A model for predicting transition in flows with separation is presented in this study. The two-layer model of turbulence is employed, along with a suitably defined intermittency function, which takes appropriate values in the laminar-, transitional- and turbulent-flow regions. Correlations derived from measurements are used for this purpose. Two test cases were selected: the flow over a long horizontal body with semi-circular leading edge and the flow over the backward-facing step of small height (expansion ratio of 1:1.01). In the former, oncoming flows with a free-stream turbulence level encountered in practical applications was considered (0.2–5.6 percent) whereas in the latter the corresponding level was much lower. The Reynolds numbers, based on the diameter in the first case and on the step height in the second, lie in the range of 1600–6600, in which limited numerical investigations were previously available and where bubbles with laminar separation and turbulent reattachment are expected. The predictions were found to compare well with the corresponding measurements, both in terms of the lengths of the separation and the transition regions and of velocity and turbulence intensity profiles at various stream-wise locations. The results show that, for the transition criterion chosen, in all cases transition is completed downstream of the reattachment point and that the rate at which it is completed increases with the free-stream turbulence level.

1.
Abu-Ghannam
B. J.
, and
Shaw
R.
,
1980
, “
Natural transition of Boundary Layers—The effects of turbulence, pressure gradient, and flow history
,”
J. of Mech. Engg. Science
, Vol.
22
, No.
5
, pp.
213
228
.
2.
Arena
A. V.
, and
Mueller
T. J.
,
1980
, “
Laminar separation, transition and turbulent reattachment near the leading edge of airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
18
, No.
7
, pp.
747
753
.
3.
Bellows
W. J.
, and
Mayle
R. E.
,
1986
, “
Heat Transfer Downstream of a Leading Edge Separation Bubble
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
131
136
.
4.
Chen
K. K.
, and
Thyson
N. A.
,
1971
, “
Extension of Emmons’ spot theory to flows on blunt bodies
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
9
, No.
5
, pp.
821
825
.
5.
Cho
N.-H.
,
Liu
X.
,
Rodi
W.
, and
Scho¨nung
B.
,
1993
, “
Calculation of wake-induced unsteady flow in a turbine cascade
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
675
686
.
6.
Coupland, J., 1995, “Transition modelling for turbomachinery flows,” ER-COFTAC Bulletin, No. 24, pp. 5–8, 1995.
7.
Crimi
P.
, and
Reeves
B. L.
,
1976
, “
Analysis of leading-edge separation bubbles on airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
14
, No.
11
, pp.
1548
1555
.
8.
Emmons
H. W.
,
1951
, “
The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer—Part I
,”
J. of the Aeronautical Sciences
, Vol.
18
, pp.
490
498
.
9.
Gotthardt, H., 1983, “Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen an ebenen Turbinengittern mit Pfeilung und V-Stellung,” Dissertation, Universita¨t Braunschweig.
10.
Haas
W.
,
Rodi
W.
,
Scho¨nung
B.
, and
Swamy
N. V. C.
,
1987
, “
Experimentelle Untersuchung von lokalen Ablo¨seblasen an Gasturbinenschaufeln
,”
Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforschung
, Vol.
11
, pp.
261
270
.
11.
Hazarika, B. K., and Hirsch, C., 1996, “The effect of Reynolds number on the behaviour of a leading edge separation bubble,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-410.
12.
Karniadakis, G. E., Orszag, S. A., and Yakhot, V., 1990, “Large-eddy/RNG simulation of flow over a backward-facing step,” in: Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Experiments, W. Rodi and E. N. Ganic´, eds., pp. 269–278, Elsevier, New York.
13.
Kaiktsis
L.
,
Karniadakis
E. M.
, and
Orszag
S. A.
,
1991
, “
Onset of three-dimensionality, equilibria, and early transition in flow over a backward-facing step
,”
J. of Fluid Mech.
, Vol.
231
, pp.
501
528
.
14.
Kwon
O. K.
, and
Pletcher
R. H.
,
1979
, “
Prediction of incompressible separated boundary layers including viscous-inviscid interaction
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
101
, pp.
466
472
.
15.
Majumdar
S.
,
Rodi
W.
, and
Zhu
J.
,
1992
, “
Three-dimensional finite-volume methods for incompressible flows with complex boundaries
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
114
, pp.
496
503
.
16.
Malkiel
E.
, and
Mayle
R. E.
,
1996
, “
Transition in a Separation Bubble
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
118
, pp.
752
759
.
17.
Mayle
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
113
, pp.
509
537
.
18.
Papanicolaou, E., 1996, “Computation of Separated-Flow Transition Using a Two-Layer Model of Turbulence,” Rep. No. 733, Institute for Hydromechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
19.
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C.
20.
Rhie
C. M.
, and
Chow
W. L.
,
1983
, “
Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil trailing edge separation
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
21
, No.
11
, pp.
1525
1532
.
21.
Roberts
W. B.
,
1980
, “
Calculation of laminar separation bubbles and their effect on airfoil performance
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
18
, No.
1
, pp.
25
825
.
22.
Rodi
W.
, and
Scho¨nung
B.
,
1987
, “
Interaktives-Inverses Grenzschichtverfahren zur Berechnung von lokalen Ablo¨seblasen an Turbinenschaufeln
,”
Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforschung
, Vol.
11
, pp.
271
280
.
23.
Rodi, W., 1991, “Experience with two-layer models combining the k–ε model with a one-equation model near the wall,” AIAA Paper No. 91-0216, presented at the 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada.
24.
Rodi
W.
,
Mansour
N. N.
, and
Michelassi
V.
,
1993
, “
One-Equation Near-Wall Turbulence Modelling With the Aid of Direct Simulation Data
,”
ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering
, Vol.
115
, pp.
196
205
.
25.
Savill, A. M., 1992, “A T3 Test Case Project Report—Predicting Transition Induced by Free-Stream Turbulence,” presented at the IAHR/ERCOFTAC Turbulence Modelling SIG Seminar, Delft, The Netherlands.
26.
Savill, A. M., 1994, T3D Test Case Problem Specification (private communication).
27.
Savill, A. M., 1995, “A Summary report on the COST ERCOFTAC Transition SIG project evaluating turbulence models for predicting transition,” ERCOFTAC Bulletin, No. 24, pp. 57–61.
28.
Schlichting, H., 1979, Boundary Layer Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
29.
Van Doormal
J. P.
, and
Raithby
G. D.
,
1984
, “
Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows
,”
Num. Heat Transfer
, Vol.
7
, pp.
147
163
.
30.
Walker, G. J., Subroto, P. H., and Platzer, M. F., 1988, “Transition modeling effects on viscous/inviscid interaction of low Reynolds number airfoil flows involving laminar separation bubbles,” ASME Paper No. 88-GT-32.
31.
Walker
G. J.
,
1993
, “
The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines: a discussion
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
115
, pp.
207
217
.
32.
Zhu, J., 1991a, “FAST-2D: A computer program for numerical simulation of two-dimensional incompressible flows with complex boundaries,” Rep. No. 690, Institute for Hydromechanics, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
33.
Zhu
J.
,
1991
b, “
A low-diffusive and oscillation-free convection scheme
,”
Comm. in Applied Num. Methods
, Vol.
7
, pp.
225
232
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.