This paper presents the detailed numerical analysis including parametric studies on the aerodynamic excitation mechanisms in a turbine stage due to the unsteady stator-rotor interaction. The work is part of the predesign study of a high-pressure subsonic turbine for a rocket engine turbopump. The pressure level in such turbines can be remarkably high (in this case 54 MPa inlet total pressure). Hence, large unsteady rotor blade loads can be expected, which impose difficult design requirements. The parameter studies are performed at midspan with the numerical flow solver UNSFLO, a 2-D/Q3-D unsteady hybrid Euler/Navier-Stokes solver. Comparisons to 2-D and steady 3-D results obtained with a fully viscous solver, VOLSOL, are made. The investigated design parameters are the axial gap (∼8–29 percent of rotor axial chord length) and the stator vane size and count (stator-rotor pitch ratio ∼1–2.75). For the nominal case the numerical solution is analyzed regarding the contributions of potential and vortical flow disturbances at the rotor inlet using rotor gust computations. It was found that gust calculations were not capable to capture the complexity of the detected excitation mechanisms, but the possibility to reduce excitations by enforcing cancellation of the vortical and potential effects has been elaborated. The potential excitation mechanism in the present turbine stage is found dominant compared to relatively small and local wake excitation effects. The parameter studies indicate design recommendations for the axial gap and the stator size regarding the unsteady rotor load.

1.
Holmes, D. G., Mitchel, B. E., and Lorence, C. B., 1997, “Three Dimensional Linearized Navier-Stokes Calculations for Flutter and Forced Response,” 8th Int. Symp. on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity in Turbomachines, Stockholm, Sweden.
2.
Silkowski, P. D., and Hall, K. C., 1997, “A Coupled Mode Analysis of Unsteady Multistage Flows in Turbomachinery,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-186.
3.
Giles, M., 1991, “UNSFLO: A Numerical Method For The Calculation Of Unsteady Flow In Turbomachinery,” GTL Report No. 205.
4.
Jung, A. R., Mayer, J. F., and Stetter, H., 1996, “Simulation of 3D-Unsteady Stator/Rotor Interaction in Turbomachinery Stages of Arbitrary Pitch Ratio,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-69.
5.
He, L., 1999, “Three-Dimensional Unsteady Navier-Stokes Analysis of Stator-Rotor Interaction in Axial-Flow Turbines,” Paper No. 557/049/99, 3rd European Conf. on Turbomachinery, London, UK.
6.
Manwaring
,
S. R.
, and
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
1993
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics and Gust Response in Compressors and Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
724
740
.
7.
Chung
,
M.-H.
, and
Wo
,
A. M.
,
1997
, “
Navier Stokes and Potential Calculations of Axial Spacing Effect on Vortical and Potential Disturbances and Gust Response in an Axial Compressor
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
472
481
, July.
8.
Lakshminarayana, B., Chernobrovkin, A., and Ristic, D., 2000, “Unsteady Viscous Flow Causing Rotor-Stator Interaction in Turbines, Part 1: Data, Code, Pressure,” J. Propul. Power, 16, No. 5.
9.
Chernobrovkin, A., and Lakshminarayana, B., 2000, “Unsteady Viscous Flow Causing Rotor-Stator Interaction in Turbines, Part 2: Simulation, Integrated Flowfield and Interpretation,” J. Propul. Power, 16, No. 5.
10.
Korakianitis
,
T.
,
1992
, “
On the Prediction of Unsteady Forces on gas Turbine Blades: Part 1—Description of the Approach
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
114
122
.
11.
Korakianitis
,
T.
,
1992
, “
On the Prediction of Unsteady Forces on gas Turbine Blades: Part 2—Analysis of the Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
123
131
.
12.
Busby
,
J. A.
,
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Dorney
,
D. J.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
,
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
Venable
,
B. L.
, and
Delaney
,
R. A.
,
1999
, “
Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics Part II: Time-Resolved Data and Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
673
682
.
13.
Venable
,
B. L.
,
Delaney
,
R. A.
,
Busby
,
J. A.
,
Davis
,
R. L.
,
Dorney
,
D. J.
,
Dunn
,
M. G.
,
Haldeman
,
C. W.
, and
Abhari
,
R. S.
,
1999
, “
Influence of Vane-Blade Spacing on Transonic Turbine Stage Aerodynamics Part I: Time-Averaged Data and Analysis
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
663
672
.
14.
Von Hoyningen-Huene, M., and Hermeler, J., 1999, “Time-Resolved Numerical Analysis of the 2-D Aerodynamics in the First Stage of an Industrial Gas Turbine for Different Vane-Blade Spacings,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-102.
15.
Jo¨cker, M., Freudenreich, K., and Fransson, T., 2000, “Parametric Studies of the Aerodynamic Excitation in High Pressure Turbines,” 9th Int. Symp. on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT) Lyon, France, September 4–7.
16.
Moss, R. W., Ainsworth, A. W., Sheldrake, C. D., and Miller, R., 1997, “The Unsteady Pressure Field Over a Turbine Blade Surface: Visualization and Interpretation of Experimental Data,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-474.
17.
Hilditch, M. A., Smith, G. C., and Singh, U. K., 1998, “Unsteady Flow in a Single Stage Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-531.
18.
Birch, T., 1987, “Navier-Stokes Predictions of Transition, Loss and Heat Transfer in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME Paper No. 87-GT-22.
19.
Eriksson, L.-E., 1990, “A Third Order accurate Upwind-Biased Finite Volume Scheme for Unsteady Compressible Flow,” VFA Report 9370-154, Volvo Aero Corporation, Trollha¨ttan, Sweden.
20.
Eriksson, L. E., 1995, “Development and Validation of Highly Modular Flow Solver Versions in G2DFLOW and G3DFLOW Series for Compressible Vis-cous Reacting Flow,” Technical Report 9970-1162 Volvo Aero Corporation, Sweden.
21.
Hodson, H. P., and Dawes, W. N., 1998, “On the Interpretation of Measured Profile Losses in Unsteady Wake-Turbine Blade Interaction Studies,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120, Apr..
22.
Goldstein
,
M. E.
,
1978
, “
Unsteady Vortical and Entropic Distortions of Potential Flows Round Arbitrary Obstacles
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
89
, Part 3, pp.
433
468
.
23.
Feiereisen, J. M., Montgomery, M. D., and Fleeter, S., 1993, “Unsteady Aerodynamic Forcing Functions—A Comparison Between Linear Theory and Experiment,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-141.
You do not currently have access to this content.