This paper describes the results of a study to determine the performance improvements achievable by circumferentially indexing successive rows of turbine stator airfoils. An experimental/analytical investigation has been completed that indicates significant stage efficiency increases can be attained through application of this airfoil clocking concept. A series of tests was conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) to experimentally investigate stator wake clocking effects on the performance of the Space Shuttle Main Engine Alternate Fuel Turbopump Turbine Test Article. Extensive time-accurate Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations have been completed for the test configurations. The CFD results provide insight into the performance improvement mechanism. Part one of this paper describes details of the test facility, rig geometry, instrumentation, and aerodynamic operating parameters. Results of turbine testing at the aerodynamic design point are presented for six circumferential positions of the first stage stator, along with a description of the initial CFD analyses performed for the test article. It should be noted that first vane positions 1 and 6 produced identical first to second vane indexing. Results obtained from off-design testing of the “best” and “worst” stator clocking positions, and testing over a range of Reynolds numbers are also presented. Part two of this paper describes the numerical simulations performed in support of the experimental test program described in part one. Time-accurate Navier–Stokes flow analyses have been completed for the five different turbine stator positions tested. Details of the computational procedure and results are presented. Analysis results include predictions of instantaneous and time-average midspan airfoil and turbine performance, as well as gas conditions throughout the flow field. An initial understanding of the turbine performance improvement mechanism is described.

1.
Carter, J. A., 1991, “Blowdown Turbine Test Equipment Design Characteristics,” NASA memo ED35–45–91.
2.
Gaddis, S. W., Hudson, S. T., and Johnson, P. D., 1992, “Cold Flow Testing of the Space Shuttle Main Engine Alternate Turbopump Development High Pressure Fuel Turbine Model,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-280.
3.
Kauffman, W. J., Carter, J. A., Heaman, J. P., and Bordelon, W. J., 1992, “The Design and Performance of the Marshall Space Flight Center Turbine Test Equipment,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-380.
4.
Ni, R. H., 1981, “A Multiple-Grid Scheme for Solving the Euler Equations,” AIAA Paper No. 81-1025; AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 11.
5.
Ni, R. H., and Bogoian, J. C., 1989, “Prediction of 3D Multistage Turbine Flow Field Using a Multiple-Grid Euler Solver,” AIAA Paper No. 89-0203.
6.
Ni, R. H., Sharma, O. P., Takahashi, R., and Bogoian, J. C., 1989, “3D Unsteady Flow Simulation Through a Turbine Stage,” presented at the 1989 Australian Aeronautical Conference—Research and Technology—The Next Decade, Melbourne, Australia.
7.
Takahashi, R., and Ni, R. H., 1990, “Unsteady Euler Analysis of the Redistribution of an Inlet Temperature Distortion in a Turbine,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2262.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.