The influence of two stacking lines, namely sweep and dihedral, has been investigated in a linear compressor cascade. Both types of blade considered are symmetric about midspan and consist of a straight central section with either swept or dihedral sections toward the endwalls. Two types of experiment have been carried out. First, a parametric study was performed by changing both the magnitude and the extent of the sweep or dihedral. In the case of swept blades, those with forward sweep (SWF), for which the stacking line is swept in the upstream direction toward the endwall, were found to have better performance than backward-swept blades. Subsequently, four sets of SWFs were compared. In the case of dihedral blades, it is well known that the dihedral is advantageous when the angle between the suction surface and the endwall is obtuse, i.e., positive dihedral. Thus, four sets of positive dihedral blades (DHP) were compared. In both SWF and DHP blades, those configurations that have better efficiency than straight blades were determined. Second, detailed three-dimensional measurements inside the blade passage were performed in the cases that showed the best performance in the parametric study. Both SWF and DHP showed significant effects on the flowfield. In the SWF case, a vortex, which has the opposite sense to the passage vortex, was observed in the forward portion inside the blade passage. This vortex supplies high-energy fluid to the endwall region and reduces the corner stall. The secondary flow is greatly reduced. In the DHP, the blade loading was reduced at the endwall and increased at the midspan. Reduction of the corner stall and the secondary flow was also observed.

1.
Breugelmans
F. A. E.
,
Carels
Y.
, and
Demuth
M.
,
1984
, “
Influence of Dihedral on the Secondary Flow in a Two-Dimensional Compressor Cascade
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power
, Vol.
106
, pp.
578
584
.
2.
Weingold, H. D., Neubert, R. J., Behlke, R. F., and Potter, G. E., 1995, “Reduction of Compressor Stator Endwall Losses Through the Use of Bowed Stators,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-380.
3.
Harrison
S.
,
1992
, “
The Influence of Blade Lean on Turbine Losses
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
185
190
.
4.
Wang, Z., Han, W., and Xu, W., 1991, “The Effect of Blade Curving on Flow Characteristics in Rectangular Turbine Stator Cascades With Different Incidences,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-60.
5.
Robinson, C. J., Northall, J. D., and McFarlane, C. W. R., 1989, “Measurement and Calculation of the Three-Dimensional Flow in Axial Compressor Stators, With and Without Endbends,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-6.
6.
Wisler
D. C.
,
1985
, “
Loss Reduction in Axial-Flow Compressors Through Low-Speed Model Testing
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power
, Vol.
107
, pp.
354
363
.
7.
Tweedt
D. L.
,
Okiishi
T. H.
, and
Hathaway
M. D.
,
1986
, “
Stator End-wall Leading-Edge Sweep and Hub Shroud Influence on Compressor Performance
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
224
232
.
8.
Doerffer, P. P., and Amecke, J., 1994, “Secondary Flow Control and Streamwise Vortices Formation,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-376.
9.
Sanger
N. L.
,
1983
, “
The Use of Optimization Techniques to Design-Controlled Diffusion Compressor Blading
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering of Power
, Vol.
105
, pp.
256
263
.
10.
Sanger
N. L.
, and
Shreeve
R. P.
,
1986
, “
Comparison of the Calculated and Experimental Cascade Performance for Controlled-Diffusion Compressor Stator Blading
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
42
50
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.