The turbomachinery industry continually struggles with the adverse effects of contact rubs between airfoils and casings. The key parameter controlling the severity of a given rub event is the contact load produced when the airfoil tips incur into the casing. These highly nonlinear and transient forces are difficult to calculate and their effects on the static and rotating components are not well understood. To help provide this insight, experimental and analytical capabilities have been established and exercised through an alliance between GE Aviation and The Ohio State University Gas Turbine Laboratory. One of the early findings of the program is the influence of blade flexibility on the physics of rub events. The focus of this paper is to quantify the influence of airfoil flexibility through a novel modeling approach that is based on the relationship between the applied force duration and maximum tip deflection. Results from the model are compared with experimental results, providing sound verification.

1.
Padova
,
C.
,
Barton
,
J.
,
Dunn
,
M.
, and
Manwaring
,
S.
, 2007, “
Experimental Results From Controlled Blade Tip/Shroud Rubs at Engine Speed
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
129
, pp.
713
723
.
2.
Padova
,
C.
,
Barton
,
J.
,
Dunn
,
M.
,
Manwaring
,
S.
,
Young
,
G.
,
Adams
,
M.
, and
Adams
,
M.
, 2005, “
Development of an Experimental Capability to Produce Controlled Blade Tip/Shroud Rubs at Engine Speed
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
127
, pp.
726
735
.
3.
Padova
,
C.
,
Barton
,
J.
,
Dunn
,
M.
,
Turner
,
K.
,
DiTommaso
,
D.
, and
Turner
,
A.
, 2008, “
Casing Treatment and Blade Tip Configuration Effects on Controlled Gas Turbine Blade Tip/Shroud Rubs at Engine Conditions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X, accepted for publication.
4.
Sawicki
,
J. T.
,
Padovan
,
J.
, and
Al-Khatib
,
R.
, 1999, “
The Dynamics of Rotor With Rubbing
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
1023-621X,
5
, pp.
295
304
.
5.
Muszynska
,
A.
, 1989, “
Rotor-to-Stationary Element Rub-Related Vibration Phenomena in Rotating Machinery—Literature Survey
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
0583-1024,
21
, pp.
3
11
.
6.
Ahrens
,
J.
,
Ulbrich
,
H.
, and
Ahaus
,
G.
, 2000, “
Measurement of Contact Forces During Blade Rubbing
,” IMechE, pp. 259–263.
7.
Young
,
G.
, 2006, “
Development of a General Predictive Model for Blade Tip/Shroud Interference; Interactive Forces
,” MS thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
8.
Ferguson
,
J.
, 2008, “
A Moving Load Finite Element-Based Approach to Determining Blade Tip Forces During a Blade-on-Casing Incursion in a Gas Turbine Engine
,” MS thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
9.
Jiang
,
J.
,
Ahrens
,
J.
,
Ulbrich
,
H.
, and
Scheideler
,
E.
, 1998, “
A Contact Model of a Rotating Rubbing Blade
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Rotor Dynamics
, pp.
478
489
.
10.
Garza
,
J.
, 2006, “
Tip Rub Induced Blade Vibrations: Experimental and Computational Results
,” MS thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
11.
Turner
,
K.
, 2005, “
Development of a Numerical Model for Predicting Tip Rub-Induced Dynamics of an Axial Flow Compressor Blade
,” MS thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
12.
Sinha
,
S. K.
, 2005, “
Non-Linear Dynamic Response of a Rotating Radial Timoshenko Beam With Periodic Pulse Loading at the Free End
,”
Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.
0020-7462,
40
, pp.
113
149
.
13.
Meirovitch
,
L.
, 2001,
Fundamentals of Vibration
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.