A unique comparative experimental and numerical investigation carried out on two test cases with shroud configurations, differing only in the labyrinth seal path, is presented in this paper. The blade geometry and tip clearance are identical in the two test cases. The geometries under investigation are representative of an axial turbine with a full and partial shroud, respectively. Global performance and flow field data were acquired and analyzed. Computational simulations were carried out to complement the investigation and to facilitate the analysis of the steady and unsteady flow measurements. A detailed comparison between the two test cases is presented in terms of flow field analysis and performance evaluation. The analysis focuses on the flow effects reflected on the overall performance in a multi-stage environment. Strong interaction between the cavity flow and the blade tip region of the rotor blades is observed up to the blade midspan. A marked effect of this interaction can be seen in the downstream second stator where different vortex structures are observed. Moreover, in the partial shroud test case, a strong tip leakage vortex is developed from the first rotor and transported through the downstream blade row. A measurable change in the second stage efficiency was observed between the two test cases. In low aspect ratio blades within a multi-stage environment, small changes in the cavity geometry can have a significant effect on the mainstream flow. The present analysis has shown that an integrated and matched blade-shroud aerodynamic design has to be adopted to reach optimal performances. The additional losses resulting from small variations of the sealing geometry could result in a gain of up to one point in the overall stage efficiency.

1.
Langston
,
L. S.
, 2001, “
Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review
,”
Heat Transfer in Gas Turbine Systems
, pp.
11
26
.
2.
Chaluvadi
,
V. S. P.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
Banieghbal
,
M. R.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Denton
,
J. D.
, 2001, “
Blade Row Interaction in a High Pressure Turbine
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
174
, pp.
892
901
.
3.
Wallis
,
A. M.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Demargne
,
A. A. J.
, 2001, “
The Control of Shroud Leakage Flows to Reduce Aerodynamic Losses in a Low Aspect Ratio, Shrouded Axial Flow Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
119
, pp.
1
8
.
4.
Peters
,
P.
,
Breisig
,
V.
,
Giboni
,
A.
,
Lerner
,
C.
, and
Pfost
,
H.
, 2000, “
The Influence of the Clearance of Shrouded Rotor Blades on the Development of the Flow Field and Losses in the Subsequent Stator
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-478.
5.
Anker
,
J. E.
, and
Mayer
,
J. F.
, 2002, “
Simulation of the Interaction of Labyrinth Seal Leakage Flow and Main Flow in an Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT-30348.
6.
Morphis
,
G.
, and
Bindon
,
J. P.
, 1995, “
The Flow in a Second Stage Nozzle of a Low Speed Axial Turbine and its Effect on Tip Clearance Loss Development
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
117
, pp.
571
577
.
7.
Hunter
,
S.
, and
Manwaring
,
S.
, 2000, “
Endwall Cavity Flow Effects on Gaspath Aerodynamics in an Axial Flow Turbine: Part I—Experimental and Numerical Investigation
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-651.
8.
Wellborn
,
S. R.
, 2001, “
Details of Axial-Compressor Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows
,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-495.
9.
Demarge
,
A. A. J.
, and
Longley
,
J. P.
, 2000, “
The Aerodynamic Interaction of Stator Shroud Leakage and Mainstream Flows in Compressors
,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-570.
10.
Schlienger
,
J.
, 2003, “
Evolution of Unsteady Secondary Flows in a Multistage Shrouded Axial Turbine
,” Ph.D. thesis No. 15230, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
11.
Treiber
,
M.
,
Kupferschmied
,
P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, 1998, “
Analysis of the Error Propagation Arising From the Measurements With a Miniature Pneumatic 5-Hole Probe
,”
XIVth Symposium on Measuring Techniques for Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines
.
12.
Kupferschmied
,
P.
,
Köppel
,
O.
,
Gizzi
,
W. P.
, and
Gyarmathy
,
G.
, “
Time Resolved Flow Measurements With Fast Aerodynamic Probes in Turbomachinery
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
0957-0233,
11
, pp.
1036
,
1054
.
13.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Pfau
,
A.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2003, “
Effect of Labyrinth Seal Variation on Multistage Axial Turbine Flow
.” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38270.
14.
Spalart
,
P.
, and
Allmaras
,
S.
, 1992, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,” Technical Report No. AIAA-92-0439,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
.
15.
Schlienger
,
J.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
R. S.
Abhari
, 2004, “
Vortex-Wake-Blade Interaction in a Shrouded Axial Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2004-53915.
16.
Gier
,
J.
,
Stubert
,
B.
,
Broulliet
,
B.
, and
De Vito
,
L.
, 2003, “
Interaction of Shrouded Leakage Flow and Main Flow in a Three-Stage LP Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. 2003-GT-38025.
17.
Denton
,
J. D.
, 1993, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
0889-504X,
115
, pp.
621
658
.
18.
Behr
,
T.
,
Porreca
,
L.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
, 2004, “
Multistage Aspects and Unsteady Effects of Stator and Rotor Clocking in an Axial Turbine With Low Aspect Ratio Blading
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53612.
19.
Pfau
,
A.
, 2004. “
Loss Mechanisms in Labyrinth Seals of Shrouded Axial Turbines
,” ETH Ph.D. dissertation No. 15226.
You do not currently have access to this content.