This paper presents results of rig testing of a transonic, single-stage turbine at off-design conditions. Mapping of the 3.4 pressure ratio, 1.9 stage loading turbine ranged from 70 through 120 percent of design speed and 75 to 125 percent of design pressure ratio. Results show expansion efficiency dropping over 4 percent from 100 to 80 percent of design speed at design pressure ratio, while remaining within half a percent from 90 to 110 percent of design pressure ratio at design speed. Efficiency lapse rate from equivalent sea-level to cruise altitude Reynolds numbers at the design point was measured and found to be worth over 1.5 percent. Analyses of test results using a viscous three-dimensional solver showed very good agreement for the efficiency change with speed.

1.
Benner
M. W.
,
Sjolander
S. A.
, and
Moustapha
S. H.
,
1997
, “
Influence of Leading-Edge Geometry on Profile Losses in Turbines at Off-Design Incidence: Experimental Results and an Improved Correlation
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, pp.
193
200
.
2.
Bryce
J. D.
,
Litchfield
M. R.
, and
Leversuch
N. P.
,
1985
, “
The Design, Performance and Analysis of a High Work Capacity Transonic Turbine
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
107
, pp.
931
937
.
3.
Crow, D.E., Vanco, M.R., Welna, H., and Singer, I. D., 1980, “Results From Tests on a High Work Transonic Turbine for an Energy Efficient Engine,” ASME Paper No. 80-GT-146.
4.
Davis, R.L., Shang, T., Buteau, J., and Ni, R-H., 1996, “Prediction of 3D Unsteady Flow in Multi-stage Turbomachinery Using an Implicit Dual Time-Step Approach,” AIAA Paper No. 96-2565.
5.
Ewen, J.S., Huber, F.W., and Mitchell, J.P., 1973, “Investigation of the Aerodynamic Performance of Small Axial Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 73-GT-3.
6.
Kacker
S. C.
, and
Okapuu
U.
,
1982
, “
A Mean Line Prediction Method for Axial Flow Turbine Efficiency
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
104
, pp.
111
119
.
7.
Liu, H.C., Booth, T.C., and Tall, W.A., 1979, “An Application of 3D Viscous Flow Analysis to the Design of a Low Aspect Ratio Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 79-GT-146.
8.
Moustapha
S. H.
,
Okapuu
U.
, and
Williamson
R. G.
,
1987
, “
The Influence of Rotor Blade Aerodynamic Loading on the Performance of a Highly Loaded Turbine Stage
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
109
, pp.
155
162
.
9.
Moustapha
S. H.
,
Kacker
S. C.
, and
Tremblay
B.
,
1990
, “
An Improved Incidence Losses Prediction Method for Turbine Airfoils
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
112
, pp.
267
276
.
10.
Ni, R.H., and Bogoian, J., 1989, “Prediction of 3D Multi-stage Turbine Flow Field Using a Multiple-Grid Euler Solver,” AIAA Paper No. 89-0203.
11.
Okapuu, U., 1974, “Some Results From Tests on a High Work Axial Gas Generator Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 74-GT-81.
12.
Vlasic
E. P.
,
Girgis
S.
, and
Moustapha
S. H.
,
1996
, “
The Design and Performance of a High Work Research Turbine
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
118
, pp.
792
799
.
13.
Walraevens
R. E.
, and
Cumpsty
N. A.
,
1995
, “
Leading Edge Separation Bubbles on Turbomachine Blades
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
117
, pp.
115
125
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.