This paper presents the outcome of a recent study in clocking-related flow features and multistage effects occurring in high-pressure turbine blade geometries. The current investigation deals with an experimentally based systematic analysis of the effects of both stator-stator and rotor-rotor clocking. Due to the low aspect ratio of the turbine geometry, the flow field is strongly three-dimensional and is dominated by secondary flow structures. The investigation aims to identify the flow interactions involved and the associated effects on performance improvement or degradation. Consequently a three-dimensional numerical analysis has been undertaken to provide the numerical background to the test case considered. The experimental studies were performed in a two-stage axial research turbine facility. The turbine provides a realistic multi-stage environment, in which both stator blade rows and the two rotors can be clocked relative to each other. All blade rows have the same blade number count, which tends to amplify clocking effects. Unsteady and steady measurements were obtained in the second stage using fast response aerodynamic probes and miniature pneumatic five-hole probes. The current comprehensive investigation has shown that multistage and unsteady flow effects of stator and rotor clocking in low aspect ratio turbines are combined in a nonlinear fashion caused by axial and radial redistribution of low energy fluid. The integral result of clocking on stage efficiency is compensated by competing loss generating mechanisms across the span.

1.
Jouini
,
D. B. M.
,
Little
,
D.
,
Bancalari
,
E.
,
Dunn
,
M.
,
Haldeman
,
C.
, and
Johnson
,
P. D.
, 2003, “
Experimental Investigation of Airfoil Wake Clocking Impacts on Aerodynamic Performance in a Two Stage Turbine Test Rig
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003–38872.
2.
Huber
,
F. W.
,
Johnson
,
P. D.
,
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
Staubach
,
J. B.
, and
Gaddis
,
S. W.
, 1996, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoiles: Part 1—Experimental Investigation
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
630
635
.
3.
Reinmöller
,
U.
,
Stephan
,
B.
,
Schmidt
,
S.
, and
Niehuis
,
R.
, 2002, “
Clocking Effects in a 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine—Steady and Unsteady Experimental Investigations Supported by Numerical Simulations
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
124
, pp.
52
60
.
4.
Gombert
,
R.
, and
Höhn
,
W.
, 2001, “
Unsteady Aero-dynamical Blade Row Interactions in a New Multistage Research Turbine—Part I: Experimental Investigation
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0306.
5.
Walraevens
,
R. E.
,
Gallus
,
H. E.
,
Jung
,
A. R.
,
Mayer
,
J. F.
, and
Stetter
,
H.
, 1998, “
Experimental and Computational Study of the Unsteady Flow in a 1.5 Stage Axial Turbine with Emphasis on the Secondary Flow in the Second Stator
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-254.
6.
Tiedemann
,
M.
, and
Kost
,
F.
, 2001, “
Some Aspects of Wake-Wake Interactions Regarding Turbine Stator Clocking
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
123
, pp.
526
533
.
7.
Höhn
,
W.
, and
Heinig
,
K.
, 2000, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Unsteady Flow Interaction in a Low-Pressure Multistage Turbine
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
628
633
.
8.
Griffin
,
L. W.
,
Huber
,
F. W.
, and
Sharma
,
O. P.
, 1996, “
Performance Improvement Through Indexing of Turbine Airfoiles: Part II—Numerical Simulation
,”
J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
118
, pp.
636
642
.
9.
Dorney
,
D. J.
, and
Sharma
,
O. P.
, 1996, “
A Study of Turbine Performance Increase Through Airfoil Clocking
,” AIAA Paper No. 96–2816.
10.
Dorney
,
D. J.
, and
Sondak
,
D. L.
, 1996, “
Three-Dimensional Simulation of Airfoil Clocking in a 1–1/2 Stage Turbine
,” AIAA Paper No. 96–2816.
11.
Sell
,
M.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Treiber
,
M.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2001, “
The 2-stage Axial Turbine Test Facility LISA
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0492.
12.
Hourmouziadis
,
J.
, 1989, “
Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines
,” Lecture 8, AGARD LS-167.
13.
Treiber
,
M.
,
Kupferschmied
,
P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 1998, “
Analysis of the Error Propagation Arising from the Measurements with a Miniature Pneumatic 5-hole Probe
,” XIVth Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines, Limerck.
14.
Kupferschmied
,
P.
,
Köppel
,
O.
,
Gizzi
,
W. P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 2000, “
Time Resolved Flow Measurements with Fast Aerodynamic Probes in Turbomachinery
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
0957-0233,
11
, pp.
1036
1054
.
15.
Pfau
,
A.
,
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2002, “
Virtual Four Sensor Fast Response Aerodynamic Probe (FRAP)
,”
Proceedings of the XVIth Bi-Annual Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines
,
Cambridge
, UK, September 23–24.
16.
Dawes
,
W. N.
, BT0B3D, 1991, “
A Computer Program for the Analysis of Three-Dimensional Viscous Compressible Flow in Tubomachinery Blade Rows
,” Manual for BT0B3D.
17.
Jameson
,
A.
, and
Baker
,
T. J.
, 1984, “
Multigrid Solutions of the Euler Equations for Aircraft Configurations
,” AIAA Paper No. 84–0093.
18.
Emunds
,
R.
,
Jennions
,
I. K.
,
Bohn
,
D.
, and
Gier
,
J.
, 1997, “
The Computation of Adjacent Blade-Row Effects in a 1.5 Stage Axial Flow Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-81.
19.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
, 1992, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,” AIAA Report 92–0439.
20.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
21.
Saxer
,
A. P.
, and
Giles
,
M. B.
, 1993, “
Quasi-Three-Dimensional Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equations Calculations
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
9
(
2
), pp.
263
271
.
22.
Haldeman
,
C.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
J., Barter
,
J. W.
,
Green
,
B. R.
, and
Bergholz
,
R. F.
, 2004, “
Experimental Investigation of Vane Clocking in a One and 1∕2 Stage High Pressure Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004–53477.
23.
Pfau
,
A.
, 2003, “
Loss Mechanisms in Labyrinth Seals of Shrouded Axial Turbines
.” ETH Ph.D. dissertation no. 15226.
You do not currently have access to this content.