This paper presents the application of an adjoint method to the aerodynamic design optimization of a turbine blade. With the adjoint method, the complete gradient information needed for optimization can be obtained by solving the governing flow equations and their corresponding adjoint equations only once, regardless of the number of design parameters. The formulations including imposition of appropriate boundary conditions for the adjoint equations of the Euler equations for turbomachinery problems are presented. Two design cases are demonstrated for a turbine cascade that involves a high tip flare, characteristic of steam turbine blading in low-pressure turbines. The results demonstrate that the design optimization method is effective and the redesigned blade yields weaker shock and compression waves in the supersonic region of the flow while satisfying the specified constraint. The relative effects of changing blade profile stagger, modifying the blade profile shape, and changing both stagger and profile shape at the same time are examined and compared. Navier–Stokes calculations are performed to confirm the performance at both the design and off-design conditions of the blade designed by the Euler method.

1.
Jameson
,
A.
, 2003, “
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method
,”
Lectures at the von Karman Institute
.
2.
Samad
,
A.
, and
Kim
,
K. Y.
, 2008, “
Multiple Surrogate Modeling for Axial Compressor Blade Shape Optimization
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
24
(
2
), pp.
301
310
.
3.
Jang
,
C. M.
,
Li
,
P.
, and
Kim
,
K. Y.
, 2005, “
Optimization of Blade Sweep in a Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor
,”
JSME Int. J.
0913-185X,
48
(
4
), pp.
793
801
.
4.
Hager
,
J. O.
,
Eyi
,
S.
, and
Lee
,
K. D.
, 1993, “
Design Efficiency Evaluation for Transonic Airfoil Optimization: A Case for Navier-Stokes Design
,” AIAA Paper No. 93-3112.
5.
Jameson
,
A.
, 1988, “
Aerodynamic Design Via Control Theory
,”
J. Sci. Comput.
0885-7474,
3
(
3
), pp.
233
260
.
6.
Jameson
,
A.
, 1995, “
Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using CFD and Control Theory
,” AIAA Paper No. 95-1729.
7.
Kim
,
S.
,
Alonso
,
J. J.
, and
Jameson
,
A.
, 2004, “
Multi-Element High-Lift Configuration Design Optimization Using Viscous Continuous Adjoint Method
,”
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
41
(
5
), pp.
1082
1097
.
8.
Dreyer
,
J. J.
, and
Martinelli
,
L.
, 2001, “
Hydrodynamic Shape Optimization of Propulsor Configurations Using a Continuous Adjoint Approach
,” AIAA Paper No. 2001-2580.
9.
Yang
,
S.
,
Wu
,
H.
, and
Liu
,
F.
, 2003, “
Aerodynamic Design of Cascades by Using an Adjoint Equation Method
,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-1068.
10.
Wu
,
H.
,
Yang
,
S.
, and
Liu
,
F.
, 2003, “
Comparison of Three Geometric Representations of Airfoils for Aerodynamic Optimization
,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-4095.
11.
Wu
,
H.
, and
Liu
,
F.
, 2005, “
Aerodynamic Design of Turbine Blades Using an Adjoint Equation Method
,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-1006.
12.
Wu
,
H.
, 2005, “
Aerodynamic Optimization of Internal and External Flows Using the Adjoint-Equation Method
,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
13.
Papadimitriou
,
D. I.
, and
Giannakoglou
,
K. C.
, 2006, “
A Continuous Adjoint Method for the Minimization of Losses in Cascade Viscous Flows
,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-49.
14.
Wang
,
D.
, and
He
,
L.
, 2010, “
Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multi-Stage Turbomachines: Part I—Methodology and Verification
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X
132
, p.
021011
.
15.
Wang
,
D.
,
He
,
L.
,
Wells
,
R.
, and
Chen
,
T.
, 2010, “
Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multi-Stage Turbomachines: Part II—Validation and Application
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X
132
, p.
021012
.
16.
Havakechian
,
S.
, and
Greim
,
R.
, 1999, “
Aerodynamic Design of 50 Percent Reaction Steam Turbines
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
213
(
1
), pp.
1
25
.
You do not currently have access to this content.