A computational method for performing aeroelastic analysis using either a time-linearized or an unsteady time-accurate solver for the compressible Reynolds averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations is described. The time-linearized solver employs the assumption of small time-harmonic perturbations and is implemented via finite differences of the nonlinear flux routines of the time-accurate solver. The resulting linear system is solved using a parallelized generalized minimal residual (GMRES) method with block-local preconditioning. The time accurate solver uses a dual time stepping algorithm for the solution of the unsteady RANS equations on a periodically moving computational grid. For either solver, and both flutter and forced response problems, a mapping algorithm has been developed to map structural eigenmodes, obtained from finite element structural analysis, from the surface mesh of the finite element structural solver to the surface mesh of the finite volume flow solver. Using the surface displacement data an elliptic mesh deformation algorithm, based on linear elasticity theory, is then used to compute the grid deformation vector field. The developed methods are validated first using standard configuration 10. Finally, for an ultra-high bypass ratio fan, the results of the time-linearized and the unsteady module are compared. The gain in prediction time using the linearized methods is highlighted.

References

References
1.
Clark
,
W. S.
. and
Hall
,
K. C.
, 2000, “
A Time-Linearized Navier-Stokes Analysis of Stall Flutter
,”
J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
3
), pp.
467
476
.
2.
Sbardella
,
L.
, and
Imregun
,
M.
, 2001, “
Linearized Unsteady Viscous Turbomachinery Flows Using Hybrid Grids
,”
J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
3
), pp.
568
582
.
3.
Poli
,
F.
,
Gambini
,
E.
,
Arnone
,
A.
, and
Schipani
,
C.
, 2006, “
A 3D Time-Linearized Method for Turbomachinery Blade Flutter Analysis
,”
11th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT)
, September 4–8, Moscow, Russia.
4.
Repar
,
P.
2006, “
Development of an Efficient and Robust Linearised Navier-Stokes Flow Solver
,”
Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines
,
K. C.
Hall
,
R. E.
Kielb
, and
J. P.
Thomas
, eds.,
Springer
,
Amsterdam
, pp.
437
448
.
5.
Nürnberger
,
D.
,
Eulitz
,
F.
,
Schmitt
,
S.
, and
Zachcial
,
A.
, 2001, “
Recent Progress in the Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Viscous Multistage Turbomachinery Flow
,” 15th International Symposioum on Air Breathing Engines, ISABE Paper No. 2001–1081, September 2–7, Bangalore, India.
6.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 2004,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
,
DCW Industries Inc.
,
La Cañada, CA
.
7.
van Leer
,
B.
, 1997, “
Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme. V. A Second-Order Sequel to Godunov’s Method
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
135
(
2
), pp.
229
248
.
8.
Roe
,
P. L.
, 1981, “
Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
43
(
2
), pp.
357
372
.
9.
Blazek
,
J.
, 2001,
Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications
.
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
.
10.
Schmitt
,
S.
, 2003, “
Simulation of Flutter and Forced Response in Turbomachinery Blade Rows
,” Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Propulsion Technology, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.
11.
Nürnberger
,
D.
,
Eulitz
,
F.
, and
Schmitt
,
S.
, 2001, “
Time Accurate Simulation of Turbomachinery Flow Using an Implicit Time Integration Scheme
”. AIAA Paper No. 2001–0082.
12.
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1990, “
Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Calculations
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
(
12
), pp.
2050
2058
.
13.
Schnell
,
R.
, 2004, “
Investigation of the Tonal Acoustic Field of a Transonic Fanstage by Time-Domain CFD-Calculations With Arbitrary Blade Counts
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-54216.
14.
Clark
,
W. S.
, and
Hall
,
K.
, 1995, “
A Numerical Model of Onset of Stall Flutter in Cascades
,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-337.
15.
Saad
,
Y.
, 2003,
Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems
,
2nd ed.
SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
,
Philadelphia
.
16.
Adams
,
L.
, 1985, “
m-Step Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Methods
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
452
463
.
17.
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Mavripilis
,
D. J.
, 2005, “
Unstructured Dynamic Meshes With Higher-Order Time Integration Schemes for the Unstready Navier-Stokes Equations
,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-1222.
18.
Kielb
,
R.
,
Barter
,
J.
,
Chernysheva
,
O.
, and
Fransson
,
T.
, 2006, “
Flutter Design of Low Pressure Turbine Blades With Cyclic Symmetric Modes
,”
Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines
,
K. C.
Hall
,
R. E.
Kielb
, and
J. P.
Thomas
, eds.,
Springer
,
Amsterdam
, pp.
41
52
.
19.
Fransson
,
T. H.
, and
Verdon
,
J. M.
, 1992, “
Updated Report on Standard Configurations for the Determination of Unsteady Flow Through Vibrating Axial-Flow Turbomachine-Cascades
,” KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, Technical Report No. TRITA/KRV/92.009.
20.
Kaplan
,
B.
,
Nicke
,
E.
, and
Voss
,
C.
, 2006, “
Design of a Highly Efficient Low-Noise Fan for Ultra-High Bypass Engines
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90363.
You do not currently have access to this content.