Sweep, when the stacking axis of the blade is not perpendicular to the axisymmetric streamsurface in the meridional view, is often an unavoidable feature of turbine design. Although a high aspect ratio swept blade can be designed to achieve the same pressure distribution as an unswept design, this paper shows that the swept blade will inevitably have a higher profile loss. A modified Zweifel loading parameter, taking sweep into account, is first derived. If this loading coefficient is held constant, it is shown that sweep reduces the required pitch-to-chord ratio and thus increases the wetted area of the blades. Assuming fully turbulent boundary layers and a constant dissipation coefficient, the effect of sweep on profile loss is then estimated. A combination of increased blade area and a raised pressure surface velocity means that the profile loss rises with increasing sweep. The theory is then validated using experimental results from two linear cascade tests of highly loaded blade profiles of the type found in low-pressure aeroengine turbines: one cascade is unswept, the other has $45deg$ of sweep. The swept cascade is designed to perform the same duty with the same loading coefficient and pressure distribution as the unswept case. The measurements show that the simple method used to estimate the change in profile loss due to sweep is sufficiently accurate to be a useful aid in turbine design.

1.
Smith
,
L. H.
, and
Yeh
,
H.
, 1963, “
Sweep and Dihedral Effects in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
85
, pp.
401
416
.
2.
Potts
,
I.
, 1987, “
The Importance of S-1 Stream Surface Twist in the Analysis of Invisvid Flow Through Swept Linear Turbine Cascades
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: Mech. Eng. Sci.
0263-7154,
258
(
87
), pp.
231
248
.
3.
Hill
,
J.
, and
Lewis
,
R.
, 1974, “
Experimental Investigations of Strongly Swept Turbine Cacades
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
16
, pp.
32
40
.
4.
Bräunling
,
W.
, and
Lehthaus
,
F.
, 1986, “
Investigations of the Effect of Annulus Taper on Transonic Turbine Cascade Flow
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
108
, pp.
285
292
.
5.
Denton
,
J.
, 1992, “
The Calculation of Three Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
(
1
), pp.
18
26
.
6.
Denton
,
J.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
7.
Curtis
,
E.
,
Hodson
,
H.
,
Banieghbal
,
M.
,
Denton
,
J.
,
Howell
,
R.
, and
Harvey
,
N.
, 1997, “
Development of Blade Profiles for Low Pressure Turbine Applications
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
531
538
.
8.
Howell
,
R.
,
Ramesh
,
O.
,
Hodson
,
H.
,
Harvey
,
N.
, and
Schulte
,
V.
, 2001, “
High Lift and Aft-Loaded Profiles for Low-Pressure Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
181
188
.
9.
Harvey
,
N.
,
Cox
,
J.
,
Schulte
,
V.
,
Howell
,
R.
, and
Hodson
,
H.
, 1999, “
The Role of Research in the Aerodynamic Design of an Advanced Low-Pressure Turbine
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: Mech. Eng. Sci.
0263-7154,
557
(
43
), pp.
123
132
.