamics of a Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers. Part 2: Blade-Wake Interactions
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27348.10.1115/GT2007-27348
15.
Arts
,
T.
, and
Houtermans
,
R.
,
2005
, “
High Speed T2 Cascade Tests at VKI
,” Unsteady Transitional Flows in Axial Turbomachines (UTAT) Project Report No. R-D2.3.9-P11/05.
16.
Zhang
,
X.
,
2005
, “
Separation and Transition Control on Ultra-High-Lift Low Pressure Turbine Blades in Unsteady Flow
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
You do not currently have access to this content.