In Part I of this paper a family of numerically optimized subsonic compressor airfoils for heavy-duty gas turbines, covering a wide range of flow properties, is presented. The objective of the optimization was to create profiles with a wide low loss incidence range. Therefore, design point and off-design performance had to be considered in an objective function. The special flow conditions in large-scale gas turbines have been taken into account by performing the numerical optimization procedure at high Reynolds numbers and high turbulence levels. The objective of Part II is to examine some of the characteristics describing the new airfoils, as well as to prove the reliability of the design process and the flow solver applied. Therefore, some characteristic members of the new airfoil series have been extensively investigated in the cascade wind tunnel of DLR cologne. Experimental and numerical results show profile Mach number distributions, total pressure losses, flow turning, and static pressure rise for the entire incidence range. The design goal with low losses and especially a wide operating range could be confirmed, as well as a mild stall behavior. Boundary layer development, particularly near stall condition, is discussed using surface flow visualization and the results of boundary layer calculations. An additional experimental study, using liquid crystal coating, provides necessary information on suction surface boundary-layer transition at high Reynolds numbers. Finally, results of Navier–Stokes simulations are presented that enlighten the total pressure loss development and flow turning behavior, especially at high incidence in relation to the results of the design tool. [S0889-504X(00)02602-7]

1.
Ko¨ller
,
U.
,
Mo¨nig
,
R.
,
Ku¨sters
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines—Part I: Design and Optimization
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
, this issue, pp.
397
405
.
2.
Drela, M., and Youngren, H., 1991, “Viscous/Inviscid Method for Preliminary Design of Transonic Cascades,” AIAA Paper No. 91-2364.
3.
Youngren, H., 1991, “Analysis and Design of Transonic Cascades With Splitter Vanes,” GTL Report No. 203, Mar., Cambridge, MA.
4.
Drela, M., and Youngren, H. 1996, “A User’s Guide to MISES 2.4,” MIT Computational Aerospace Science Laboratory.
5.
Drela, M., 1995, “Implementation of Modified Abu-Ghannam Shaw Transition Criterion,” MISES User’s Guide, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
6.
Abu-Ghannam
,
B. J.
, and
Shaw
,
R.
,
1980
, “
Natural transition of boundary layers—The effects of turbulence, pressure gradient and flow history
,”
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
,
22
, No.
5
, pp.
213
228
.
7.
Schulenberg, Th., Zimmermann, H., 1995, “New Blade Design of Siemens Gas Turbines,” presented at POWER-GEN Europe, May 16–18, Amsterdam.
8.
Ko¨ller, U., 1999, “Entwicklung einer fortschrittlichen Profilsystematik fu¨r stationa¨re Gasturbinenverdichter,” Dissertation, Ruhr Universita¨t Bochum, Germany.
9.
Mayle
,
E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar–Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
537
.
10.
Schreiber, H. A., Starken, H., and Steinert, W., 1993, “Transonic and Supersonic Cascades,” AGARDOgraph “Advanced Methods for Cascade Testing,” Ch. Hirsch, ed., AGARD AG 328, pp. 35–59.
11.
Steinert
,
W.
,
Fuchs
,
R.
, and
Starken
,
H.
,
1992
, “
Inlet Flow Angle Determination of Transonic Compressor Cascades
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, No.
3
, pp.
487
493
.
12.
Eulitz, F., Engel, K., Pokorny, S., 1996, “Numerical Investigation of Inviscid and Viscous Interaction in a Transonic Compressor,” Loss Mechanisms and Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines, AGARD-CP-571, Paper No. 38.
13.
Eulitz, F., Engel, K., Gebing, H., 1996. “Application of a one-equation eddy-viscosity model to unsteady turbomachinery flow,” Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments 3, W. Rodi and G. Bergeles, eds., Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam, pp. 741–751.
14.
Spalart, P. R., and Allmaras, S. R., 1992, “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” Paper No. AIAA-92-0439.
15.
Giles M. B., 1990, “UNSFLO: A Numerical Method for the Calculation of the Unsteady Flow in Turbomachinery,” GTL Rept. 205, Gas Turbine Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
16.
Ku¨sters
,
B.
, and
Schreiber
,
H. A.
,
1998
, “
Compressor Cascade Flow With Strong Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction
,”
AIAA J.
,
36
, No.
11
, pp.
2072
2078
.
1.
Halstead
,
D. E.
,
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
Walker
,
G. J.
,
Hodson
,
H. P.
, and
Shin
,
H. W.
,
1997
, “
Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines, Part 1–4
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
114
127
;
2.
119
, pp.
426
444
;
3.
119
, pp.
225
237
;
4.
119
, pp.
128
139
.
1.
Steinert
,
W.
, and
Starken
,
H.
,
1996
, “
Off-Design Transition and Separation Behavior of a CDA Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
204
210
.
2.
Koch
,
C. C.
, and
Smith
,
L. H.
,
1976
, “
Loss Sources and Magnitudes in Axial-Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
98
, pp.
411
424
.
3.
Scha¨ffler
,
A.
,
1980
, “
Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Effects of Reynolds Number and Blade Surface Roughness on Multistage Axial Flow Compressors
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
102
, pp.
5
12
.
You do not currently have access to this content.