The detailed mechanisms of purge flow interaction with the hot-gas flow path were investigated using both unsteady computationally fluid dynamics (CFD) and measurements for a turbine operating at design corrected conditions. This turbine consisted of a single-stage high-pressure turbine and the downstream, low-pressure turbine nozzle row with an aerodynamic design equivalent to actual engine hardware and typical of a commercial, high-pressure ratio, transonic turbine. The high-pressure vane airfoils and inner and outer end walls incorporated state-of-the-art film cooling, and purge flow was introduced into the cavity located between the high-pressure vane and disk. The flow field above and below the blade angel wing was characterized by both temperature and pressure measurements. Predictions of the time-dependent flow field were obtained using a three-dimensional, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes CFD code and a computational model incorporating the three blade rows and the purge flow cavity. The predictions were performed to evaluate the accuracy obtained by a design style application of the code, and no adjustment of boundary conditions was made to better match the experimental data. Part I of this paper compared the predictions to the measurements in and around the purge flow cavity and demonstrated good correlation. Part II of this paper concentrates on the analytical results, looking at the primary gas path ingestion mechanism into the cavity as well as the effects of the rotor purge on the upstream vane and downstream rotor aerodynamics and thermodynamics. Ingestion into the cavity is driven by high static pressure regions downstream of the vane, high-velocity flow coming off the pressure side of the vane, and the blade bow waves. The introduction of the purge flow is seen to have an effect on the static pressure of the vane trailing edge in the lower 5% of span. In addition, the purge flow is weak enough that upon exiting the cavity, it is swept into the mainstream flow and provides no additional cooling benefits on the platform of the rotating blade.

References

References
1.
Bayley
,
F. J.
, and
Owen
,
J. M.
,
1970
, “
The Fluid Dynamics of Shrouded Disk System With a Radial Outflow of Coolant
,”
AMSE J Eng. Power
,
92
, pp.
335
341
.10.1115/1.3445358
2.
Abe
,
T.
,
Kikuchi
,
J.
, and
Takeuchi
,
H.
,
1979
, “
An Investigation of Turbine Disk Cooling (Experimental Investigation and Observation of Hot Gas Flow Into a Wheel Space)
,”
13th CIMAC Congress
,
Vienna
, May 7–10, Paper No. GT-30.
3.
Phadke
,
U. P.
, and
Owen
,
J. M.
,
1988
, “
Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems: Part 1: The Behavior of Simple Shrouded Rotating Disk Systems in Quiescent Environment
,”
Int. J Heat Fluid Flow
,
9
,
pp 98
105
.10.1016/0142-727X(88)90060-4
4.
Phadke
,
U. P.
, and
Owen
,
J. M.
,
1988
, “
Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems: Part 2: The Behavior of Simple Seals in a Quasi-Axisymmetric External Flow
,”
Int. J Heat Fluid Flow
,
9
, pp
106
112
.10.1016/0142-727X(88)90061-6
5.
Phadke
,
U. P.
, and
Owen
,
J. M.
,
1988
, “
Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems: Part 3: The Effect of Non-Axisymmetric External Flow on Seal Performance
,”
Int. J Heat Fluid Flow
,
9
, pp
113
117
.10.1016/0142-727X(88)90062-8
6.
Mirzamoghadam
,
A. V.
,
Heitland
,
G.
,
Morris
,
M. C.
,
Smokte
,
J.
,
Malak
,
M.
, and
Howe
,
J.
2008
, “
3D CFD Ingestion Evaluation of a High Pressure Turbine Rim Seal Disk Cavity
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Berlin, Germany, June 9–13,
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50531.10.1115/GT2008-50531
7.
Mirzamoghadam
,
A. V.
,
Heitland
,
G.
, and
Hosseini
,
K. M.
,
2009
, “
The Effect of Annulus Performance Parameters on Rotor-Stator Cavity Sealing Flow
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Orlando, FL, June 8–12,
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59380.10.1115/GT2009-59380
8.
Cao
,
C.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
,
Millington
,
P. R.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
,
2003
, “
Interaction of Rim Seal and Annulus Flows in an Axial Flow Turbine
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Atlanta, GA, June 16–19,
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38368.10.1115/GT2003-38368
9.
Zhou
,
D. W.
,
Roy
,
R. P.
,
Wnag
,
C.-Z.
, and
Glahn
,
J. A.
,
2009
, “
Main Gas Ingestion in a Turbine Stage for Three Rim Cavity Configurations
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Orlando, FL, June 8–12,
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59851.10.1115/GT2009-59851
10.
Jackoby
,
R.
,
Zierer
,
R. J.
,
DeVito
,
L.
