The feasibility of a drag management device that reduces engine thrust on approach by generating a swirling outflow from the fan (bypass) nozzle is assessed. Deployment of such “engine air-brakes” (EABs) can assist in achieving slower and/or steeper and/or aeroacoustically cleaner approach profiles. The current study extends previous work from a ram air-driven nacelle (a so-called “swirl tube”) to a “pumped” or “fan-driven” configuration and also includes an assessment of a pylon modification to assist a row of vanes in generating a swirling outflow in a more realistic engine environment. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and aeroacoustic measurements in an anechoic nozzle test facility are performed to assess the swirl-flow-drag-noise relationship for EAB designs integrated into two NASA high-bypass ratio (HBPR), dual-stream nozzles. Aerodynamic designs have been generated at two levels of complexity: (1) a periodically spaced row of swirl vanes in the fan flowpath (the “simple” case), and (2) an asymmetric row of swirl vanes in conjunction with a deflected trailing edge pylon in a more realistic engine geometry (the “installed” case). CFD predictions and experimental measurements reveal that swirl angle, drag, and jet noise increase monotonically but approach noise simulations suggest that an optimal EAB deployment may be found by carefully trading any jet noise penalty with a trajectory or aerodynamic configuration change to reduce perceived noise on the ground. Constant speed, steep approach flyover noise predictions for a single-aisle, twin-engine tube-and-wing aircraft suggest a maximum reduction of 3 dB of peak tone-corrected perceived noise level (PNLT) and up to 1.8 dB effective perceived noise level (EPNL). Approximately 1 dB less maximum benefit on each metric is predicted for a next-generation hybrid wing/body aircraft in a similar scenario.

References

References
1.
Manneville
,
A.
, Pilczer, D., and Spakovszky, Z. S.,
2006
, “
Preliminary Evaluation of Noise Reduction Approaches for a Functionally Silent Aircraft
,”
AIAA J. Aircraft
,
43
(
3
), pp.
836
840
.
2.
Lockard
,
D. P.
, and
Lilley
,
G. M.
,
2004
, “
The Airframe Noise Reduction Challenge
,” NASA Ref. Pub. 213013,
Hampton, VA
.
3.
Clarke
,
J. B.
, Ho, N. T., Ren, L., Brown, J. A., Elmer, K. R., Zou, K., Hunting, C., McGregor, D. L., Shivashankara, B. N., Tong, K.-O., Warren, A. W., and Wat, J. K.,
2004
, “
Continuous Descent Approach: Design and Flight Test for Louisville International Airport
,”
AIAA J. Aircraft
,
41
(5), pp.
1054
1066
.
4.
Reynolds.
T. R.
, Ren, L., Clarke, J.-P., Burke, A., and Green, M.,
2005
, “
History, Development, and Analysis of Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures for UK Airports
,”
AIAA 5th Aviation, Technology, Integration and Operations Conference
,
Arlington, VA
,
September 26–28
,
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-7395.10.2514/6.2005-7395
5.
Lutz
,
T.
, and
Wieser
,
T.
,
2005
, “
Heading for the City: A318 Steep Approach Development
,”
International Federation of Airline Pilots' Associations
, I.F.A.L.P.A. News
.
6.
Weed
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Hybrid Wing-Body Aircraft Noise and Performance Assessment
,” M.S. thesis,
MIT
,
Cambridge, MA
.
7.
Shah
,
P. N.
, Mobed, D., and Spakovszky, Z.,
2007
, “
Engine Air-Brakes for Quiet Air Transport
,”
45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
, January 8–11,
AIAA
Paper No. 2007-1033.10.2514/6.2007-1033
8.
Shah
,
P. N.
,
2010
, “
A Novel Turbomachinery Air-Brake Concept for Quiet Aircraft
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041002
.10.1115/1.3192145
9.
Shah
,
P. N.
, Mobed, D., Spakovszky, Z. S., Brooks, T. F., and Humphreys, W. M.,
2010
, “
Aeroacoustics of Drag Generating Swirling Exhaust Flows
,”
AIAA J.
,
48
(
4
), pp.
719
737
.10.2514/1.37249
10.
Brooks
,
T.
, and
Humphreys
,
W.
, Jr.
,
2006
, “
A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined From Phased Microphone Arrays
,”
ASME J. Sound Vib.
,
294
(
4–5
), pp.
856
879
.10.1016/j.jsv.2005.12.046
11.
Tanna
,
H. K.
,
1973
, “
On the Effect of Swirling Motion of Sources on Subsonic Jet Noise
,”
J. Sound Vib
,
29
(
3
), pp.
281
293
.10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80285-8
12.
Lu
,
H.
,
Ramsay
,
J.
, and
Miller
,
D.
,
1977
, “
Noise of Swirling Exhaust Jets
,”
AIAA J.
,
15
(
5
), pp.
642
646
.10.2514/3.60673
13.
Schwartz
,
I.
,
1973
, “
Jet Noise Suppression by Swirling in the Jet Flow
,”
AIAA Aero-Acoustics Conference
,
Seattle, WA
, October 15–17,
AIAA
Paper No. 1973-1003.10.2514/6.1973-1003
14.
Janardan
,
B. A.
, Hoff, G. E., Barter, J. W., Martens, S., Gliebe, P. R., Mengle, V., and Dalton, W. N., 2000, “
AST Critical Propulsion and Noise Reduction Technologies for Future Commercial Subsonic Engines: Separate-Flow Exhaust System Noise Reduction Concept Evaluation; Final Report
,” NASA CR 2000-210039.
15.
Soeder
,
R. H.
, Wnuk, S., and Loew, R., 2006, “
Nozzle Acoustic Test Rig User Manual
,” NASA/TM-2006-212939.
16.
Debonis
,
J. R.
,
2008
, “
RANS Analyses of Turbofan Nozzles With Wedge Deflectors for Noise Reduction
,”
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV, January 7–10,
AIAA
Paper No. 2008-41.10.2514/6.2008-41
17.
Dougherty
,
R.
, and
Podboy
,
G.
,
2009
, “
Improved Phased Array Imaging of a Model Jet
,”
15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (30th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference)
,
Miami, FL
,
May 11–13
,
AIAA
Paper No. 2009-3186.10.2514/6.2009-3186
18.
Hughes
,
C. E.
, Jeracki, R., Woodward, R., and Miller, C.,
2002
, “
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Rotor Alone Aerodynamic Performance Results
,”
8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference
,
Breckenridge, CO
,
June 17–19
,
AIAA
Paper No. 2002-2426.10.2514/6.2002-2426
19.
Munk
,
M.
, and
Prim
,
R.
,
1947
, “
On the Multiplicity of Steady Gas Flows Having the Same Streamline Patterns
,”
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
,
33
, pp.
137
141
.10.1073/pnas.33.5.137
20.
Greitzer
,
E. M.
, Tan, C. S., and Graf, M. B.,
2004
,
Internal Flow-Concepts and Applications
,
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.