Sweep, when the stacking axis of the blade is not perpendicular to the axisymmetric stream surface in the meridional view, is often an unavoidable feature of turbine design. In a previously reported study, the authors demonstrated that sweep leads to an inevitable increase in midspan profile loss. In this paper, the influence on the flowfield close to the endwalls is investigated. Experimental data from two linear cascades, one unswept, and the other swept at 45 deg but having the same overall turning and midspan pressure distribution, are presented. It is shown that sweep causes the blade to become more rear loaded at the hub and fore loaded at the casing. This is further shown to reduce the penetration of the secondary flow at the hub, and to produce a highly unusual secondary flow structure, with low endwall overturning, at the casing. A computational study is then presented in which the development of the secondary flows of both blades is studied. The differences in the endwall flowfields are found to be caused by a combination of the effect of sweep on both the endwall blade loading distribution and on the bulk movements of the primary irrotational flow.

1.
Smith
,
L. H.
, and
Yeh
,
H.
, 1963, “
Sweep and Dihedral Effects in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
85
, pp.
401
416
.
2.
Potts
,
I.
, 1987, “
The Importance of S-1 Stream Surface Twist in the Analysis of Invisvid Flow Through Swept Linear Turbine Cascades
,”
IMechE
,
C258/87
pp.
231
248
.
3.
Denton
,
J.
, and
Xu
,
L.
, 1999, “
The Exploitation of 3D Flow in Turbomachinery Design
,”
IMechE
,
213
, pp.
125
137
.
4.
Pullan
,
G.
, and
Harvey
,
N. W.
, 2006, “
The Influence of Sweep on Axial Flow Turbine Aerodyanmics at Mid-Span
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-91070.
5.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
, 1985, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
107
, pp.
248
257
.
6.
Langston
,
L.
, 2001, “
Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review
,”
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.
0077-8923,
934
, pp.
11
26
.
7.
Curtis
,
E.
,
Hodson
,
H.
,
Banieghbal
,
M.
,
Denton
,
J.
,
Howell
,
R.
, and
Harvey
,
N.
, 1997, “
Development of Blade Profiles for Low Pressure Turbine Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
531
538
.
8.
Howell
,
R.
,
Ramesh
,
O.
,
Hodson
,
H.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
Schulte
,
V.
, 2001, “
High Lift and Aft-Loaded Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
181
188
.
9.
Harvey
,
N.
,
Cox
,
J.
,
Schulte
,
V.
,
Howell
,
R.
, and
Hodson
,
H.
, 1999, “
The Role of Research in the Aerodynamic Design of an Advanced Low-Pressure Turbine
,”
IMechE
,
C557∕043
, pp.
123
132
.
10.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
, 2006, “
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modelling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
699
707
.
11.
Pullan
,
G.
,
Denton
,
J.
, and
Curtis
,
E.
, 2006, “
Improving the Performance of a Turbine With Low Aspect Ratio Stators by Aft-Loading
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
128
, pp.
492
499
.
12.
Gregory-Smith
,
D.
,
Graves
,
C.
, and
Walsh
,
J.
, 1988, “
Growth of Secondary Losses and Vorticity in an Annular Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
110
, pp.
1
8
.
13.
Yaras
,
M.
, and
Sjolander
,
S.
, 1990, “
Development of the Tip-Leakage Flow Downstream of a Planar Cascade of Turbine Blades: Vorticity Field
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
112
, pp.
609
617
.
14.
Langston
,
L.
,
Nice
,
M.
, and
Hooper
,
R.
, 1977, “
Three-Dimensional Flow Within a Turbine Cascade Passage
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
0022-0825,
99
, pp.
21
28
.
15.
Wallis
,
A.
, and
Denton
,
J.
, 1988, “
Comparison of Design Intent and Experimental Measurements in a Low Aspect Ratio Axial Flow Turbine with Three-Dimensional Blading
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-516.
You do not currently have access to this content.