Imperfections in the turbine annulus geometry, caused by the presence of the shroud and associated cavity, have a significant influence on the aerodynamics of the main passage flow path. In this paper, the datum shroud geometry, representative of steam turbine industrial practice, was systematically varied and numerically tested. The study was carried out using a three-dimensional multiblock solver, which modeled the flow in a 1.5 stage turbine. The following geometry parameters were varied: inlet and exit cavity length, shroud overhang upstream of the rotor leading edge and downstream of the trailing edge, shroud thickness for fixed casing geometry and shroud cavity depth, and shroud cavity depth for the fixed shroud thickness. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the above geometric modifications on mainstream aerodynamics and to obtain a map of the possible turbine efficiency changes caused by different shroud geometries. The paper then focuses on the influence of different leakage flow fractions on the mainstream aerodynamics. This work highlighted the main mechanisms through which leakage flow affects the mainstream flow and how the two interact for different geometrical variations and leakage flow mass fractions.

1.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Johnson
,
C. G.
, 1972, “
The Tip Leakage Loss of Turbine Blades—A Review and a Theory for Shrouded Blades
,” Marchwood Engineering Laboratories, CEGB Report No. R/M/N627.
2.
Traupel
,
W.
, 1970, “
Erbenisse von Turbinenversuchen
,”
Flow Research on Blading
,
Elsevier
,
New York
.
3.
Hubert
,
G.
, 1963, “
Untersuchungen ueber die Sekundarverluste in Axialem Turbomaschinen
,” VDI Forschungsheft.
4.
Wallis
,
A. M.
, 1997, “
Secondary and Leakage Flows in a Multistage Turbine
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
5.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
,
Sell
,
M.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 2001, “
Flow Interaction From the Exit Cavity of an Axial Turbine Blade Row Labyrinth Seal
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
342
352
.
6.
Rushton
,
G. J.
, 2003, “
High-Pressure Turbine Shroud Leakage
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
7.
Giboni
,
A.
,
Menter.
,
J. R.
,
Peters
,
P.
,
Wolter
,
K.
,
Pfost
,
H.
, and
Breisig
,
V.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38722.
8.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-435.
9.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Brouillet
,
B.
, and
de Vito
,
L.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Shroud Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38025.
10.
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
, 2006, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Loss by Reducing Circumferential Mixing
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90946.
11.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1990, “
The Calculation of Three Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines
,” ASME Paper No. 90-GT-19.
12.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
, 2005, “
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modelling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68459.
13.
Rosic
,
B.
, 2006, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows in Low Aspect Ratio Multistage Turbines
,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
14.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Effects of Labyrinth Seal Variation on Multistage Axial Turbine Flow
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38270.
You do not currently have access to this content.