The flow field in a one-and-a-half-stage low-speed axial turbine with varying levels of rotor tip clearance was measured in order to compare the behavior of the second nozzle with the first and to identify the manner in which the second nozzle responds to the complex tip clearance dependent flow presented to it and completes the formation of tip clearance loss. The tangentially averaged flow relative to the rotor blade in the tip clearance region was found to differ radically from that found in cascade and is not underturned with a high axial velocity. There is evidence rather of overturning caused by secondary flow. The axial velocity follows an almost normal endwall boundary layer pattern with almost no leakage jet effect. The cascade tip clearance model is therefore not accurate. The reduction in second-stage nozzle loss was shown to occur near the hub and tip, which confirms that it is probably a reduction in secondary flow loss. The nozzle exit loss contours showed that leakage suppressed the formation of the classical secondary flow pattern and that a new tip clearance related loss phenomenon exists on the suction surface. The second-stage nozzle reduced the hub endwall boundary layer below that of both the first nozzle and that behind the rotor. It also rectified secondary and tip clearance flows to such a degree that a second-stage rotor would experience no greater flow distortion than the first-stage rotor. Radial flow angles behind the second-stage nozzle were much smaller than found in a previous study with low-aspect-ratio untwisted blades.

1.
Bindon, J. P., 1979, “The Effect of Hub Inlet Boundary Layer Skewing on the Endwall Shear Flow in an Annular Turbine Cascade,” ASME Paper No. 79-GT-13.
2.
Bindon, J. P., 1987, “The Measurement of Tip Clearance Flow Structure on the Endwall and Within the Clearance Gap of an Axial Turbine Cascade,” Proc. IMechE. Int. Conf.—Turbomachinery Efficiency Prediction and Improvement, Cambridge, Sept.
3.
Bindon
J. P.
,
1989
, “
The Measurement and Formation of Tip Clearance Loss
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
111
, pp.
257
263
.
4.
Bindon
J. P.
, and
Morphis
G.
,
1992
,, “
The Development of Axial Turbine Leakage Loss for Two Profiled Tip Geometries Using Linear Cascade Data
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
198
203
.
5.
Blair
M. F.
,
Dring
R. P.
, and
Joslyn
H. D.
,
1989
, “
The Effects of Turbulence and Stator/Rotor Interactions on Turbine Heat Transfer: Part 1—Design Operating Conditions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
111
, pp.
87
96
.
6.
Boletis, E., Sieverding, C. H., and Van Hove, W., 1983, “Effects of a Skewed Inlet Endwall Boundary Layer on the Three Dimensional Flow Field in an Annular Turbine Cascade,” AGARD CP 351, Paper No. 16.
7.
Boletis
E.
, and
Sieverding
C. H.
,
1991
, “
Experimental Study of the Three-Dimensional Flow Field in Turbine Stator Preceded by a Full Stage
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
113
, pp.
1
9
.
8.
Joslyn
H. D.
,
Dring
R. P.
, and
Sharma
O. P.
,
1983
, “
Unsteady Three-Dimensional Turbine Aerodynamics
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Power
, Vol.
105
, pp.
322
332
.
9.
Morphis, G., 1989, “The Measurement of Axial Turbine Tip Clearance Flow Phenomena in a Moving Wall Annular Cascade and in a Linear Cascade,” Master’s Thesis, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa, Oct.
10.
Morphis, G., and Bindon, J. P., 1994, “The Performance of a Low Speed Single Stage Axial Turbine With Varying Rotor Tip Clearance and Tip Gap Geometry,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-481.
11.
Walsh, J. A., and Gregory-Smith, D. G., 1987, “The Effect of Inlet Skew on the Secondary Flow and Losses in a Turbine Cascade,” Proc. IMechE. Int. Conf.—Turbomachinery Efficiency Prediction and Improvement, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Sept.
12.
Yaras, M., Sjolander, S. A., 1989, “Losses in the Tip-Leakage Flow of a Planar Cascade of Turbine Blades,” Paper #20, AGARD-CP-469, Secondary Flows in Turbomachines, Luxembourg, Sept.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.