This paper presents a study of the effects of two types of hub coolant injection on the rotor of a high pressure gas turbine stage. The first involves the leakage flow from the hub cavity into the mainstream. The second involves a deliberate injection of coolant from a row of angled holes from the edge of the stator hub. The aim of this study is to improve the distribution of the injected coolant on the rotor hub wall. To achieve this, it is necessary to understand how the coolant and leakage flows interact with the rotor secondary flows. The first part of the paper shows that the hub leakage flow is entrained into the rotor hub secondary flow and the negative incidence of the leakage strengthens the secondary flow and increases its penetration depth. Three-dimensional unsteady calculations were found to agree with fast response pressure probe measurements at the rotor exit of a low speed test turbine. The second part of the paper shows that increasing the injected coolant swirl angle reduced the secondary flow penetration depth, improves the coolant distribution on the rotor hub, and improves stage efficiency. Most of the coolant however, was still found to be entrained into the rotor secondary flow.

References

References
1.
Aoki
,
S.
, 2000, “
Trend and Key Technologies for Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Power Generation in a Globally Competitive Market and Environmental Regulations
,”
International Joint Power Generation Conference
, Miami Beach, Florida, IJPGC Paper No. 2000–15084.
2.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1985, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in a Turbine Blade Cascade
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
248
257
.
3.
Gregory-Smith
,
D.G.
, 1997, “
Secondary and Tip-Clearance Flows in Axial Turbines
,” VKI LS 1997–01, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode St. Genese, Belgium.
4.
Langston
,
L. S.
, 2001, “
Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review
,”
Ann. New York Acad. Sci.
,
934
, pp.
11
26
.
5.
Sharma
,
O. P.
, and
Butler
,
T. L.
, 1987, “
Prediction of Endwall Losses and Secondary Flows in Axial Flow Turbine Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach
,
109
, pp
229
236
.
6.
Walsh
,
J. A.
, and
Gregory-Smith
D. G.
, 1989, “
Inlet Skew and the Growth of Secondary Losses and Vorticity in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
, pp.
633
642
.
7.
Hunter
,
S. D.
, and
Manwaring.
S. R.
, 2000, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gas Path Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part I-Experimental and Numerical Investigation
,”
ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-651
.
8.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Brouillet
,
B.
, and
De Vito
,
L.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and the Main Flow in a Three Stage LP Turbine
,”
ASME Paper No. 2003-GT-38025
.
9.
Paniagua
,
G.
,
Denos
,
R.
, and
Almeida
,
S.
, 2004, “
Effect of the Hub Endwall Cavity Flow on the Flow-Field of a Transonic High-Pressure Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
, pp.
578
586
.
10.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
, 1999, “
The Influence of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Compressor Performance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach
,
121
, pp
486
498
.
11.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
Tolchinsky
,
I.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
, 2000, “
Modelling Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows in Axial-flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp
55
61
.
12.
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
, 2000, “
The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors
,”
ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-570
.
13.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, 2001, “
Details of Axial Compressor Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows
,”
ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0495
.
14.
McLean
,
C.
,
Camci
,
C.
, and
Glezer
,
B.
, 2001, “
Mainstream Aerodynamic Effects Due to Wheelspace Coolant Injection in a High-Pressure Turbine Stage: Part I—Aerodynamic Measurements in the Stationary Frame
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
123
(
4
), pp.
687
696
.
15.
Girgis
,
S.
,
Vlasic
,
E.
,
Lavoie
,
J.-P.
, and
Moustapha
,
S. H.
, 2002, “
The Effect of Secondary Air Injection on the Performance of a Transonic Turbine Stage
,”
ASME Paper No. GT-2002–30340
.
16.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1992, “
The Calculation of Three Dimensional Viscous Flow through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
18
26
.
17.
Pullan
,
G.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
, 2003. “
Numerical Simulations of Vortex-Turbine Blade Interaction
,”
5th European Turbomachinery Conference
, Prague, Czech Republic, pp.
1049
1059
.
18.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 2002, “
The Effects of Lean and Sweep on Transonic Fan Performance
,” TASK Q., Jan, pp.
7
23
.
19.
Miller
,
R. J.
,
Moss
,
R. W.
,
Ainsworth
,
R. W.
, and
Horwood
C. K.
, 2003, “
Time Resolved Vane Rotor Interaction in a High Pressure Turbine Stage
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
125
(
1
), pp.
1
13
.
20.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Horlock
,
J. H.
, 2006, “
Defining the Efficiency of a Cooled Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
, pp.
658
667
.
21.
Young
,
J. B.
, and
Wilcock
,
R. C.
, 2002, “
Modeling the Air Cooled Gas Turbine: Part 2—Coolant Flows and Losses
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
, pp.
214
222
.
22.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1999, “
State of the Art and Future of Turbine Technology
,”
Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress
,
Kobe, Japan
, Paper No. KS-4.
You do not currently have access to this content.