While it is well understood that certain nondimensional parameters, such as freestream Reynolds number and turbulence intensity, must be matched for proper design of film cooling experiments; uncertainty continues on the ideal method to scale film cooling flow rate. This debate typically surrounds the influence of the coolant to freestream density ratio (DR) and whether mass flux ratio or momentum flux ratio properly accounts for the density effects. Unfortunately, density is not the only fluid property to differ between typical wind tunnel experiments and actual turbine conditions. Temperature differences account for the majority of the property differences; however, attempts to match DR through the use of alternative gases can exacerbate these property differences. A computational study was conducted to determine the influence of other fluid properties besides density, namely, specific heat, thermal conductivity, and dynamic viscosity. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed by altering traditional film cooling nondimensional parameters as well as others such as the Reynolds number ratio, Prandtl number ratio, and heat capacity ratio (HCR) to evaluate their effects on adiabatic effectiveness and heat transfer coefficient. A cylindrical leading edge with a flat afterbody was used to simulate a turbine blade leading edge region. A single coolant hole was located 21.5 deg from the leading edge, angled 20 deg to the surface and 90 deg from the streamwise direction. Results indicated that thermal properties can play a significant role in understanding and matching results in cooling performance. Density effects certainly dominate; however, variations in conductivity and heat capacity can result in 10% or higher changes in the resulting heat flux to the surface when scaling ambient rig configurations to engine representative conditions.

References

References
1.
Pietrzyk
,
J. R.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Crawford
,
M. E.
,
1990
, “
Effects of Density Ratio on the Hydrodynamics of Film Cooling
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
(
3
), pp.
437
443
.10.1115/1.2927678
2.
Sinha
,
A. K.
,
Bogard
,
D. G.
, and
Crawford
,
M. E.
,
1991
, “
Film Cooling Downstream of a Single Row of Holes With Variable Density Ratio
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
(
3
), pp.
442
449
.10.1115/1.2927894
3.
Ammari
,
H. D.
,
Hay
,
N.
, and
Lampard
,
D.
,
1990
, “
The Effect of Density Ratio on the Heat Transfer From a Film-Cooled Flat Plate
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
(
3
), pp.
444
450
.10.1115/1.2927679
4.
Eberly
,
M. K.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2013
, “
Time-Resolved Film-Cooling Flows at High and Low Density Ratios
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
136
(
6
), p.
061003
.10.1115/1.4025574
5.
Ekkad
,
S. V.
,
Han
,
J. C.
, and
Du
,
H.
,
1998
, “
Detailed Film Cooling Measurements on a Cylindrical Leading Edge Model: Effect of Free-Stream Turbulence and Coolant Density
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
4
), pp.
799
807
.10.1115/1.2841792
6.
Beirnaert-Chartrel
,
G.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
2012
, “
CFD Predictions of Heat Transfer Coefficient Augmentation on a Simulated Film Cooled Turbine Blade Leading Edge
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-70015.10.1115/GT2012-70015
7.
Ekkad
,
S. V.
,
Ou
,
S.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
,
2004
, “
A Transient Infrared Thermography Method for Simultaneous Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient Measurements from a Single Test
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
4
), pp.
597
603
.10.1115/1.1791283
8.
Rutledge
,
J. L.
,
King
,
P. I.
, and
Rivir
,
R. B.
,
2012
, “
Influence of Film Cooling Unsteadiness on Turbine Blade Leading Edge Heat Flux
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
7
), p.
071901
.10.1115/1.4005978
9.
Rutledge
,
J. L.
,
King
,
P. I.
, and
Rivir
,
R.
,
2008
, “
CFD Predictions of Pulsed Film Cooling Heat Flux on a Turbine Blade Leading Edge
,”
ASME
Paper No. IMECE2008-67276.10.1115/IMECE2008-67276
10.
Leylek
,
J. H.
, and
Zerkle
,
R. D.
,
1994
, “
Discrete-Jet Film Cooling: A Comparison of Computational Results With Experiments
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
(
3
), pp.
358
368
.10.1115/1.2929422
11.
Pointwise
,
2006
, Gridgen User's Guide, Version 15, Pointwise, Inc., Fort Worth, TX.
12.
Marcum
,
D. L.
,
1998
, “
Advancing-Front/Local-Reconnection (AFLR) Unstructured Grid Generation
,”
Computational Fluid Dynamics Review 1998
, Vol.
2
,
Hafez
,
M. M.
, and
Ōshima
,
K.
, eds.,
World Scientific
,
Singapore
, pp.
140
157
.
13.
ANSYS
,
2009
, FLUENT 12.0 User's Guide, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
14.
Harrison
,
K.
, and
Bogard
,
D.
,
2007
, “
CFD Predictions of Film Cooling Adiabatic Effectiveness for Cylindrical Holes Embedded in Narrow and Wide Transverse Trenches
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-2800510.1115/GT2007-28005.
15.
Coulthard
,
S. M.
,
Volino
,
R. J.
, and
Flack
,
K. A.
,
2006
, “
Effect of Unheated Starting Lengths on Film Cooling Experiments
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
579
588
.10.1115/1.2184355
16.
Kays
,
W. M.
, and
Crawford
,
M. E.
,
1980
,
Convective Heat and Mass Transfer
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
17.
Han
,
J. C.
,
Dutta
,
S.
, and
Ekkad
,
S. V.
,
2000
,
Gas Turbine Heat Transfer and Cooling Technology
,
Taylor & Francis
,
New York
.
18.
Baldauf
,
S.
,
Scheurlen
,
M.
,
Schulz
,
A.
, and
Wittig
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Correlation of Film-Cooling Effectiveness From Thermographic Measurements at Enginelike Conditions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
(
4
), pp.
686
698
.10.1115/1.1504443
19.
Sen
,
B.
,
Schmidt
,
D. L.
, and
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
1996
, “
Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
(
4
), pp.
800
806
.10.1115/1.2840937
You do not currently have access to this content.