The paper presents the results of a detailed investigation of the flow field in a gas turbine linear cascade. A comparison between a contoured and a planar configuration of the same cascade has been performed, and differences in the three-dimensional flow field are here analyzed and discussed. The flow evolution downstream of the trailing edge was surveyed by means of probe traversing while a three-dimensional Navier–Stokes solver was employed to obtain information on flow structures inside the vaned passages. The experimental measurements and the numerical simulation of the three-dimensional flow field have been performed for two cascades; one with planar endwalls, and the other with one planar and one profiled endwall, so as to present a reduction of the nozzle height. The investigation was carried out at an isentropic downstream Mach number of 0.6. Airfoils of both cascades were scaled from the same high-pressure gas turbine inlet guide vane. Measurements of the three-dimensional flow field have been performed on five planes downstream of the cascades by means of a miniaturized five-hole pressure probe. The presence of endwall contouring strongly influences the secondary effects; the vortex generation and their development are inhibited by the stronger acceleration taking place throughout the cascade. The results show that the secondary effects on the contoured side of the passage are confined in the endwall region, while on the flat side the secondary vortices display characteristics similar to the ones occurring downstream of the planar cascade. The spanwise outlet angle distribution presents a linear variation for most of the nozzle height, with quite low values approaching the contoured endwall. The analysis of mass-averaged losses shows a significant performance improvement in the contoured cascade. This can be ascribed not only to lower secondary losses but also to a reduction of the profile losses.

1.
Bassi, F., and Savini, M., 1995, “Secondary Flows in a Turbine Cascade at Off-Design Conditions,” AGARD CP-517, Loss Mechanism and Unsteady Flows in Turbomachinery.
2.
Boletis
E.
,
1985
, “
Effects of Tip Endwall Contouring on the Three-Dimensional Flow Field in an Annular Turbine Nozzle Guide Vane: Part 1—Experimental Investigation
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
107
, pp.
983
990
.
3.
Dejc, E., et al., 1965, Atlas of Axial Turbine Blade Characteristic, Machinostroenie Publishing House, Moscow CEGB Inf. Services, C. E. Trans. 4563.
4.
Dossena, V., Osnaghi, C., Perdichizzi, A., and Savini, M., 1996, “On Testing the Aerodynamics of Film Cooled Blades,” Proc. XIII Symposium on Measuring Techniques on Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines, Zurich.
5.
Ewen, J. S., Huber, F. W., and Mitchell, J. P., 1973, “Investigation of the Aerodynamic Performance of a Small Axial Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 73-GT-3.
6.
Kopper
F. C.
,
Milano
R.
, and
Vanco
M.
,
1981
, “
Experimental Investigation of Endwall Profiling in a Turbine Blade Cascade
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
19
, No.
8
, pp.
1033
1040
.
7.
Morris, A. W., and Hoare, R. G., 1975, “Secondary Loss Measurements in a Cascade of Turbine Blades With Meridional Wall Profiling,” ASME Paper No. 75-WA/GT-13.
8.
Moustapha, S. H., and Williamson, R. G., 1986, “Effect of Two Endwall Contours on the Performance of an Annular Nozzle Cascade,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 84, No. 9.
9.
Osnaghi, C., and Perdichizzi, A., 1990, “Aerodynamic Measurements in Turbine Cascades at High Mach Number,” Proc. X Symposium on Measuring Techniques on Transonic and Supersonic Flows in Cascades and Turbomachines, Von Karman Institute, Bruxelles.
10.
Wilcox, D. C., 1988, “Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No. 11.
11.
Wilcox, D. C., 1994, “Simulation of Transition With a Two-Equation Turbulence Model,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.