,
Lindblad
,
K.
,
Larsson
,
J.
,
Bohn
,
D.
,
Funcke
,
J.
, and
Decker
,
A.
,
2004
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Flow Field in an Axial Gas Turbine Rim Seal Configuration
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17,
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53829.10.1115/GT2004-53829
11.
Bohn
,
D.
, and
Wolff
,
M.
,
2003
, “
Improved Formulation to Determine Minimum Sealing Flow—CW,min—for Different Sealing Configurations
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Atlanta, GA, June 16–19,
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38465.10.1115/GT2003-38465
12.
Julien
,
S.
,
Lefrancois
,
J.
,
Dumas
,
G.
,
Boutet-Blais
,
G.
,
Lapointe
,
S.
,
Caron
,
J.
, and
Marini
,
R.
,
2010
, “
Simulations of Flow Ingestion and Related Structures in a Turbine Disk Cavity
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Glasgow, Scotland, June 14–18,
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22729.10.1115/GT2010-22729
13.
Guo
,
Z.
, and
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
1999
, “
Predicted Combined Effects of Purge Flow and Rotor-Casing Eccentricity on Ingress Heat
,”
ASME J. Propul. Power
,
15
(
3
), pp.
454
461
.10.2514/2.5448
14.
Okita
,
Y.
,
Nishiura
,
M.
,
Yamawaki
,
S.
, and
Hironaka
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
A Novel Cooling Method for Turbine Rotor-Stator Rim Cavities Affected by Mainstream Ingress
,”
ASME J. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
(4), pp.
798
806
.10.1115/1.1925647
15.
Girgis
,
S.
,
Vlasic
,
E.
,
Lavole
,
J. P.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
,
2002
, “
The Effect of Secondary Air Injection on the Performance of a Transonic Turbine Stage
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Amsterdam, June 3–6,
ASME
Paper No. GT2002-30340.10.1115/GT2002-30340
16.
Ried
,
K.
,
Denton
,
J.
,
Graham
,
P.
,
Curtis
,
E.
, and
Longley
,
J.
,
2006
, “
The Effect of Stator-Rotor Hub Sealing Flow on the Mainstream Aerodynamics of a Turbine
,” ASME Turbo Expo, Barcelona, Spain, May 8–11,
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90838.10.1115/GT2006-90838
17.
Paniagua
,
G.
,
Denos
,
R.
, and
Almeida
,
S.
,
2004
, “
Effect of the Hub Endwall Cavity Flow on the Flow-Filed of a Transonic High-Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(4), pp.
578
586
.10.1115/1.1791644
18.
Pau
,
M.
,
Paniagua
,
G.
,
Delhaye
,
D.
, and
de la Loma
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Aerothermal Impact of Stator-Rim Purge Flow and Rotor-Platform Film Cooling on a Transonic Turbine Stage
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(2), p.
021006
.10.1115/1.3142859
19.
Pau
,
M.
, and
Paniagua
,
G.
,
2010
, “
Investigation of the Flow Field on a Transonic Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane With Rim Seal Cavity Flow Ejection
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
132
(11), p.
111101
.10.1115/1.4002887
20.
FINE/Turbo User's Manual
,
2007
, “
User Manual: FINE/Turbo v8 (Including Euranus) Flow Integrated Environment
,” NUMECA International, Brussels, Belgium.
21.
Chen
,
T.
,
Vasanthakumar
,
P.
, and
He
,
L.
,
2001
, “
Analysis of Unsteady Blade Row Interaction Using Nonlinear Harmonic Approach
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
17
(
3
), pp.
651
658
.10.2514/2.5792
22.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
,
1992
, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 92–439.10.2514/6.1992-439
23.
Mathison
,
R. M.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
2010
, “
Heat Transfer for the Blade of a Cooled One and One-Half Stage High-Pressure Turbine—Part II: Influence of Purge Cooling Variation
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
(
3
), p.
031015
.10.1115/1.4003174
24.
Kahveci
,
H. S.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
2013
, “
Heat Transfer for the Film-Cooled Vane of a 1-1/2 Stage High-Pressure Transonic Turbine—Part I: Experimental Configuration and Data Review With Inlet Temperature Profile Effects
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(2), p.
021027
.10.1115/1.4006775
25.
Kahveci
,
H. S.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Mathison
,
R. M.
, and
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
2013
, “
Heat Transfer for the Film-Cooled Vane of a 1-1/2 Stage High-Pressure Transonic Turbine—Part II: Effect of Cooling Variation on Vane Airfoil and Inner Endwall
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
135
(2), p.
021028
.10.1115/1.4006776
You do not currently have access to this content.