This paper examines experimentally the effects of an upstream cavity on the flow structures and secondary losses in a transonic linear turbine cascade. The cavity approximates the endwall geometry resulting from the platform overlap at the interface between stationary and rotating turbine blade rows. Previous investigations of the effects of upstream cavity geometries have been conducted mainly at low-speed conditions. The present work aims to extend such research into the transonic regime with a more engine representative upstream platform geometry. The investigations were carried out in a blow-down type wind tunnel. The cavity is located at 30 % of axial chord from the leading edge, extends 17 % of axial-chord in depth, and is followed by a smooth ramp to return the endwall to its nominal height. Two cascades are examined for the same blade geometry: the baseline cascade with a flat endwall and the cascade with the cavity endwall. Measurements were made at the design incidence and the outlet design Mach number of 0.80. At this condition, the Reynolds number based on outlet velocity is about 600,000. Off-design outlet Mach numbers of 0.69, and 0.89 were also investigated. Flowfield measurements were carried out at 40 % axial-chord downstream of the trailing edge, using a seven-hole pressure probe, to quantify losses and identify the flow structures. Additionally, surface flow visualization using an ultra-violet reactive dye was employed at the design Mach number, on the endwall and blade surfaces, to help in the interpretation of the flow physics. The experimental results also include blade-loading distributions, and the probe measurements were processed to obtain total-pressure loss coefficients, and streamwise vorticity distributions. It was found that the presence of the upstream cavity noticeably altered the structure and the strength of the secondary flow. Some effect on the secondary losses was also evident, with the cavity having a larger effect at the higher Mach number.

References

References
1.
Rolls-Royce
, 1986, “
The Jet Engine
,”
Rolls-Royce PLC
,
Derby
,
England, UK
.
2.
Hunter
,
S.
, and
Manwaring
,
S.
, 2002, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gas Path Aerodynamics in Axial Flow Turbine
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, 2000, Paper No. 2000-GT-651.
3.
Anker
,
J.
, and
Mayer
,
J.
, 2002, “
Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in Axial Turbine
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002, Paper No.GT2002-30348.
4.
Paniagua
,
G.
,
Denos
,
R.
, and
Almeida
,
S.
, 2004, “
Effect of the Hub Endwall Cavity Flow on the Flow Field of Transonic High-Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
, pp.
578
586
.
5.
de la Rosa Blanco
,
E.
, and
Hodson
,
H.
, 2005, “
Effect of Upstream Platform Geometry on the Endwall Flows of a Turbine Cascade
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Paper No. GT2005-68938.
6.
Marini
,
R.
, and
Girgis
,
S.
, 2007, “
The Effect of Blade Leading Edge Platform Shape on Upstream Disk Cavity to Mainstream Flow Interaction of a High-Pressure Turbine Stage
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007, Paper No. GT2007-27429.
7.
Islam
,
A. M. T.
, 1999, “
An Experimental and Computational Study of the Aerodynamics of Turbine Blades with Damage
,” Ph. D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
8.
Jeffries
,
M.
, 2000, “
Initial Investigation of Transonic Turbine Aerodynamics using the Carleton University High-Speed Wind Tunnel
,” Ph. D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
9.
Jouini
,
D. B. M.
, 2000, “
Experimental Investigation of Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions
,” Ph. D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
10.
Corriveau
,
D.
, 2005, “
Influence of Loading Distribution on the Performance of High Pressure Turbine Blades
,” Ph. D. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.
11.
Zoríc
,
T.
,
Popovíc
,
I.
,
Sjolander
,
S.
,
Praisner
,
T.
, and
Grover
,
E.
, 2007, “
Comparative Investigation of Three Highly Loaded LP Turbine Airfoils: Part I - Measured Profile and Secondary Losses at Design Incidence
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007, Paper No. GT2007-27537.
12.
Zoríc
,
T.
,
Popovíc
,
I.
,
Sjolander
,
S.
,
Praisner
,
T.
, and
Grover
,
E.
, 2007, “
Comparative Investigation of Three Highly Loaded LP Turbine Airfoils: Part II - Measured Profile and Secondary Losses at Off-Design Incidence
,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2007, Paper No. GT2007-27538.
13.
Hodson
,
H.
, and
Dominy
,
R.
, 1987, “
The Off-Design Performance of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
109
, pp.
201
209
.
14.
Weiss
,
A.
, and
Fottner
,
L.
, 1995, “
The Influence of Load Distribution on Secondary Flow in Straight Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
133
141
.
15.
Perdichizzi
,
A.
, 1990, “
Mach Number Effects on Secondary Flow Development Downstream of a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
, pp.
642
651
.
16.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1985, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
248
257
.
17.
Wang
,
H.
,
Olson
,
S.
,
Goldstein
,
R. J.
, and
Eckert
,
E.
, 1997, “
Flow Visualization in Linear Turbine Cascade of High Performance Turbine Blades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
1
8
.
18.
Sharma
,
O.
, and
Butler
,
T.
, 1987, “
Predictions of Endwall Losses and Secondary Flows in Axial Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
109
, pp.
229
236
.
19.
Sieverding
,
C.
, and
Bosche
,
P. V. D.
, 1983, “
Use of Coloured Smoke to Visualize Secondary Flows in a Turbine Blade Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
134
, pp.
85
89
.
You do not currently have access to this content.