A letterbox trailing edge configuration is formed by adding flow partitions to a gill slot or pressure side cutback. Letterbox partitions are a common trailing edge configuration for vanes and blades, and the aerodynamics of these configurations are consequently of interest. Exit surveys detailing total pressure loss, turning angle, and secondary velocities have been acquired for a vane with letterbox partitions in a large-scale low speed cascade facility. These measurements are compared with exit surveys of both the base (solid) and gill slot vane configurations. Exit surveys have been taken over a four to one range in chord Reynolds numbers (500,000, 1,000,000, and 2,000,000) based on exit conditions and for low (0.7%), grid (8.5%), and aerocombustor (13.5%) turbulence conditions with varying blowing rate (50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% design flow). Exit loss, angle, and secondary velocity measurements were acquired in the facility using a five-hole cone probe at a measuring station representing an axial chord spacing of 0.25 from the vane trailing edge plane. Differences between losses with the base vane, gill slot vane, and letterbox vane for a given turbulence condition and Reynolds number are compared providing evidence of coolant ejection losses, and losses due to the separation off the exit slot lip and partitions. Additionally, differences in the level of losses, distribution of losses, and secondary flow vectors are presented for the different turbulence conditions at the different Reynolds numbers. The letterbox configuration has been found to have slightly reduced losses at a given flow rate compared with the gill slot. However, the letterbox requires an increased pressure drop for the same ejection flow. The present paper together with a related paper (2008, “Letterbox Trailing Edge Heat Transfer—Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness,” ASME, Paper No. GT2008-50474), which documents letterbox heat transfer, is intended to provide designers with aerodynamic loss and heat transfer information needed for design evaluation and comparison with competing trailing edge designs.

1.
Fiala
,
N. J.
,
Johnson
,
J. D.
, and
Ames
,
F. E.
, 2008, “
Letterbox Trailing Edge Heat Transfer—Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-50474.
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
3.
1972,
Turbine Design and Application
, Vols.
1–3
,
A. G.
Glassman
, ed., Washington, DC, NASA SP-290.
4.
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
, and
Cleak
,
J. G. E.
, 1992, “
Secondary Flow Measurements in a Turbine Cascade With High Inlet Turbulence
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
173
183
.
5.
Ames
,
F. E.
, and
Plesniak
,
M. W.
, 1997, “
The Influence of Large Scale, High Intensity Turbulence on Vane Aerodynamic Losses, Wake Growth, and Exit Turbulence Parameters
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
182
192
.
6.
Ames
,
F. E.
, 1994, “
The Influence of High Intensity, Large Scale Turbulence on Turbine Vane Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics
,”
NASA
Report No. CR 4633.
7.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1985, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flow in Turbine Blade Passages
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
107
, pp.
248
257
.
8.
Klein
,
A.
, 1966, “
Investigation of the Entry Boundary Layer on the Secondary Flows in the Blading of Axial Turbines
, BHRA Report No. T 1004.
9.
Langston
,
L. S.
,
Nice
,
M. L.
, and
Hooper
,
R. M.
, 1977, “
Three-Dimensional Flow Within a Turbine Cascade Passage
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
99
, pp.
21
28
.
10.
Marchal
,
P.
, and
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1977, “
Secondary Flows Within Turbomachinery Bladings
,”
Secondary Flows in Turbomachines
, AGARD Paper No. CP 214.
11.
Praisner
,
T. J.
, and
Smith
,
C. R.
, 2005, “
The Dynamics of the Horseshoe Vortex and Associated Endwall Heat Transfer, Part I—Temporal Behavior
,”
ASME
, Paper No. GT2005-69088.
12.
Burd
,
S. W.
, and
Simon
,
T. W.
, 2000, “
Flow Measurements in a Nozzle Guide Vane Passage With a Low Aspect Ratio and Endwall Contouring
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
659
666
.
13.
Zess
,
G. A.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
, 2001, “
Computational Design and Experimental Evaluation of Using an Inlet Fillet on a Gas Turbine Vane
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2001-GT-404.
14.
Ingram
,
G.
,
Gregory-Smith
,
D.
,
Rose
,
M.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
Brennan
,
G.
, 2002, “
The Effect of End-Wall Profiling on Secondary Flow and Low Development in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2002-30339.
15.
Kapteijn
,
C.
,
Amecke
,
J.
, and
Michelassi
,
V.
,1994, “
Aerodynamic Performance of a Transonic Turbine Guide Vane With Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection: Part I—Experimental Approach
,”
ASME
Paper No. 94-GT-288.
16.
Osnaghi
,
C.
,
Perdichizzi
,
A.
,
Savini
,
M.
,
Harasgama
,
P.
, and
Lutum
,
E.
, 1997, “
The Influence of Film Cooling on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane
,”
ASME
Paper No. 97-GT-522.
17.
Pappu
,
K. R.
, and
Schobeiri
,
M. T.
, 1997, “
Optimization of Trailing Edge Ejection Mixing Losses: A Theoretical and Experimental Study
,”
ASME
Paper No. 97-GT-523.
18.
Deckers
,
M.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1997, “
The Aerodynamics of Trailing-Edge-Cooled Transonic Turbine Blades: Part 1—Experimental Approach
,”
ASME
Paper No. 97-GT-518.
19.
Uzol
,
O.
, and
Camci
,
C.
, 2001, “
Aerodynamic Loss Characteristics of a Turbine Blade With Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection: Part 2—External Aerodynamics, Total Pressure Losses, and Predictions
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
249
257
.
20.
Telisinghe
,
J. C.
,
Ireland
,
P. T.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
,
Barrett
,
D.
, and
Son
,
C.
, 2006, “
Comparative Study Between a Cut-Back and Conventional Trailing Edge Film Cooling System
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-91207.
21.
Brundage
,
A. L.
,
Zucrow
,
M. J.
,
Plesniak
,
M. W.
,
Lawless
,
P. B.
, and
Ramadhyani
,
S.
, 2007, “
Experimental Investigation of Airfoil Trailing Edge Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Losses
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
0894-1777,
31
(
3
), pp.
249
260
.
22.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Johnson
,
J. D.
, and
Fiala
,
N. J.
, 2006, “
The Influence of Aero-Derivative Combustor Turbulence and Reynolds Number on Vane Aerodynamic Losses, Secondary Flows, and Wake Growth
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT-2006-90168.
23.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Johnson
,
J. D.
, and
Fiala
,
N. J.
, 2007, “
Gill Slot Trailing Edge Heat Transfer—Effects of Blowing Rate, Reynolds Number, and External Turbulence on Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27397.
24.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Barbot
,
P. A.
, and
Wang
,
C.
, 2003, “
Effects of Aeroderivative Combustor Turbulence on Endwall Heat Transfer Distributions Acquired in a Linear Vane Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
125
, pp.
210
220
.
25.
2001, FLUENT 6.0 User’s Guide, Fluent, Inc., Lebanon, NH.
26.
White
,
F. M.
, 1991,
Viscous Fluid Flow
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
27.
Moffat
,
R. J.
, 1988, “
Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
0894-1777,
1
, pp.
3
17
.
28.
Ames
,
F. E.
,
Hylton
,
L. D.
, and
York
,
R. E.
, 1986, Unpublished work on the impact of the inlet endwall boundary layer on secondary losses and velocity vectors in a compressible turbine cascade, Allison Gas Turbine Division of General Motors.
You do not currently have access to this content.