The unsteady aero-dynamics of a single-stage high-pressure turbine blade operating at design corrected conditions has been the subject of a thorough study involving detailed measurements and computations. The experimental configuration consisted of a single-stage high-pressure turbine and the adjacent, downstream, low-pressure turbine nozzle row. All three blade-rows were instrumented at three spanwise locations with flush-mounted, high-frequency response pressure transducers. The rotor was also instrumented with the same transducers on the blade tip and platform and the stationary shroud was instrumented with pressure transducers at specific locations above the rotating blade. Predictions of the time-dependent flow field around the rotor were obtained using MSU-TURBO, a three-dimensional (3D), nonlinear, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. Using an isolated blade-row unsteady analysis method, the unsteady surface pressure for the high-pressure turbine rotor due to the upstream high-pressure turbine nozzle was calculated. The predicted unsteady pressure on the rotor surface was compared to the measurements at selected spanwise locations on the blade, in the recessed cavity, and on the shroud. The rig and computational models included a flat and recessed blade tip geometry and were used for the comparisons presented in the paper. Comparisons of the measured and predicted static pressure loading on the blade surface show excellent correlation from both a time-average and time-accurate standpoint. This paper concentrates on the tip and shroud comparisons between the experiments and the predictions and these results also show good correlation with the time-resolved data. These data comparisons provide confidence in the CFD modeling and its ability to capture unsteady flow physics on the blade surface, in the flat and recessed tip regions of the blade, and on the stationary shroud.

1.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 2001, “
Convective Heat-Transfer and Aerodynamics in Axial Flow Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0506.
2.
Venable
,
B. L.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
,
Busby
,
J. A.
,
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Dorney
,
D. J.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 1998, “
Influence of Vane–Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics—Part I: Time-Averaged Data and Analysis
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-481.
3.
Busby
,
J. A.
,
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Dorney
,
D. J.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Venable
,
B. L.
, and
Delaney
,
R. A.
, 1998, “
Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics Part II: Time Resolved Data and Analysis
,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-482.
4.
Barter
,
J. W.
,
Vitt
,
P. H.
, and
Chen
,
J. P.
, 2000, “
Interaction Effects in a Transonic Turbine Stage
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0376.
5.
Keilb
,
J. J.
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study of Blade Forced Response in a Full-Scale Rotating Turbine at Actual Engine Conditions
,” MS thesis, The Ohio State University, OSU GTL Doc. #1999̱8̱M6.
6.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 1989, “
Phase and Time-Resolved Measurements of Unsteady Heat-Transfer and Pressure in a Full-Stage Rotating Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-135.
7.
Metzger
,
D. E.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Hah
,
C.
, 1990, “
Turbine Tip and Shroud Heat-Transfer
,” ASME Paper No. 90-GT-333.
8.
Ameri
,
A. A.
, and
Steinthorsson
,
E.
, 1996, “
Analysis of Gas Turbine Tip and Shroud Heat-Transfer
,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-189.
9.
Ameri
,
A. A.
, and
Steinthorsson
,
E.
, 1995, “
Prediction of Unshrouded Rotor Blade Tip and Shroud Heat-Transfer
,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-142.
10.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Cinvinskas
,
K. C.
, and
Boyle
,
R. J.
, 1994, “
Time-Averaged Heat-Transfer and Pressure Measurements and Comparison with Prediction for a Two-Stage Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
116
, pp.
14
22
.
11.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Rae
,
W. J.
, and
Holt
,
J. L.
, 1984, “
Measurement and Analysis of Heat Flux Data in a Turbine Stage—Part II: Discussion of Results and Comparison with Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
106
, pp.
234
240
.
12.
Bunker
,
R. S.
,
Bailey
,
J. C.
, and
Ameri
,
A. A.
, 1999, “
Heat-Transfer and Flow on the First Stage Blade Tip of A Power Generation Gas Turbine: Part 2–Experimental Results
,” Paper No. NASA TM 1999-209152.
13.
Ameri
,
A. A.
, and
Bunker
,
R. S.
, 2000, “
Heat-Transfer and Flow on the First Stage Blade Tip of A Power Generation Gas Turbine: Part 2-Simulation Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
122
, pp.
272
277
.
14.
Green
,
B. R.
, 2004, “
Time-Averaged and Time-Accurate Aerodynamics for the Recessed Tip Cavity of a Rotating High-Pressure Turbine Blade and the Stationary Outer Shroud
,”
The Ohio State University
, Columbus, OH.
15.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Moller
,
J. C.
, and
Steel
,
R. C.
, 1989, “
Operating Point Verification for a Large Shock Tunnel Test Facility
,” Paper No. WRDC-TR-2027.
16.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, and
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, 1995, “
Phase-Resolved Surface Pressure and Heat-Transfer Measurements on the Blade of a Two-Stage Turbine
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
117
, pp.
653
658
.
17.
Dunn
,
M. G.
, 1986, “
Heat-Flux Measurements for the Rotor of a Full-Stage Turbine: Part 1–Time-Averaged Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
108
, pp.
90
97
.
18.
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Bennett
,
W. A.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
, and
Rao
,
K. V.
, 1992, “
Investigation of Unsteady Flow Through a Transonic Turbine Stage: Data/Prediction Comparison for Time-averaged and Phase-Resolved Pressure Data
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
114
, pp.
91
99
.
19.
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, 2003, “
An Experimental Investigation of Clocking Effects on Turbine Aerodynamics Using a Modern 3D One and one-half Stage High Pressure Turbine for Code Verification and Flow Model Development, Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering
,”
Ohio State University
, Columbus, OH, p.
345
.
20.
Whitfield
,
D. L.
,
Janus
,
J. M.
, and
Simpson
,
L. B.
, 1988, “
Implicit Finite Volume High Resolution Wave-Split Scheme for Solving the Unsteady Three-Dimensional Euler and Navier–Stokes Equations on Stationary or Dynamic Grids
,” Paper No. MSSU-EIRS-ASE-88-2.
21.
Roe
,
P. L.
, 1981, “
Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
43
, pp.
357
372
.
22.
Osher
,
S.
, and
Chakravarthy
,
S. R.
, 1984, “
Very High Order Accurate TVD Schemes
,” ICASE Report No. 84-44.
23.
Steger
,
J. L.
, and
Warming
,
R. F.
, 1981, “
Flux Vector Splitting of the Inviscid Gasdynamic Equations with Application to Finite-Difference Methods
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
40
, pp.
263
293
.
24.
Shih
,
T. H.
,
Liou
,
W. W.
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
, 1995, “
A New k-e Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
0045-7930,
24
, pp.
227
237
.
25.
Chen
,
J. P.
, and
Barter
,
J. W.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Time-Accurate Calculations for the Unsteady Interaction in a Turbomachinery Stage
,” AIAA Paper 98-3292.
26.
Chen
,
J. P.
,
Celestina
,
M. L.
, and
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
, 1994, “
A New Procedure for Simulating Unsteady Flows Through Turbomachinery Blade Passages
,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-151.
You do not currently have access to this content.