This paper is Part I of a study concerned with developing a formal framework for modeling air-cooled gas turbine cycles and deals with basic thermodynamic issues. Such cycles involve gas mixtures with varying composition which must be modeled realistically. A possible approach is to define just two components, air and gas, the latter being the products of stoichiometric combustion of the fuel with air. If these components can be represented as ideal gases, the entropy increase due to compositional mixing, although a true exergy loss, can be ignored for the purpose of performance prediction. This provides considerable simplification. Consideration of three idealized simple cycles shows that the introduction of cooling with an associated thermal mixing loss does not necessarily result in a loss of cycle efficiency. This is no longer true when real gas properties and turbomachinery losses are included. The analysis clarifies the role of the cooling losses and shows the importance of assessing performance in the context of the complete cycle. There is a strong case for representing the cooling losses in terms of irreversible entropy production as this provides a formalized framework, clarifies the modeling difficulties, and aids physical interpretation. Results are presented that show the effects on performance of varying cooling flowrates and cooling losses. A comparison between simple and reheat cycles highlights the ro^le of the thermal mixing loss. Detailed modeling of the heat transfer and cooling losses is discussed in Part II of this paper.

1.
Lakshminarayana, B., 1995, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer of Turbomachinery, Wiley, New York, Chap. 7.
2.
Day
,
C. R. B.
,
Oldfield
,
M. L. G.
, and
Lock
,
G. D.
,
1999
, “
The Influence of Film Cooling on the Efficiency of an Annular Nozzle Guide Vane Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
, pp.
145
151
.
3.
MacArthur, C. D., 1999, “Advanced Aero-Engine Turbine Technologies and Their Application to Industrial Gas Turbines,” Proc. 14th Int. Symp. on Air Breathing Engines, Florence, Paper No. 99-7151.
4.
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
Watson
,
D. T.
, and
Jones
,
T. V.
,
2001
, “
Limitations on Gas Turbine Performance Imposed by Large Turbine Cooling Flows
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
123
, pp.
487
494
.
5.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbo-Machines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
621
656
.
1.
El-Masri
,
M. A.
,
1985
–6, “
On Thermodynamics of Gas Turbine Cycles: Part I—Second Law Analysis of Combined Cycles,” Part II—A Model for Expansion in Cooled Turbines,” Part III—Thermodynamic Potential and Limitations of Cooled Reheat-Gas-Turbine Combined Cycles
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
880
889
;
2.
108, pp. 151–159;
3.
108, pp. 160–170.
1.
El-Masri
,
M. A.
,
1987
, “
Exergy Analysis of Combined Cycles: Part 1—Air-Cooled Brayton-Cycle Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
109
, pp.
228
236
.
2.
Chiesa, P., Consonni, S., Lozza, G., and Macchi, E., 1993, “Predicting the Ultimate Performance of Advanced Power Cycles Based on Very High Temperatures,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-223.
3.
Facchini
,
B.
,
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
2000
, “
Exergy Analysis of Combined Cycles Using Latest Generation Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
122
, pp.
233
238
.
4.
Kotas, T. J., 1985, The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis, Butterworths.
You do not currently have access to this content.