In this paper a systematic approach to the optimization of two-dimensional blade profiles is presented. A genetic optimizer has been developed that modifies the blade profile and calculates its profile loss. This process is automatic, producing profile designs significantly faster and with significantly lower loss than has previously been possible. The optimizer developed uses a genetic algorithm to optimize a two-dimensional profile, defined using 17 parameters, for minimum loss with a given flow condition. The optimizer works with a “population” of two-dimensional profiles with varied parameters. A CFD mesh is generated for each profile, and the result is analyzed using a two-dimensional blade-to-blade solver, written for steady viscous compressible flow, to determine profile loss. The loss is used as the measure of a profile’s “fitness” The optimizer uses this information to select the members of the next population, applying crossovers, mutations, and elitism in the process. Using this method, the optimizer tends toward the best values for the parameters defining the profile with minimum loss.

1.
Cravero, C., and Dawes, W. N., 1997, “Through Flow Design Using an Automatic Optimization Strategy,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-294.
2.
Cofer
J. I.
,
1996
, “
Advances in Steam Path Technology
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
118
, pp.
337
352
.
3.
Dawes, W. N., 1983, “Computation of viscous compressible flow in blade cascades using an implicit iterative replacement algorithm,” TPRD/M/1377/N83.
4.
Dawes, W. N., 1986, “Application of Full Navier–Stokes Solvers to Turbomachinery Flow Problems,” VKI Lecture Series 2: Numerical Techniques for Viscous Flow Calculations in Turbomachinery Blading, Jan. 20–24.
5.
Dawes
W. N.
,
1992
, “
Toward improved through flow capability: the use of three dimensional viscous flow solvers in a multistage environment
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
8
17
.
6.
Denton
J. D.
,
1978
, “
Throughflow calculations for transonic axial flow turbines
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
100
, No.
2
, pp.
212
218
.
7.
Faux, I. D., and Pratt, M. J., 1979, Computational Geometry for Design & Manufacture, Ellis Horwood Ltd.
8.
Goel, S., Cofer, J. I., and Singh, H., 1996, “Turbine Aerofoil Design Optimization,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-158.
9.
Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
10.
Pritchard, L. J., 1985, “An Eleven Parameter Axial Turbine Aerofoil Geometry Model,” ASME Paper No. 85-GT-219.
11.
Shelton, M. L., Gregory, B. A., Lamson, S. H., Moses, H. L., Doughty, R. L., and Kiss, T., 1993, “Optimization of a Transonic Turbine Airfoil Using Artificial Intelligence, CFD and Cascade Testing,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-161.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.