High performance compressor airfoils at a low Reynolds number condition at Re=1.3×105 have been developed using evolutionary algorithms in order to improve the performance of the outlet guide vane (OGV), used in a single low pressure turbine (LPT) of a small turbofan engine for business jet aircrafts. Two different numerical optimization methods, the evolution strategy (ES) and the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), were adopted for the design process to minimize the total pressure loss and the deviation angle at the design point at low Reynolds number condition. Especially, with respect to the MOGA, robustness against changes of the incidence angle is considered. The optimization process includes the representation of the blade geometry, the generation of a numerical grid and a blade-to-blade analysis using a quasi-three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver with a k-ω turbulence model including a newly implemented transition model to evaluate the performance. Overall aerodynamic performance and boundary layer properties for the two optimized blades are discussed numerically. The superior performance of the two optimized airfoils is demonstrated by a comparison with conventional controlled diffusion airfoils (CDA). The advantage in performance has been confirmed by detailed experimental investigations, which are presented in Part II of this paper.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
aerodynamics, genetic algorithms, laminar flow, boundary layers, Navier-Stokes equations
Topics:
Airfoils, Blades, Boundary layers, Design, Optimization, Reynolds number, Flow (Dynamics), Turbulence, Compressors
1.
Rhoden, H. G., 1952, “Effects of Reynolds Number on the Flow of Air through a Cascade of Compressor Blades,” ARC, R&M No. 2919.
2.
Roberts
,
W. B.
,
1975
, “
The Effect of Reynolds Number and Laminar Separation on Axial Cascade Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
97
, pp.
261
–
274
.
3.
Schreiber, H. A., Steinert, W., Sonoda, T., and Arima, T., 2003, “Advanced High Turning Compressor Airfoils for Low Reynolds Number Condition, Part II: Experimental and Numerical Analysis,” ASME J. Turbomach., to be published.
4.
Koeller
,
U.
,
Moenig
,
R.
,
Kuesters
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines, Part 1: Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, pp.
397
–
405
.
5.
Benini
,
E.
, and
Toffolo
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Development of High-Performance Airfoils for Axial Flow Compressor Using Evolutionary Computation
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
18
(
3
), pp.
544
–
554
.
6.
Drela, M., 1998, “MISES Implementation of Modified Abu-Ghannam/Shaw Transition Criterion (Second Revision),” M.I.T. Aero-Astro.
7.
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
Steinert
,
W.
, and
Kuesters
,
B.
,
2002
, “
Effect of Reynolds Number and Free-Stream Turbulence on Boundary Layer Transition in a Compressor Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
124
, pp.
1
–
9
.
8.
Chien
,
J. Y.
,
1982
, “
Predictions of Channel and Boundary Layers With a Low-Reynolds-Number Two Equation Model of Turbulence
,”
AIAA J.
,
20
, pp.
33
–
38
.
9.
Arima
,
T.
,
Sonoda
,
T.
,
Shirotori
,
M.
,
Tamura
,
A.
, and
Kikuchi
,
K.
,
1999
, “
A Numerical Investigation of Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor Flow Using a Low-Reynolds-Number k-ε Turbulence Model
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
44
–
58
.
10.
Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
11.
Fonseca, C. M., and Fleming, P. J., 1993, “Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion, and Generalization,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms.
12.
Hansen, N., and Ostermeier, A., 1996, “Complete Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies: The Covariance Matrix Adaptation,” in Proceedings 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 312–317.
13.
Olhofer, M., Arima, T., Sonoda, T., Fischer, M. and Sendhoff, B., 2001, “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Evolution Strategies,” Optimization in Industry, I. C. Parmee and P. Hajela, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 83–94.
14.
Piegl, L., and Tiller, W., 1997, The NURBS Book, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
15.
Yamaguchi, Y., and Arima, T., 2002, “Aerodynamic Optimization for the Compressor Stator Blade,” Optimization in Industry, I. C. Parmee and P. Hajela, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 163–172.
16.
Oyama, A., and Liou, M. S., 2002, “Multiobjective Optimization of a Multi-Stage Compressor Using Evolutionary Algorithm,” AIAA Paper 2002-3545.
17.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1988
, “
Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models
,”
AIAA J.
,
26
(
11
), pp.
1299
–
1310
.
18.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
,
1980
, “
Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
213
–
228
.
19.
Kuegeler, E., Weber, A., and Lisiewicz, S., 2001, “Combination of a Transition Model With a Two-Equation Turbulence Model and Comparison with Experimental Results,” The 4th European Turbomachinery Conference, ATI-CST-076/01.
20.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
–
531
.
21.
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1993
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines: A Discussion
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
207
–
217
.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.